Why DUmbasses like drone strikes

[GOBUCKS]

And collateral damage is a bitch. Barack Hussein Obama has killed more innocent children than Adam Lanza.
I know how I'll feel about my child or grandchild having coffee at a Starbucks, when Preezy O'Choom decides to smoke some "potential terrorist" at the next table with a missile.

There are no innocents in Afghanistan and Pakistan and the other muzzie hellholes.

"Collateral damage" just kills untargeted muzzies who are or will become enemies, regardless of who is President at the time.

The idea of using a Hellfire on an American Starbucks full of civilians is a silly red herring, but muzzies will certainly blow the place up if U.S. policy is timid enough to give them the chance.

[Gina]

Wow.  So they would like American citizens that they do not agree with to just be killed.  And they say we are the hateful/killing people?

[Airwolf]

But we do send shooters after bad guys. Ask bin Laden.

A UAV does the same job without putting an America boy in the line of fire.

Lethal force is lethal force.

What i meant was that they ,Meaning the left in the form of Sen. Frank Church and others during the 1907's went on their own Jihad over how the CIA went after the bad guys and the ways they used to do it but now some of those same Anti American assholes are ok with using a machine to do the same work that a team of guys could do. Yeah the UAV doesn't put lives on the line but the fact they doen't see anything wrong with why its done is the problem as log as its their enemies and not those of America.

[Big Dog]

There are no innocents in Afghanistan and Pakistan and the other muzzie hellholes.

"Collateral damage" just kills untargeted muzzies who are or will become enemies, regardless of who is President at the time.

The idea of using a Hellfire on an American Starbucks full of civilians is a silly red herring, but muzzies will certainly blow the place up if U.S. policy is timid enough to give them the chance.

Right now, somewhere in Iran, someone is saying:

There are no innocents in The United States.

"Collateral damage" just kills untargeted Americans who are or will become enemies, regardless of who is Imam at the time.

The idea of using a vest bomb on a Tehran coffeehouse full of civilians is a silly red herring, but Americans will certainly blow the place up if our policy is timid enough to give them the chance.

Sounds like the two of you are using the same script.