DUmmies looking for info on NAMBLA

[Billiam Pitts]

Friggin heathens.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022615155

jmowreader (23,659 posts)

View profile
Does NAMBLA actually exist?
The Republicans love to inject the North American Man-Boy Love Association into every discussion of Non Family Values Approved Activity...whether the discussion is about gay marriage, abortion, or whatever, a Republican is sure to mention NAMBLA.

Now think about what NAMBLA claims to be: specifically, a club dedicated to giving adult men the right to have sex with underage boys. Their motto is "sex before eight or else it's too late."

Now for the reality here: Sex with underage boys is not only illegal, and there's no way it will ever be legalized, but the thought of it disgusts people. Men have sex with underage boys but those men wouldn't join a boy banging club because if its headquarters ever got raided, which you know it would be, every name on the rolls would be sent to law enforcement. You know the act of belonging to a boy banging club would be sufficient to convict on pedophilia charges..."if you aren't having sex with minors, Mr. Smith, why are you a NAMBLA member?"

So I have a deep suspicion this NAMBLA is a figment of the GOP's imagination, useful for shutting down debate. If someone says they approve of gay marriage or something, accusing them of also supporting NAMBLA is enough to end the conversation immediately..."because you support gay marriage (read that with an "eeuw, disgusting" tone to your thoughts) you must also support sex with boys" and of course the conversation ends immediately because denying you support pederasty only means you really support it.(Yes, wingers are that stupid.

[USA4ME]

As liberals have become more bold on the topic of homosexual marraige, they have also started to slowly introduce the idea of doing away with Age of Consent laws.  Should homosexual marriage ever be obtained in this country (which unfortunately it will be as we slide into the abyss), it'll just be a matter of time until Age of Consent will be the next goal.  And the primitives will be right on board with the idea pressing to change the law in the same manner they are with homosexual marriage.

.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

ZombieHorde (23,303 posts)

9. Yes. Allen Ginsberg was proabably their most famous member. nt

orly?

In "Howl" and in his other poetry, Ginsberg drew inspiration from the epic, free verse style of the 19th-century American poet Walt Whitman.[7] Both wrote passionately about the promise (and betrayal) of American democracy, the central importance of erotic experience, and the spiritual quest for the truth of everyday existence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Ginsberg

orly?

Whitman's sexuality is generally assumed to be homosexual or bisexual based on his poetry, though that has been at times disputed. His poetry depicts love and sexuality in a more earthy, individualistic way common in American culture before the medicalization of sexuality in the late 19th century.[120] Though Leaves of Grass was often labeled pornographic or obscene, only one critic remarked on its author's presumed sexual activity: in a November 1855 review, Rufus Wilmot Griswold suggested Whitman was guilty of "that horrible sin not to be mentioned among Christians".[121] Whitman had intense friendships with many men and boys throughout his life.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Whitman

[GOBUCKS]

The reason democrats have the NAMBLA club is to facilitate the exchange of homosexual child pornography.

[DumbAss Tanker]

I'm sure there are plenty of members on DU.  If jmowreader just asked more nicely, no doubt one of them would be glad to send a PM.

[miskie]

Yeah, NAMBLA exists primitive - here is an article from your beloved WaPo reporting that your beloved ACLU defended them in court back in 2000


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000831/aponline171914_000.htm

-It t'aint PSYOPS. NABLA is real - and you DUmmies need to 

[Freeper]

They have already started saying that one is born a pedophile, so the natural progression will be for them to become the next protected class. Hell there was even a thread here about some ding bat congresswoman who was saying that pedophilia is just another sexual orientation.

[Freeper]

Yeah, NAMBLA exists primitive - here is an article from your beloved WaPo reporting that your beloved ACLU defended them in court back in 2000


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000831/aponline171914_000.htm

-It t'aint PSYOPS. NABLA is real - and you DUmmies need to 

The ****ing ACLU defends these criminals, and just the other day forced a school to pull down a picture of Jesus that had been in that school for 40 years.
The ACLU is evil scum.

 

[Dori]

Didn't Soros' Open Society org. support NAMBLA?  Also, Obama's safe schools czar Jennings have something to do with NAMBLA?.

[Ballygrl]

NAMBLA marches openly under a banner in the San Francisco gay pride parade, the same parade where Democrats like Nancy Pelosi march, if the left was really against NAMBLA they wouldn't allow this.

[Duke Nukum]

At least one DUmmie hero I can think of was a proud member and that was Alan Ginsberg.

[Conservative Libertarian]

At least one DUmmie hero I can think of was a proud member and that was Alan Ginsberg.

A freaky liberal beatnick...no surpise.

[Vagabond]

Hell, at one point the Gay movement and NAMBLA were tied at the hip.  At some point the Homosexual lobby realized that they would never achieve anything while directly associated with NAMBLA and mad a facade of distancing themselves.  It isn't the truth though. 

