« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Not A Religious Topic (Controversial Though)  (Read 1341 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mrclose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2256
  • Reputation: +164/-39
Not A Religious Topic (Controversial Though)
« on: July 21, 2013, 03:21:09 AM »
I saw a ridiculous debate last night on a Woman's Right to choose.

WAIT!

Don't run away just yet!

I sat and pondered over some interesting questions that I have about the subject and thought that some of you could shed some light on the following?

Ready?

In the twisted and sick minds of those who practice birth control by murdering their defenseless unborn children .. Only they have the Right to murder the child!?

For instance .. During the robbery of a woman with child (I like saying that .. With Child :-)) well anyways .. This woman loses the baby during the robbery .. it's some kind of murder charge, Right?

It is Only murder when someone else gets to do it first?

If the woman accidentally gets pregnant .. through no fault of her own, she should have a Right to throw the child out like a used condom but If someone else accidentally murders the accidental child before She gets to murder the child .. It's murder!?

(Don't Go Away ..There's More)

You knew that though .. didn't you?


=====================

Now let's take this to the next level!

Let's say that during the above robbery .. The woman who has the accidental pregnancy .. through no fault of her own .. goes into early labor because of her fear of being robbed by an , (If he had a look-a-like, Obama son).

And what if the Obama look-a-like Son .. accidentally stepped on the head of the partially born accidental baby and killed it?
That would also be some kind of murder charge?

Now what if that woman who was pregnant .. through no failt of her own went to an understanding and caring doctor who knew that the child was accidentally conceived through no fault of the woman's.

 And what if the woman said she didn't want the accidental child and the understanding and caring doctor .. to help the innocent woman stepped on the accidental baby's head and killed it?

Would that be some kind of murder charge because the woman with the accidental child .. through no fault of her own .. didn't get to murder the child first?

Or is it okay because she said that the caring and understanding doctor could murder the child first?


==========================


Okay .. How's this?

During the robbery by the If He Had A Son Obama Look-A-Like, the woman goes into early labor with the no fault of her own .. accidental child and the child falls on it's head and kills itself ... is it still some kind of murder charge?


See .. No Religious discussion needed here! :cheersmate:
Logged
"When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead.
It is difficult only for the others.

It is the same when you are stupid."
~ Anonymous

Offline seahorse513

  • I don't take shit from anyone!!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5260
  • Reputation: +492/-247
  • British by birth, American thru naturalization
Re: Not A Religious Topic (Controversial Though)
« Reply #1 on: July 21, 2013, 05:37:08 AM »
When you say, no fault of her own....do you mean rape or incest??
Logged
The sea is treacherous, but an even hand on the keel brings it safely to port.

Nothing is sexier than a man and his gun!!!

A man should prefer his own company to that of others, because no matter where he goes,he'll find himself there..

"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money".  Lady Maggie Thatcher

Offline Freeper

  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: Not A Religious Topic (Controversial Though)
« Reply #2 on: July 21, 2013, 06:30:25 AM »
Quote from: seahorse513 on July 21, 2013, 05:37:08 AM
When you say, no fault of her own....do you mean rape or incest??

I read it as sarcasm. Sounded like he was mocking the pro choice movement and how they duck all responsibility.
Logged
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline mrclose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2256
  • Reputation: +164/-39
Re: Not A Religious Topic (Controversial Though)
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2013, 12:08:11 AM »
Quote from: Freeper on July 21, 2013, 06:30:25 AM
I read it as sarcasm. Sounded like he was mocking the pro choice movement and how they duck all responsibility.
We Have A Winner!!

I'll be sure to post the /sarc tags next time!
Logged
"When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead.
It is difficult only for the others.

It is the same when you are stupid."
~ Anonymous

Offline mrclose

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2256
  • Reputation: +164/-39
Re: Not A Religious Topic (Controversial Though)
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2013, 12:10:36 AM »
I would have thought that the "Obama son look-a-like" or even the last scenario would have given it away :hammer:
Logged
"When you are dead, you don't know that you are dead.
It is difficult only for the others.

It is the same when you are stupid."
~ Anonymous

Offline Freeper

  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: Not A Religious Topic (Controversial Though)
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2013, 06:39:59 AM »
Quote from: mrclose on July 22, 2013, 12:08:11 AM
We Have A Winner!!

I'll be sure to post the /sarc tags next time!

I'm fluent in sarcasm.  :-)
Logged
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »