As we all knew would happen, some of the DUmpmonkiez are flinging poo at the very possibility that the two bombers are guilty. Yes, I know that it would seen evidence is pretty well overwhelming, but that doesn't stop Ocpagu:
ocpagu (1,006 posts)
5. I really hope the authorities have more than a picture of two brothers in the street...
... as evidence to "justify" the treatment given to these suspects.
Now, to be fair, the other primates try to explain that fleeing from police in a stolen car while shooting and throwing bombs makes it hard to think they may be innocent, but Ocpagu... well, look:
ocpagu (1,006 posts)
14. We need to be sure we know who are the intelectual authors of the crime...
... and if they are also the executors.
Killing the suspects is not the best way of solving the issue.
Well, yes, that is true. BUT, I am fairly sure Barry really doesn't want the whole truth out in this case. (*cough* muslim extremist jihadi attack *cough*)
ocpagu (1,006 posts)
18. I think the habit of having a established modus operandi...
... in which suspects end up being killed before a conclusion by official investigation and a trial is dangerous.
I agree. I wonder why the one brother ran over his brother, killing him, and then tried to kill himself in the boat? Maybe to keep other people safe (*cough* other jihadi muslim fanatics *cough*)
ocpagu (1,006 posts)
50. Oh, sorry.
I had know idea you knew me (the "it") so well. Where did we meet again? When did we have any conversation about any subject before today?
...
...
Never?
Who the hell you think you are to make such a pathetic judgement on a person you don't even know?
When called out on it's CT bullshit. It gets angry and throws poo.
ocpagu (1,006 posts)
46. Well...
Why did they do that? Did they act alone? Were they the intellectual authors? Were they acting for domestic reasons? Are international organizations involved? Are domestic extremist organizations involved? Why targgeting civilians? Which group they intended to terrorize?
If you know all the answers already, please share.
If you think the suspects have nothing to add, "case closed, let's move on", I don't have a problem either. I just don't agree with this take and don't bother about people who like to force their opinions on others and can't accept constructive criticism.
You'd think the governemnt would love to ask these very questions... Say the FBI for example. Too bad they have been told to leave islam/muslim/jihad/ out of all their training manuals...
ocpagu (1,006 posts)
23. All the information is very recent.
There wasn't enough time to establish a deep investigation. And I'm not saying they are innocent - I'm saying we don't know enough. We know practically zero about their motivation. One of them is now dead, the other in a serious condition.
muslim/islam/jihad
ocpagu (1,006 posts)
44. You make a lot of assumptions.
I use quotation marks in "justify" because before a final investigation I can't assume lethal force being used against a suspect is just. It may have been necessary, I don't know. I'd rather them having a plan b to get the suspects alive.
There's nothing we know so far about their motivations and if they planned this or were just executing it.
ISLAM/MUSLIM/JIHAD!!!
ocpagu (1,006 posts)
60. Which evidence?
I see opinions. It looks like you and others expected me to have a undeclared agenda for my remarks first hand. At least that's what I understand from you when you say that "I'm up to something here" and the other poster saying I'm " describing a false flag event" (???!!!!) - without, of course, any evidence to even imply such a thing. If you are departing from this pre-conceived point and you don't even accept the possibility that I'm bringing - that my point here is precisely the only point I've talked about - and try to make me fit in a preconceived niche... I don't see any point in keeping oing, indeed.
So, good night.
poo flinging at it's finest.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014461393Ocpagu is my mole and I approve this message.
