Author Topic: primitives on welfare  (Read 4005 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
primitives on welfare
« on: June 06, 2008, 03:37:29 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3397402

Oh my.

Quote
LucyParsons  Donating Member  (834 posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:36 PM
Original message

Poll question: Have you ever been on welfare?
   
I am not talking about Social Security, disability, or Medicaid.

Poll result (84 votes)

I am currently on welfare.   (2 votes, 2%)
I have been on welfare after entering the worforce (as an adult).   (15 votes, 18%)   
No, but I am using food stamps.   (5 votes, 6%)   
No, but I have used food stamps in the past.   (14 votes, 17%)   
My family was on welfare when I was a child.   (10 votes, 12%)   
I will have to use welfare or food stamps soon because of the bad economy.   (3 votes, 4%)
I have never been on welfare or food stamps, and do not forsee having to apply in the future.   (27 votes, 32%)   
Other   (8 votes, 10%)

One wonders what "welfare" is to the primitives.

We're treated with a nice warm little bouncy at the starting-gate:

Quote
Captain Angry  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message

1. If I hadn't saved so much while I was working...
   
I would be in trouble during my unemployment.

I have a discussion every so often with my dad's ultra-right wing friend. He thinks any form of this stuff is to promote laziness.

My response is that welfare and similar projects are supposed to be a safety net and not a hammock. They can be structured to help everybody while having systems to protect against misuse.

Quote
zonmoy  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message

2. depends on if SSI and social security disability count.

Quote
xxqqqzme  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2

11. SSI & SS disabilty are not welfare.
   
I get SS disability but that money is what I put into the system. I'm collecting.

Quote
Robbien  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message

3. Those Xmas food baskets handed out during holidays were life savers for my family growing up.

It is probably one of the major reasons I volunteer and support food banks today.

Quote
Hell Hath No Fury  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message

4. Not welfare per se....
   
but I did receive free San Francisco provided medical/mentl health benefits for four+ years. I was working but without health insurance and had several medical crises -- thankfully I lived in a city that has excellent health care at no/low cost for low income people.

The care I received was the best and it literally saved my life.

Damn that socialized medicine!

Quote
greenbriar  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message

5. I used food stamps and medical card when we were in college
   
we were living on my husband's SSDI (he is legally blind) during college

we had a young baby and needed to eat and she needed health care

Quote
Oceansaway  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message

6. while on strike in '86 i got food baskets and handouts....if that counts

Quote
tazkcmo  (117 posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message

7. Free School Lunches
   
ALL my life and my children received them as well during my 5 years in the Army. Oh, and WIC.

Quote
QuestionAll  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message

8. i'm permanently disabled, but i don't get welfare...
   
i get ssdi benefits that are based on my earned wages- except that my benefits are 125 or more less than they should be, because a past employer that accounted for that percentage of my lifetime wages never paid into the system the fica money that had been deducted from my checks.

Hmmm.  One suspects a stretchy there.

Quote
Cleita  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message

9. I have received unemployment once and presently get social security,
   
both government programs that help people out with income, but I never have used other kinds of assistance like food stamps.

Quote
slackmaster  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #9

15. Those are both benefits that you pre-paid for, and not everyone gets

Quote
Cleita  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #15

17. I understand the difference however, if we didn't have these government run programs I would be up the creek. They have actually prevented me from having to collect welfare at certain times of my life when working a job wasn't possible like now.

Quote
slackmaster  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #17

21. Devil's Advocate for a small moment
   
If we didn't have UI and SS programs, your take-home pay would have been higher throughout your working career. Theoretically you could have saved the extra, and be living off of that.

Quote
atreides1  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message

10. Other
   
As a child my family was on welfare and then while I was in the Army my family qualified for foodstamps while living in government quarters.

Quote
Wanet  (111 posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message

12. Intresting poll
   
I work in social services, and it is more appropriate to call it "cash aid" or "public assistance" -- that distinguishes it from Food Stamps and medical assistance. It looks like most of us have "been there" -- I wonder if people would answer honestly about this on Free Republic?

I dunno.

franksolich, who has been around a while, twice collected unemployment checks, once for three weeks, and another time for one week; but this all was a long time ago.

Quote
fight4my3sons  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message

13. My family is recieving food stamps and back-up medicaid benefits as well as WIC. You didn't have a category for that so I just checked the first one. My husband works full time plus overtime. He starts a new job on Monday and I'm not sure if we will still qualify for our benefits. It looks like we will. We were hoping that we would not. One more year and I will be back at work (the twins will start Kindergarten).

Quote
slackmaster  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message

14. Got food stamps one time only, right after I got out of college and was dead broke
   
It wasn't worth the hassle.

Quote
alfredo  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message

16. I had a temporary paralysis and I was put on welfare. Nearly starved.

Quote
appleannie1  Donating Member  (501 posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message

18. When pregnant with my second child and having a difficult pregnancy my X joined the military claiming he had no dependents. I was on Mother's Assistance until after the birth of my second child and I could go back to work. It took over a year of badgering the military but I finally got not only monthly money for my children but the X was demoted and the money that should have come to me during that year of no allotment was taken out his and sent to me.

Had it not been for welfare, my oldest son would have starved and my second son would not have gotten the care he needed to survive after being born premature and with birth defects. But just because I was thankful for it does not mean I enjoyed it, or would want to live on it even one minute longer than necessary.

Quote
kineneb  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message

19. get food stamps (EBT) and medical care
   
There is no assistance available for younger widows who were full-time caregivers. If I were over 65, I would get Social Security. So I am eking my way with help from family and friends, until I am able to earn a little myself.

Quote
Juche  (818 posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message

20. Define welfare
   
I got Pell Grants in college as well as other forms of state & federal aid. Everyone who goes to college in state gets about 5-6k a year in state subsidies.

Quote
Iris  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #20

26. Good point and one I think should be made more often, esp. in healthcare debates.
   
Assuming many doctors go to public colleges, that means our tax $$$ subsidize part of that education which therefore means we should get some benefit from subsidizing medical education even if we don't have insurance.

Quote
stillcool47  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message

22. I was raised on Social Security...
   
death benefits and VA benefits. I was raised by another family, never had any kind of insurance, and lived with mega-shame for a good deal of my life. I applied for medicaid when I was eighteen and had to get a tooth pulled. I will never forget it. This country sucks at taking care of those who need. The government stingily hands out band-aids, and then rips them off before the wound heals, and pours salt in in the wound, just so you never forget.

Quote
cynatnite  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message

23. Six months after my husband's injury we used it...
   
Savings was wiped out and workman's comp cut him off.

Quote
spenbax  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message

24.  I haven't been so far, but if Republicans had their way, I would be.

Quote
bertha katzenengel  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message

25. On welfare/FS growing up, and needed FS as a young adult.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16209
  • Reputation: +2100/-170
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2008, 03:42:27 PM »
Quote
I am currently on welfare.   (2 votes, 2%)

98% of Dummies lie, they lie all the time. :-)
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
  • Reputation: +2542/-49
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2008, 03:46:14 PM »
Quote
spenbax  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message

24.  I haven't been so far, but if Republicans had their way, I would be.

 :whatever: :whatever:  :bs: :mental: :mental:
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2008, 03:53:03 PM »
Sorry, but I have never gotten any kind of gummint freebie.....I'm a white male and to DUmmies, that disqualifies me.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2008, 04:36:07 PM »
So the greedy thorn primitive lives up to her name?

And one of them is on welfare now but has money for internet?
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2008, 09:32:26 PM »
Quote
xxqqqzme  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2

11. SSI & SS disabilty are not welfare.
   
I get SS disability but that money is what I put into the system. I'm collecting.

Now THERE'S someone who has absolutely no understanding of math or the Social Security system.

 :thatsright:
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19835
  • Reputation: +1616/-100
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2008, 09:39:24 PM »
Quote
greenbriar  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message

5. I used food stamps and medical card when we were in college
   
we were living on my husband's SSDI (he is legally blind) during college

we had a young baby and needed to eat and she needed health care

Yet he is now a hopeless drunk who somehow can lavish her with expensive rings and cruises while providing a lifestyle she simply can`t economically escape from.

She is beginning to sound like a female TIT..making up anything to fit the storyline of a given thread.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2008, 09:43:26 PM »
Yet he is now a hopeless drunk who somehow can lavish her with expensive rings and cruises while providing a lifestyle she simply can`t economically escape from.

She is beginning to sound like a female TIT..making up anything to fit the storyline of a given thread.

Well, that's what I'm not getting.

People legally blind have employment problems, and even if they're qualified to do something, they have to deal with discrimination, lack of opportunity, and so it's not likely a husband legally blind is making mountains of money.

So.....the husband is either legally blind, and those presents and cruise didn't happen, or those presents and cruise did happen, but the husband's not legally blind.

Remember, the husband was the one who took care of things when accompanying the greedy thorn primitive and her 8th-grade students on a trip to New York City and Washington, D.C.

She's pulling a stretchy, but I'm not sure what she's stretching here.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2008, 09:48:14 PM »
Quote
xxqqqzme  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Fri Jun-06-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2

11. SSI & SS disabilty are not welfare.
   
I get SS disability but that money is what I put into the system. I'm collecting.

Now THERE'S someone who has absolutely no understanding of math or the Social Security system.

