HawkeyeLibkid (66 posts)
You know what line I'm sick of hearing pertaining to gun regulation...
"Law abiding citizens"...
Abso****inlutley drives me up a wall. How many of these mass murderers were "law abiding citizens" until they sprayed a school or theater with bullets?
Just had to get it off my chest..
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251276546Well DUmmy let's take a look at this. When some maniac guns down a bunch of people they break every law in the book when they do so, so they obviously are not law abiding citizens and since they don't obey the laws in the first place just which of the new policies do you believe they will follow?
Secondly what you are doing is like if one of you goons gets all liquored up and drives their smart car into a group of kids and kills them, then after that happens you demand more restrictions on driving. Why should all the safe drivers who didn't kill anyone have to go through the hassle of a bunch of new laws designed to make idiots like you feel good?
SheilaT (11,761 posts)
1. Yep. And "responsible gun owners."
Apparently every single gun owner out there is responsible, even the ones who leave loaded guns where their toddlers can find them.
Damn you people are stupid. The "gun nuts" are the first to blame those people who are irresponsible with their guns for what happens, we simply don't think that just because there are idiots that our rights should be stripped from us. I wouldn't trust any of idiots with a crayon, yet I'm not going to try to outlaw sharp things just because you idiots will do something stupid with them.
Zoeisright (6,955 posts)
9. No shit.
There's no way we would have 30,000 gun deaths if most gun owners were "responsible." Guns = death. Period.
How many of those gun deaths are caused by Sons of 0bama who use them in gun free zones?