House Majority in 2014!

[Freeper]

MineralMan (52,283 posts)

House Majority in 2014!


 
It's time to get started, folks. This is the goal we must reach in the 2014 election. Right now, nothing else matters. Wherever you are in the United States, it's time to contact your district's Democratic organization and ask how you can help in your district.

If anyone thinks this is not the most crucial issue for the next year, they're wrong. It is the ONLY issue.

Choose the best possible Democrat who has a chance to win in your primaries and GOTV!

Start now, please.

http://election.democraticunderground.com/10022626142

These idiots have no idea just how bad things will get if Pelosi gets the gavel again.

In a way I almost believe that if the dims get all 3 chambers that maybe that will finally be enough to get through to the low information voters that these people are dangerous. However we went through 4 years of 0bamanomics and people still lined up to vote for the jug eared one. Even as the economy is crumbling to the ground they don't hold 0bama responsible at all. they blame the repukes, ATMs, the groundhog not getting it right this year, and anything but 0bama. So I highly suspect that if the dims get the house back and do further damage that people will be just as stupid in 2016.

[JohnnyReb]

Where is Art Linkletter and "People are Stupid"?

[GOBUCKS]

It wiil be difficult for the 0bamaites to win back the Congress.

District boundaries in most states have been drawn by Republican legislatures.

The democrats are doing us a great service by making gun control the face of their party.

But as long as there's a Tea Party, they have a fighting chance.

[DumbAss Tanker]

But as long as there's a Tea Party, they have a fighting chance.

...And a Beltway-centric, Ivy-league-oldboy-run GOP.

[BlueStateSaint]

...And a Beltway-centric, Ivy-league-oldboy-run GOP.

Exactly.  When Democrats run against Lite Democrats (RINOs such as the above-mentioned), the Democrats always win.  The "good ol' boys" are trying to turn the Republican Party away from conservativism and more towards a "moderate" (Democrat-lite) brand.

[GOBUCKS]

Exactly.  When Democrats run against Lite Democrats (RINOs such as the above-mentioned), the Democrats always win.  The "good ol' boys" are trying to turn the Republican Party away from conservativism and more towards a "moderate" (Democrat-lite) brand.

We'd be close to controlling the Senate today if it weren't for nutball Tea Party candidates like the witchy woman in Delaware and the abortion boys in Missouri and Indiana.

Those three candidacies gave away Senate seats that should have been in the bag.

Some House of Representatives districts are very conservative, but far right Senate candidates just can't win outside the South.

It'll be a moot point soon if the muslim can sign up millions of illegal mexicans.

That would put socialist democrats in the driver's seat everywhere.

[BlueStateSaint]

We'd be close to controlling the Senate today if it weren't for nutball Tea Party candidates like the witchy woman in Delaware and the abortion boys in Missouri and Indiana.

"Close" only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, and some nuclear weapons.

We still wouldn't be in control.

[Tucker]

Rockhead is in for a big disappointment. Thanks to the conservative sweep of 2010, the democrat party will be crying in their beer until 2020, at least. The census dictates representatives per state and the party in control decides boundaries.

[J P Sousa]

We'd be close to controlling the Senate today if it weren't for nutball Tea Party candidates like the witchy woman in Delaware and the abortion boys in Missouri and Indiana.

Those three candidacies gave away Senate seats that should have been in the bag.

Some House of Representatives districts are very conservative, but far right Senate candidates just can't win outside the South.

It'll be a moot point soon if the muslim can sign up millions of illegal mexicans.

That would put socialist democrats in the driver's seat everywhere.

If you do a little research you will find died in the wool GOP'ers were in bed with the dems to defeat Tea Party candidates. It seems the establishment GOP would rather have dems in office rather than Tea Party types.

People like McLame and Grahmnesty "like" to work across the aisle with dems rather than real conservatives.
.

[GOBUCKS]

If you do a little research you will find died in the wool GOP'ers were in bed with the dems to defeat Tea Party candidates. It seems the establishment GOP would rather have dems in office rather than Tea Party types.

People like McLame and Grahmnesty "like" to work across the aisle with dems rather than real conservatives.

I'd rather win with someone I agree with 90% of the time, than lose with someone I agree with 100% of the time.

In statewide and national elections, that's usually the choice you make.

The alternative is a democrat, with whom I agree on absolutely nothing.

[DumbAss Tanker]

We'd be close to controlling the Senate today if it weren't for nutball Tea Party candidates like the witchy woman in Delaware and the abortion boys in Missouri and Indiana.

Indiana I don't know about so much, the MO candidate was an egotistical asshat that didn't understand why his Democrat opponent dumped a huge amount of money into his primary campaign, and since he was running against two good candidates, the additional money from her and division between two good GOP opponents on the non-idiot side of the ticket handed him the win; unfortunate, but the egotism wasn't his alone, either Brunner or Steelman could have thrown in for the other and McCaskill's investment would have been wasted.  The establishment candidate in DE, as I recall, was widely believed to have cut a deal to change parties if elected and seated, and IIRC nothing about his record exactly rendered that a patently-ridiculous idea.

[jctejas]

why not vote for the establishment types like Christ sp?   who is now a demon cat.

jctejas

[sybilll]

I'd rather win with someone I agree with 90% of the time, than lose with someone I agree with 100% of the time.

In statewide and national elections, that's usually the choice you make.

The alternative is a democrat, with whom I agree on absolutely nothing.

Not a single thing has changed since 2010 when we swept the House and took control of 700 state legislature positions. Add to that ObamaCare implementation rolls out in 2014, and I think the Tea Party will prevail again in 2014.   

[BlueStateSaint]

Not a single thing has changed since 2010 when we swept the House and took control of 700 state legislature positions. Add to that ObamaCare implementation rolls out in 2014, and I think the Tea Party will prevail again in 2014.   

Pretty much.

ObamaCare takes friendly fire
By Sam Baker    - 04/06/13 12:17 PM ET
   
Delays in implementing popular pieces of ObamaCare are hurting it with Democrats.

Ahead of an election year in which Republicans promise to make healthcare an issue again, Democrats are criticizing the White House for delaying policies that could help build support for the unpopular law.

Democrats complained this week about a one-year delay in a key program designed to help small businesses — a central selling point for the healthcare law that now won’t be in place when voters head to the polls next year.

“Senate Republicans will have the opportunity to campaign against Obamacare's rising health care costs, burdensome paperwork and broken promises and could use it to motivate voters against Democrat candidates, especially vulnerable ones in red states,” Republican strategist Ron Bonjean said.

HHS has delayed by one year a provision that would have allowed small businesses in most states to choose from multiple policies for their workers. Although a handful of states will see increased competition next year, most will have just one plan to choose from until 2015.

It'll be a bloodbath of Dems in 2014, as more and more of this monstrosity is known.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/292157-obamacares-new-enemy-friendly-fire#ixzz2PrVB0985
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

[Airwolf]

2014. if only we could get it back. I was hoping it would turn the last time but as we all know it didn't happen. If the way things have been run by 0 were not enough to get Mclame elected then why bother thinking 2014 will be different. If the conservatives on the right do get elected then we might see some change but we will need more of it in 2016