Author Topic: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough  (Read 2467 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired


Both Senate and House versions of the farm bill that Congress is looking to pass, preferably in short order and definitely before the current bill expires this September, are little better than deliberately gigantic messes full of an impressively convoluted combination of food stamps, corporate pork, tricky amendments, and completely unnecessary federal special treatment that agribusiness lobby claims agriculture for some reason deserves above all other economic sectors. The Hill has a useful rundown of some of the major battles that still need to be fought within Congress before they can agree upon a final bill, but one of the biggest is going to be over the majority of the spending in the bills that goes to food stamp programs. The Senate-passed version of the farm bill cut the food-stamp program by merely $400 million per year, with the support of the Obama administration, but the House is looking to go a little deeper (hi, trillion dollar yearly deficits, anyone?!) — and the Obama administration doesn’t like that at all.

Quote
The White House is threatening to veto the House version of a massive, five-year farm bill, saying food stamp cuts included in the legislation could leave some Americans hungry.

The House is preparing to consider the bill this week. The legislation would cut $2 billion annually, or around 3 percent, from food stamps and make it harder for some people to qualify for the program. Food stamps, now called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, cost almost $80 billion last year, twice the amount it cost five years ago. …

The White House said in its statement Monday that food stamps are “a cornerstone of our nation’s food assistance safety net.” The administration argued that the House should make deeper cuts to farm subsidies like crop insurance instead.

Yes, it’s very easy to talk about the people who will be helped by continued growth in the food stamp program, except that the Obama administration has completely obliterated the normal standards and has grown the program by a whopping 70 percent since 2008 alone — even as the White House continues to insist that employment is improving everyday and our economy is continuing to recover. If that were really the case, why the expanded need for food stamps? You can’t have it both ways, you know.

Oh, and by the way — where is a lot of that corporate and special-interest pork in the farms bills coming from, you might very well wonder?

Quote
House members have filed more than 200 amendments to the bill, which is expected to come to the floor later this week.

Link #1

Link #2

*Sigh.* Our Congresscritters still can't get it right. And they wonder why whale shit on the bottom of the ocean ranks higher than most of these twits.

And Barry. Shit, I'm having a good day. Don't get me started about Barry.  :whatever:
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1659/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2013, 11:53:13 AM »
The idea of making cuts in the budget to eliminate the deficit and reduce the debt didn't occur to the committees that put together this farm bill it seems.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2013, 12:28:04 PM »
Quote
The White House is threatening to veto the House version of a massive, five-year farm bill, saying food stamp cuts included in the legislation could leave some Americans hungry.

Good.  Maybe they will decide to do something about their situation instead of looking for a handout.

Offline FiddlingAnt

  • Just Off Probation
  • *
  • Posts: 115
  • Reputation: +17/-143
  • The Fiddling Ant
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2013, 02:58:42 PM »
There are fewer areas of the budget that have more pork that the Farm bill.  The majority of the senators and representatives bring home the bacon with big time Federal dollars for local spending. This is vote buying at its most basic and it includes both Democrats and Republicans. Send the bill to our grandkids again, they get to pay for foolish overspending of the politicians we send to Washington.

Offline Mr Mannn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14885
  • Reputation: +2646/-276
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2013, 08:11:52 PM »
With Republicans like this...who needs Democrats?

Offline I_B_Perky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7530
  • Reputation: +718/-329
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2013, 08:12:35 PM »
Good.  Maybe they will decide to do something about their situation instead of looking for a handout.

I agree. Let it expire and let the pavement apes and their worthless baby mamas starve. I bet it if there was no welfare you would see single motherhood percentages drop into single digits.
Living in the Dummies minds rent free since 2009!

Montani Semper Liberi

Offline CG6468

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11493
  • Reputation: +540/-210
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2013, 07:13:01 AM »
I agree. Let it expire and let the pavement apes and their worthless baby mamas starve. I bet it if there was no welfare you would see single motherhood percentages drop into single digits.

That's true. Now they get paid for each kid they pop out.
Illinois, south of the gun controllers in Chi town

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline CG6468

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11493
  • Reputation: +540/-210
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2013, 01:58:21 PM »
House defeats farm bill amid bipartisan opposition

Buh bye.

With any luck, buh-bey to John Boehner too.

103 amendments. What a bunch of shit.
Illinois, south of the gun controllers in Chi town

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1659/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2013, 02:04:44 PM »
With any luck, buh-bey to John Boehner too.

103 amendments. What a bunch of shit.

In comparison to whom he replaced...

edit grammar
« Last Edit: June 20, 2013, 04:11:31 PM by obumazombie »
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2013, 04:10:14 PM »
I sent this to my Congresscritter, Vickie Hartzler-R, Missouri 4th district, who voted for this pile of shit:

Quote
Dear Rep. Hartzler -

I'm disappointed in your "aye" vote for the Farm Bill -- that stupendously expensive pile of pork that featured 103 amendments.

When the cost of this pile of pork is $930 billion; when food stamps comprise 80% of that total ($744 billion), what did you expect? Maybe there are some sane people in Congress after all.

Why does the so-called House "leadership" refer to this as a "farm bill?" when there's so little "farm" about this legislation to begin with?

I will admit that a great many of your constituents are farmers. I am not. But it's pure socialism when the federal government steps in and attempts to restructure a free market economy to prop up certain aspects of agriculture (in this case, dairy and, oh yes -- ethanol. And many other agricultural products.

Get government out of farming and food stamps and let a free market economy structure things. Meddling is meddling, especially when the feds get mixed up into things.

It's a good thing this bill was defeated. But I'm somewhat certain something almost as egregious is going to take its place -- like the Senate version, for example, which is even worse than yours.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline Dori

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7964
  • Reputation: +406/-39
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2013, 07:10:06 PM »
Quote
...conservative Republicans, who wanted more cuts, and liberal Democrats, who wanted fewer, voted against the measure. The farm bill was defeated by a vote of 295 to 324.

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2013/0620/House-defeats-farm-bill-because-of-food-stamp-cuts
“How fortunate for governments that the people     they administer don't think”  Adolph Hitler

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2828/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2013, 08:37:25 AM »
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2013/0620/House-defeats-farm-bill-because-of-food-stamp-cuts

I'm not sure what your point is, but I will say that when the so-called "farm bill" cloaks and hides flat-out entitlement programs like food stamps, the politicians are deliberately being disingenuous.

Put that kind of crap in a separate bill and call it what it is - food stamps.

And then let's see how much cutting can be done.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline cmypay

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 481
  • Reputation: +24/-3
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2013, 12:35:41 PM »
I think I would have a lot less problem with food stamps being in the farm bill if the food stamp program actually supported the small family farmer (as originally intended). Maybe if people on food stamps could only buy actual, honest-to-God produce we could support local farmers AND solve the obesity problem.

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1659/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2013, 12:38:43 PM »
I think I would have a lot less problem with food stamps being in the farm bill if the food stamp program actually supported the small family farmer (as originally intended). Maybe if people on food stamps could only buy actual, honest-to-God produce we could support local farmers AND solve the obesity problem.
A good idea in the short run. But in the long run, the government using tax dollars to control people's habits will lead to nothing good.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline DefiantSix

  • Captain, IKV Defiant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17562
  • Reputation: +1752/-189
  • "Set Condition One throughout the ship."
Re: WH Threatens to Veto Farm Bill Because it isn't Expensive Enough
« Reply #15 on: June 23, 2013, 01:04:14 AM »
A good idea in the short run. But in the long run, the government using tax dollars to control people's habits will lead to nothing good.

:werd:
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker

"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers

"In this present crisis, government in not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus