There's no mention of abortion in the whole passage. This was a test to see if the woman had cheated, the only way of knowing (since no one caught them in the act) would be to drink the water and it either became bitter or it didn't. Now, how did the water know to be bitter or not? Obviously God, being all knowing and all-seeing, would know if she had been unfaithful and would make it where the water would produce the correct results.
The only way they could have possibly gotten "abortion" out of this would be v.22 where it says if she is guilty her belly would swell and she would miscarry. Thing is if you read other versions of that same passage, it says her belly would swell and she could no longer have children. That's why it's important to read several versions, because sometimes one version isn't always clear. The primitive got this from the NIV version which I personally view as a poor translation, this being one of many examples why. My own study has concluded that the KJV, NKJV, ASV, and NASV are the most accurate translations.
But see, liberals (and especially liberals with an agenda) aren't interested in accuracy. Just like the whole DU site, they only want info that backs up what they want to believe anyway.
vlyons
10. many Christians seem not to know the bits about feed the poor, heal the sick, practice peace, and love thy neighbor. Just saying ...
Sure we do, and we practice that as individuals. Now, how about you show me the bits where feeding the poor, healing the sick, practicing peace, and loving your neighbor is the responsibility of the gov't. Just saying...
.