They are so enamored with abortion that they see even efforts to regulate it like other medical care as efforts to suppress it.
I personally believe that abortion is murder unless the life of the mother is in danger, but as a person involved in medicine, none of these laws appear to be above and beyond what would be required of any other medical procedure. I've never heard of any doctor prescribing a potentially dangerous medication without an in person exam. Hemorrhage is a real risk with RU-486 pill, and administering it without a medical facility within an easy distance is foolish and dangerous.
Surgical abortion is absolutely surgery, why shouldn't it be performed in an ambulatory surgery facility? Also, this particular law appears to be related to fire codes. Are they really upset over having to prove that they have sufficient fire sprinklers in place in case of a fire?
Ultrasounds, x-rays, MRI's, or CT scans are standard before many surgeries. Visualization of what will be operated on is generally considered standard practice.
DUmmies, if abortion is just like any other medical procedure, then it deserves to be regulated like all other medical procedures, which does involve a lot of onerous rules and procedures.