The Conservative Cave
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Send Us Hatemail !
mailbag@conservativecave.com
Home
Help
Login
Register
The Conservative Cave
»
The Bar
»
The Lounge
(Moderators:
Freeper
,
debk
) »
Should 'of', could 'of', etc. rather than should 'have', could 'have'.
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Should 'of', could 'of', etc. rather than should 'have', could 'have'. (Read 1399 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
dane
Hero Member
Posts: 1516
Reputation: +117/-24
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash2/37017
Should 'of', could 'of', etc. rather than should 'have', could 'have'.
«
on:
October 14, 2013, 04:31:44 PM »
Pet peeve, but I do not lose (not 'loose') sleep over, because I don't let it affect (not 'effect') my life adversely.
Logged
This too shall pass.
Celtic Rose
All American Girl
Hero Member
Posts: 4157
Reputation: +311/-32
Re: Should 'of', could 'of', etc. rather than should 'have', could 'have'.
«
Reply #1 on:
October 14, 2013, 04:39:12 PM »
I blame it on a lack of reading. Should've sounds like Should of, so if people don't see it written out, they don't realize that it is a contraction of should have.
Logged
zeitgeist
Hero Member
Posts: 6232
Reputation: +423/-44
Re: Should 'of', could 'of', etc. rather than should 'have', could 'have'.
«
Reply #2 on:
October 14, 2013, 04:49:47 PM »
Logged
< watch this space for coming distractions >
Undies
Hero Member
Posts: 2515
Reputation: +309/-54
Re: Should 'of', could 'of', etc. rather than should 'have', could 'have'.
«
Reply #3 on:
October 14, 2013, 05:01:28 PM »
Noone round hear makes those mistakes.
Logged
Happy Fun Ball
Hero Member
Posts: 2937
Reputation: +1031/-11
Re: Should 'of', could 'of', etc. rather than should 'have', could 'have'.
«
Reply #4 on:
October 14, 2013, 05:09:01 PM »
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
The Conservative Cave
»
The Bar
»
The Lounge
(Moderators:
Freeper
,
debk
) »
Should 'of', could 'of', etc. rather than should 'have', could 'have'.