 :thatsright:

Well, depending on the case, I'd say the majority of people receiving SSI or SS Disability aren't receiving "welfare". My father's STILL waiting for his disability after 5 months, and he paid into it for 40 years, to include 4 in the United States Marine Corps from 1969-1973.
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #9 on: June 06, 2008, 09:51:39 PM »
Well, depending on the case, I'd say the majority of people receiving SSI or SS Disability aren't receiving "welfare". My father's STILL waiting for his disability after 5 months, and he paid into it for 40 years, to include 4 in the United States Marine Corps from 1969-1973.

I believe what Tanker's referring to is this notion that one has paid a great deal of money into SSI and SS.

I haven't seen the latest numbers, but last time I checked, the "average" recipient got back within three months, all he had ever "paid into" the system when working.

And the squeezeme primitive, being a primitive, probably recovered her "investment" the first month.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19835
  • Reputation: +1616/-100
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #10 on: June 06, 2008, 09:55:02 PM »
Yet he is now a hopeless drunk who somehow can lavish her with expensive rings and cruises while providing a lifestyle she simply can`t economically escape from.

She is beginning to sound like a female TIT..making up anything to fit the storyline of a given thread.

Well, that's what I'm not getting.

People legally blind have employment problems, and even if they're qualified to do something, they have to deal with discrimination, lack of opportunity, and so it's not likely a husband legally blind is making mountains of money.

So.....the husband is either legally blind, and those presents and cruise didn't happen, or those presents and cruise did happen, but the husband's not legally blind.

Remember, the husband was the one who took care of things when accompanying the greedy thorn primitive and her 8th-grade students on a trip to New York City and Washington, D.C.

She's pulling a stretchy, but I'm not sure what she's stretching here.

My vision without the coke bottle glasses is 20/400 (that is as high as they measure,means you can`t see the E on the wall chart) but is correctable to 20/20 with glasses,so I am not legally blind.

Legally blind has to meet a certain criteria yet somehow in all her screeds and whinings this issue has never been alluded to before this?

Too much BS from her and am quite certain now that if there is a hopeless drunk in the household it isn`t Mr.greenbriar.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #11 on: June 06, 2008, 10:03:33 PM »
That's why I think she's pulling a stretchy on us, Carl, although I have no idea what her base motive might be.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2008, 10:05:28 PM »
She's stretching more than those size (readacted) jeans :-)
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19835
  • Reputation: +1616/-100
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2008, 10:21:13 PM »
That's why I think she's pulling a stretchy on us, Carl, although I have no idea what her base motive might be.

I would submit Frank that she is in a simple term......just nuts.
Her posting history is a bizarre one,plagerism,marital woes,being in love with a shipboard entertainer,inquiring about life insurance benefits and so on.

The primitives do at the very least provide an insight into the mind of the insane and wonder if they are being studied anywhere in acadamia.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2008, 11:21:39 PM »
Well, depending on the case, I'd say the majority of people receiving SSI or SS Disability aren't receiving "welfare". My father's STILL waiting for his disability after 5 months, and he paid into it for 40 years, to include 4 in the United States Marine Corps from 1969-1973.

I believe what Tanker's referring to is this notion that one has paid a great deal of money into SSI and SS.

I haven't seen the latest numbers, but last time I checked, the "average" recipient got back within three months, all he had ever "paid into" the system when working.

And the squeezeme primitive, being a primitive, probably recovered her "investment" the first month.

Exactly, Frank.  While people may have paid into it for many years, what they actually collect out of it for a person of average lifespan is generally vastly disproportionate to the person's true contributions plus any possible earnings on them, had it been used to purchase Treasury securities (for instance).  It would require SSA to have the beef-future trading acumen of a Hillary Clinton, and the freedom of action to use it in investing their FICA tax collections, to actually make the system work in the way those who are "only collecting their own contributions" think it does.  Those who make such claims have never run the numbers nor read up on it.  Over most of the life of Social Security, the FICA collections were much smaller than they are currently (though even a lifetime of contributions at the current level would be quickly exhausted, just not nearly as quickly).
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline InfamousAndy

  • Just Off Probation
  • *
  • Posts: 104
  • Reputation: +14/-5
  • The Friendly Christian
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #15 on: June 07, 2008, 07:09:05 AM »
Not to mention someone as young as myself is likely to pay into it most his life only to find it discontinued when they retire.  You do not get what you pay in, you get what hte current workers are paying in.  What you paid in goes to the people retiring at that moment in time.

Ironic, as one of Bush's primary agenda items in 2004 was to change SS into the ownership-based system that the DUmmies seem to think it is.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #16 on: June 07, 2008, 07:57:16 AM »
Exactly, Frank.  While people may have paid into it for many years, what they actually collect out of it for a person of average lifespan is generally vastly disproportionate to the person's true contributions plus any possible earnings on them, had it been used to purchase Treasury securities (for instance). 

