« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2013, 12:22:03 PM »
There's more to this (probably) than Politico is willing to report...
<snip>
...The comments were made at a closed-door meeting about a Republican proposal to exempt lawmakers and their staffers from a new law that would require them to take part in health care exchanges, reports the Washington Post. The National Review — one of the only outlets to fully report the story’s many details — has more about the context of the discussion:
At issue is a requirement in the law that congressional staffers purchase their health insurance in the exchange markets. The Office of Personnel Management recently ruled that the federal government can continue providing a subsidy to use in the exchange markets, which critics such as Senator David Vitter have railed against as a special exemption from the law for Congress.
But at a closed-door conference meeting this morning in the Capitol basement as they discussed a proposal to reverse the ruling, some lawmakers were more concerned about their own well-being.
As these leaders debated how the proposal to reverse the ruling would impact their personal finances, some congressmen expressed their concern. But when it came to Gingrey, who has sought an end to the subsidy and introduced a “No Special Treatment for Congress Act,†he wasn’t willing to simply endorse special treatment for anyone serving in Congress.
And that’s when he apparently made the contentious comment about salaries.
<snip>

Logged
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker
"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus