God help me, but I was just thinking about our 2016 Presidential prospects

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

Are they really that desperate for something to do in their lives?  Or are they simply seeking the approval of the other DUmmies via their pretense.

EIther way, it is pitiful.

They need to know which new master to worship because they cannot bear the thought of being left to fend for themselves.

[98ZJUSMC]

I sometimes think the DUmmies pretend to sit around pondering presidential (and other political races) 24 hours a day.

Are they really that desperate for something to do in their lives?  Or are they simply seeking the approval of the other DUmmies via their pretense.

EIther way, it is pitiful.

I'm going with C).  B). is a given.

Probably the same reason I did, 0bama needed to go.

The only reason.

[Ptarmigan]

I got news for the DUmmies. There ain't gonna BE no O'Malley, or Schweizer, or Tester, or Warren(!), or anyone else for that matter, who is going to run against Hillary. Hillary is the ORDAINED nominee, and HAS been ordained since the reelection of Obama.

You see, Democrats have NOTHING they want to have displayed in ANY negative manner. The don't want to have an upstart run against Hillary and have to have her defend all sorts of crap, such as Benghazi (to which any GOP Sec. of State would be in JAIL, or any other easy pickin's from Hillary's illustriously notorious government service. In addition, they don't want to have to debate economics, foreign policy, environment controls, or virtually ANYTHING that can only give the potential GOP nominee a lot of ammo for the general election period.

This is why the memo has been put out, and all the Democratic Party press release organizations, aka the mainstream media, are reporting as if Hillary is the nominee. Once contenders start to stick their head out of the ground, Hillary, along with OFA's Whack-A-Mole operatives, will pound them back into their holes to prevent any primary debates from occurring.

EDIT: In reply to Reagan: Obviously, with an overwhelmingly Democratic congress, as well as over 34 states controlled top to bottom by Democrats, he had to be more political than he wanted to be. But other than the economy, keep in mind his number one goal: defending this country from the Soviet threat, which I contend was the most perilous during the perestroika era than the mid-60's to early 80's. It was imperative that the Soviet Union not just be checked, but defeated, and that he did. In retrospect, he should have played more hardball with illegal immigration "reform" as well as with other forms of increasing the government, but the context of the era puts Reagan firmly in the conservative camp.

If Reagan would have had a Tea Party-esque supermajority in the Senate, as well as a huge majority in the House at ANY two-year period of his presidency, I guarantee that this country would have been set on a course that would have rendered it very difficult for the socialists to prevail. For instance, we would have had a firm conservative majority on the Supreme Court for one, as well as permanent economic relief from taxes built into the framework. And this was also pre- Saul Alinsky realization by the populace that the democrats were at WAR with the GOP and not just political adversaries. Nowadays, there is no excuse.

That said, the GOP dropped the ball and capitulated once he left office.

Exactly. Ronald Reagan had to deal with a Democratic controlled Congress. On that topic, Jimmy Carter had multiple shutdown with a Democratic controlled Congress.

[Maxiest]

Watch what I tell you people...  Save this thread in your Bookmarks so you can go back to it.

It will be Michelle Obama 2016

Even though Hillary is in line to be heir to the throne the DNC knows she puts a bad taste in people's mouth.  Not to mention Benghazi and some other shit that could stick to her.

Michelle is a win win auto in Candidate.

Black and a Women???  The low info voter will trip over themselves to vote.  And we will be called misogynistic racist anytime we disagree with her.  The only thing better for them would be a Lesbian Blacktina.

[obumazombie]

^Interesting take. It's definitely probable. I also like the hint of conspiracy.

[jukin]

Watch what I tell you people...  Save this thread in your Bookmarks so you can go back to it.

It will be Michelle Obama 2016

Even though Hillary is in line to be heir to the throne the DNC knows she puts a bad taste in people's mouth.  Not to mention Benghazi and some other shit that could stick to her.

Michelle is a win win auto in Candidate.

Black and a Women???  The low info voter will trip over themselves to vote.  And we will be called misogynistic racist anytime we disagree with her.  The only thing better for them would be a Lesbian Blacktina.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! But you are right the Mooch is the perfect exterior candidate plus she can carry on all the great policies of her husband.

Look,there were things that President Reagan did (amnesty,some tax hikes) that many today would excoriate.

Amnesty and the tax increases would have been OK if the democrats had kept their word. Only fault is that Reagan was fooled twice and he worked with a hostile congress.

[Ptarmigan]

Watch what I tell you people...  Save this thread in your Bookmarks so you can go back to it.

It will be Michelle Obama 2016

Even though Hillary is in line to be heir to the throne the DNC knows she puts a bad taste in people's mouth.  Not to mention Benghazi and some other shit that could stick to her.

Michelle is a win win auto in Candidate.

Black and a Women???  The low info voter will trip over themselves to vote.  And we will be called misogynistic racist anytime we disagree with her.  The only thing better for them would be a Lesbian Blacktina.

That is what I am thinking too about Michelle Obama running. This is despite the fact they talk of Hillary Clinton running. She had the chance in 2008, but lost out to Barack Obama.

It would be interesting if that Lesbian Blacktina was a Conservative Republican.   

[BannedFromDU]

Watch what I tell you people...  Save this thread in your Bookmarks so you can go back to it.

It will be Michelle Obama 2016

Even though Hillary is in line to be heir to the throne the DNC knows she puts a bad taste in people's mouth.  Not to mention Benghazi and some other shit that could stick to her.

Michelle is a win win auto in Candidate.

Black and a Women???  The low info voter will trip over themselves to vote.  And we will be called misogynistic racist anytime we disagree with her.  The only thing better for them would be a Lesbian Blacktina.

      I think the flaw in this argument is that the grifting 0moron family will realize how much cash there is in the after than the during, especially with all the media groups and other moronic orgs that will pay Lord Zero any amount to come bloviate. Also, 0bamacare will by 2016 be such a flaming disaster that the First Wookie will be good and ready to vacate the White House for whatever palace they have waiting for them in Chicago/Hawaii.

      In fact I predict that by 2016, 0dumbass will be fairly UNpopular in the DUmp and they'll have moved on to someone comforting...like Howard Dean. Seriously - I'd be willing to wager that. One thing you have to give the Clintons is that they hedge their bets well, and Cankles is DEFINITELY watching this debacle from the sidelines, trying to decide if she wants her name associated with the fix that will need to be implemented.

[Ptarmigan]

      I think the flaw in this argument is that the grifting 0moron family will realize how much cash there is in the after than the during, especially with all the media groups and other moronic orgs that will pay Lord Zero any amount to come bloviate. Also, 0bamacare will by 2016 be such a flaming disaster that the First Wookie will be good and ready to vacate the White House for whatever palace they have waiting for them in Chicago/Hawaii.

      In fact I predict that by 2016, 0dumbass will be fairly UNpopular in the DUmp and they'll have moved on to someone comforting...like Howard Dean. Seriously - I'd be willing to wager that. One thing you have to give the Clintons is that they hedge their bets well, and Cankles is DEFINITELY watching this debacle from the sidelines, trying to decide if she wants her name associated with the fix that will need to be implemented.

You got a point too, but I think Michelle Obama could run in 2016.

[Maxiest]

      I think the flaw in this argument is that the grifting 0moron family will realize how much cash there is in the after than the during, especially with all the media groups and other moronic orgs that will pay Lord Zero any amount to come bloviate. Also, 0bamacare will by 2016 be such a flaming disaster that the First Wookie will be good and ready to vacate the White House for whatever palace they have waiting for them in Chicago/Hawaii.

      In fact I predict that by 2016, 0dumbass will be fairly UNpopular in the DUmp and they'll have moved on to someone comforting...like Howard Dean. Seriously - I'd be willing to wager that. One thing you have to give the Clintons is that they hedge their bets well, and Cankles is DEFINITELY watching this debacle from the sidelines, trying to decide if she wants her name associated with the fix that will need to be implemented.

I disagree with the first part of your assessment.  Do you realize how much money if they both are Ex-Presidents?  I still think this Obamacare thing with somehow blow over.  I know it seems impossible from what is going on, but the democrat voters have short short memories when it comes to their own party.  And they take their promises to heart.  A promise like "I know things aren't going as we expected but when you vote for Michelle we will get everything on track, besides it's the Republicans fault because......"

[Freeper]

I disagree with the first part of your assessment.  Do you realize how much money if they both are Ex-Presidents?  I still think this Obamacare thing with somehow blow over.  I know it seems impossible from what is going on, but the democrat voters have short short memories when it comes to their own party.  And they take their promises to heart.  A promise like "I know things aren't going as we expected but when you vote for Michelle we will get everything on track, besides it's the Republicans fault because......"

Of course it will blow over, Winston Smith has almost a full year to do his magic.

[GOBUCKS]

Thinking of that day in 2017 when the jug-eared muslim leaves.

It would be so cool if he pardoned Blagojevich.

[JohnnyReb]

Amnesty and the tax increases would have been OK if the democrats had kept their word. Only fault is that Reagan was fooled twice and he worked with a hostile congress.

DEMOCRATS LIED and they did the same to Bush I. They promised Bush I that if he would increase taxes that they would balance the budget....they didn't. You can't trust the bastards.

[Freeper]

DEMOCRATS LIED and they did the same to Bush I. They promised Bush I that if he would increase taxes that they would balance the budget....they didn't. You can't trust the bastards.

Democrats have to lie.

[Ralph Wiggum]

Democrats have to lie.

Example - they are lying about how great ObamaCare is rolling out.