It would require SSA to have the beef-future trading acumen of a Hillary Clinton, and the freedom of action to use it in investing their FICA tax collections, to actually make the system work in the way those who are "only collecting their own contributions" think it does.  Those who make such claims have never run the numbers nor read up on it.  Over most of the life of Social Security, the FICA collections were much smaller than they are currently (though even a lifetime of contributions at the current level would be quickly exhausted, just not nearly as quickly).

Thank you, Tanker.

My only experience with social security was a very long time ago, when my younger brother and I collected social security survivor's benefits, both parents never living long enough to get social security retirement benefits.

Both parents paid into the "system" from the time each of them started working.  As time went on, both parents had been assessed the maximum amount by circa August or September, and so didn't even have to pay more the last few months of each year.

So my younger brother and I got, I suppose, the then-maximum survivor's benefits, given the size of our late parents' "contributions."  My younger brother got them for about a year and a half, before he died in an automobile accident at the age of 17; I got them starting the same time he did, but received them until reaching the age of 22 years.

In college, I made a big deal about the "system;" about how it was a rip-off, and that I myself would never recover what I was paying into it (having worked and paid into the system since I was 14 years old).

Someone pointed out to me no, that was all wrong.

We looked at the numbers, what the parents had paid in, and what my younger brother had taken out, and what I was taking out.  I was surprised; remember, the parents had made the maximum "contributions" for quite a few years.

It seems that by the 4th month my younger brother and I received our checks, we had "exhausted" whatever the parents had put in, and all after that was gravy, money from other people's pockets.

I don't think most people, especially the primitives, understand that "contributions" to the system are actually minuscule when compared with what they get back.

And this is something that really is going to cripple Generation Y (those born after 1980), unless they decide to euthanize us or something.

apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: primitives on welfare
« Reply #17 on: June 07, 2008, 11:08:03 AM »
Exactly, Frank.  While people may have paid into it for many years, what they actually collect out of it for a person of average lifespan is generally vastly disproportionate to the person's true contributions plus any possible earnings on them, had it been used to purchase Treasury securities (for instance). 

It would require SSA to have the beef-future trading acumen of a Hillary Clinton, and the freedom of action to use it in investing their FICA tax collections, to actually make the system work in the way those who are "only collecting their own contributions" think it does.  Those who make such claims have never run the numbers nor read up on it.  Over most of the life of Social Security, the FICA collections were much smaller than they are currently (though even a lifetime of contributions at the current level would be quickly exhausted, just not nearly as quickly).

Thank you, Tanker.

My only experience with social security was a very long time ago, when my younger brother and I collected social security survivor's benefits, both parents never living long enough to get social security retirement benefits.

Both parents paid into the "system" from the time each of them started working.  As time went on, both parents had been assessed the maximum amount by circa August or September, and so didn't even have to pay more the last few months of each year.

So my younger brother and I got, I suppose, the then-maximum survivor's benefits, given the size of our late parents' "contributions."  My younger brother got them for about a year and a half, before he died in an automobile accident at the age of 17; I got them starting the same time he did, but received them until reaching the age of 22 years.

In college, I made a big deal about the "system;" about how it was a rip-off, and that I myself would never recover what I was paying into it (having worked and paid into the system since I was 14 years old).

Someone pointed out to me no, that was all wrong.

We looked at the numbers, what the parents had paid in, and what my younger brother had taken out, and what I was taking out.  I was surprised; remember, the parents had made the maximum "contributions" for quite a few years.

It seems that by the 4th month my younger brother and I received our checks, we had "exhausted" whatever the parents had put in, and all after that was gravy, money from other people's pockets.

I don't think most people, especially the primitives, understand that "contributions" to the system are actually minuscule when compared with what they get back.

And this is something that really is going to cripple Generation Y (those born after 1980), unless they decide to euthanize us or something.



Not me -- I have been paying the maximum for 18 years and a lot in the 12 years before that.  I calculate that to be around $100,000.  If I flatline it at 3,000 a year and then project a very modest 5% return, that is almost $700,000 I would have available.  The interest alone on that at 4% is 30,000 a year without touching principle -- that is to say forever and then I could bequeath the principle to whomever I want . 

The MAXIMUM SSI Payout would be around 800 a month, or a paltry $9,600 a year.  BUT that assumes I die today.  I will be working for another 30 years, so triple my pay-in.  I will have put in $300,000 and that covers 30 years (meaning I live to be 100). And I am afraid of how angry I will get if I project what I could have done with the money stolen from me under this Ponzi scheme.  Worse still, I will never see a dime and anyone younger than 50 who has SSI in his/her retirement planning is a fool.

Pretty stupid system, eh?



If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.