Of course it doesnt have answers because they didnt even attempt to find any. They didnt start with questions and then look to answer them, they started with a conclusion and made up questions that would fit it. The whole video asked slanted questions answered with conjecture backed up muted video with absolutely no context.
The fence sitters are worse than the conspiracy nuts, reminds me of all the people that make up these crazy implausible scenarios about Obama and then when some one calls them on it they just say "pray im wrong"
This has "truther" written all over it especially when they try to connect it to 9/11 which pretty much every single conspiracy question about that has been debunked now that its 11 years later and so much information has been released about it.
Most likely you are right, but sadly your argument started falling apart as you drug in 9/11, "truther" and I am surprised you did not bring up the birthers too and tying it to Obama somehow..
While the video certainly had some holes it clearly brings up some issues that does or should cause one to ponder and wonder. As I went thru it I certainly saw plenty to cause me to doubt. Take the smiling jovial attitude of some of the folks. We can attribute that to a natural reaction to extreme emotional trauma as in the loss of your 6 yr old child...some people react by burying the emotion and covering it up with a smile and a laugh. Something common in combat and in dealing with PTSD. I can assure you there is little time for tears and emotion in the mist of a fire fight. ASK ME HOW I KNOW!!!!!!
Sure, some of the video can be written off to time line etc etc. That said there is troubling issues, such as the 6 children in the guys house, no doubt there is an explanation and I am sure for all there is legit answers.
Much can be attributed to a lack of communications, no one person in charge, mixed stories from folks on the ground seeking some television time for themselves. The result is a grab bag of fact and wanna be facts, everyone wants to have the 'scoop' on the story. True much is sorted out over time, but things like this lingers on for years and constantly gets a new lease in life. I have noted in the past couple of days how many times I have heard that GHW Bush signed an Executive Order (banning certain guns) in 1989 and or 1990, when in fact he did not (I have examined the EO's signed by Bush over that time frame). So even 20+ years later the media has latched on to a phony fact probably spewed by some anti-gun org that was never true to begin with.
As for 9/11, that had little legitimacy to it, most just laughed it off as the stretch was way to far for even the common man to accept.
Like UFO's 97% can be explained, but its the 3% that cannot that causes the problem. SIDEBAR: I attended a meeting of an org I belong to and our guest speaker, who happens to live down the road from me was giving a talk. His talk was to debunk the Roswell UFO incident. In fact he is was the centerpiece of the govt/Air Force denial of Roswell. He is featured in the govt/Air Force report debunking the UFO's. The only problem with the story and the report (of which he had copies) is the timeline. He landed in a field not far from Roswell in a balloon and the gondola flipped over and his head got crushed, scalp nearly torn off and his head became swollen up to the size of a basketball. He was taken into Roswell and seen by a lot of people while in the small local hospital and lots fo military running around. And yes the pics of him truly did look like an alien. One problem in the story. This took place in 1959, NOT in 1947 the date of the Roswell incident...