Homosexuals realize that only a vanishingly small percentage of the population are "born" gay, and that they must engage in an intensive "recruiting" campaign to expand their numbers.  Homosexuals worship youth.  Look around and you won't see a rich successful homosexual with another old homosexual, they want youth and if they can't have it they want to be with it.  There are a percentage of them that will attack children because of this, but the more dangerous ones are the ones that get themsleves in positions of trust to be alone with the children, and then ply them with treats and threats, because once you're "theirs" you can never be allowed to go back to your normal life.  They hound anyone who tells the truth about them.

A lot of lesbians work the same way, they're just even more evil about it.

[Freeper]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association

The Wiki link for that disgusting organization.

[movie buff]

Yeah, NAMBLA exists primitive - here is an article from your beloved WaPo reporting that your beloved ACLU defended them in court back in 2000


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000831/aponline171914_000.htm

-It t'aint PSYOPS. NABLA is real - and you DUmmies need to  

Not only did the ACLU defend NAMBLA, they did it pro bono.

"Men have sex with underage boys but those men wouldn't join a boy banging club because if its headquarters ever got raided, which you know it would be, every name on the rolls would be sent to law enforcement. You know the act of belonging to a boy banging club would be sufficient to convict on pedophilia charges..."if you aren't having sex with minors, Mr. Smith, why are you a NAMBLA member?""
1. Some of them might not have ever actually had sex with a minor (Likely out of fear of being arrested), but wish to be able to do so.
2. I may be mistaken on this, but I think that in order for a person to be charged with child molestation (Or any sexual assault, for that matter), there would need to be an actual victim of sexual assault that the defendant could be linked to. Simply being a part of a club isn't enough to prove that an adult has had sex with a minor. The most that might do towards a conviction is maybe act as further corroborating evidence if there was already something of a case against him. In fact, if the prosecutors used simply his membership in a cub as proof that he did it with no other evidence, it might even enable NAMBLA to file some sort of slander/ defamation of character lawsuit. Let's put it another way: Suppose that a person who was a member of NORML (The lobbying organization that pushes to fully legalize marijuana) was arrested on charges of drug use or possibly even dealing. Suppose that a search of the person's house didn't yield a single bit of evidence. Do you think a case in court could be made against him by simply saying, "If you aren't using drugs, Mr. Smith, why are you a member of NORML?"?

[Karin]

Well, the DUmmies who respond did shoot down the OP's theory.  It's a strange OP, isn't it?  It's almost like he's opening the door just a crack for some purpose. 

[Billiam Pitts]

Well, the DUmmies who respond did shoot down the OP's theory.  It's a strange OP, isn't it?  It's almost like he's opening the door just a crack for some purpose. 

Yes it's how pedophiles like jmowreader operate, that thread is to show other DUmmie pederasts that he is interested in the organization. I'm sure his PM inbox was flooded with mail telling him just how he can join.

[Rebel]

Octafish (32,979 posts)
5. Seems like a lot of GOP big wigs belong to it.

Remember Mark Foley, Republican-FL, who was in charge of protecting 'Missing and Exploited Children'?

Excuse me? Name'em, DUmbass.

Meanwhile...

Harry Hay was a fierce advocate of man/boy love. While The Chronicle simply ignored Harry’s views, the North American Man/Boy Love Association was only too delighted to put up a collection of Harry’s views on the need for young boys to have older men as sexual partners. Here’s just a sample taken from a talk at a New York University forum sponsored by a campus gay group in 1983.

Said Harry: “Because if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.”

In short, San Francisco’s beloved Harry Hay was a vigorous and well-known advocate of older men having sex with young boys. He was a fearless and quite famous advocate for Congressman Mark Foley’s behavior.

Which makes one curious about the presence of marcher number 34 in the 2001 Pride Parade. Marching a mere three spots away from the famous Harry Hay, no doubt waving and smiling to the crowd, was, as the Chronicle logged her in the Official Guide and Program Parade Lineup: “U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi.”

That would be now Democratic leader of the U.S. Congress and the candidate of the Democratic Party to be the next Speaker of the House of Representatives, the official third in line to be President of the United States.

Surely this is a different Rep. Nancy Pelosi from the one who currently has on her website as Minority Leader the following statement:

“Republican leaders admitted to knowing about Mr. Foley’s abhorrent behavior for six months to a year and failed to protect the children in their trust. Republican Leaders must be investigated by the Ethics Committee and immediately questioned under oath.”

Abhorrent behavior? If men having sex with children is “abhorrent behavior” then it seems it would be quite logical for a United States Congresswoman to stand up and protest the presence of one of its leading advocates having a place of honor in a civic parade — a parade in which she herself would be marching mere steps behind him.

http://spectator.org/archives/2006/10/05/when-nancy-met-harry