Author Topic: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)  (Read 1914 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Charles Henrickson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
  • Reputation: +633/-5
Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« on: January 11, 2013, 12:22:01 PM »
New DUFU up:

DUmmie FUnnies 01-11-13 (Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES!)


GRAYSON-WARREN 2016
No more teabaggers
like Obama or Clinton!
Co-host (with PJ-Comix) of the DUmmie FUnnies, both on Free Republic and at the DUmmie FUnnies' own blogspot.

Offline Charles Henrickson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
  • Reputation: +633/-5
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2013, 12:23:39 PM »
Prominently featured in this DUFU are DUmmies Ken Burch (the OP) and bluestate10 (his chief antagonist).
Co-host (with PJ-Comix) of the DUmmie FUnnies, both on Free Republic and at the DUmmie FUnnies' own blogspot.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2013, 12:29:14 PM »
I love this one . . .

Quote
Elizabeth Warren, Comanche-In-Chief!

H5 duly given, Charles!
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline delilahmused

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7384
  • Reputation: +1367/-80
  • Devil Mom
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2013, 12:58:23 PM »
Going to be laughing about this one all day:

[I sought the Sherrod, but I did not choose the Dem you need.]

 :lmao:  :lmao: :rotf:  :rotf:  :rotf:  :lmao:  :lmao:
"If God built me a ladder to heaven, I would climb it and elbow drop the world."
Mick Foley

"I am a very good shot. I have hunted for every kind of animal. But I would never kill an animal during mating season."
Hedy Lamarr

"I'm just like any modern woman trying to have it all. Loving husband, a family. It's just, I wish I had more time to seek out the dark forces and join their hellish crusade."
Morticia Addams

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17755
  • Reputation: +1899/-81
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2013, 01:44:08 PM »
Quote
OK...so you assume it's HRC or defeat. Sad.

[You know what makes me sad? You do! Maybe we should chug on over to I'm-a-DUmmie Land, where maybe we can find some reality for you, ya jackwagon!]


 :rofl: :lmao:

And Trumka/Krugman?   :mental:  Just rolls off the tongue, doesn't it?

Quote
Ugh!

[Is that you, Elizabeth Warren?]


 :lmao:

Too funny. 

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2013, 02:18:50 PM »
Ah, if only they would.  I can't imagine two more despicably unappealing candidates.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17755
  • Reputation: +1899/-81
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2013, 02:37:45 PM »
From the DUmmie thread:

Quote
Response to democrattotheend (Reply #64)
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 12:24 AM
 Ken Burch (30,136 posts)
99. I still don't understand why most of RFK's kids backed HRC.

She didn't care about ANY of the things Bobby lived and died for-she would never have gone to tarpaper shacks in Mississippi and held dying children in her arms, OR supported Cesar Chavez and the UFW. The dispossessed never mattered to her...they couldn't have mattered to her if she was willing to be on the WalMart B.O.D.
 Cesar Chavez?  What's the calender say?   :mental:

And just what good does holding a dying kid in a tarpaper shack do for the dying kid?  Sounds like a photo op to me, nothing more.  

Quote
Ken Burch (30,136 posts)
75. There's a clear mood, a growing mood, against corporate domination of life

And the public are sick of the wars...there's no massive majority for staying in Afghanistan or anywhere else in the Middle East.

And the polls have always shown majority support for single-payer.

 

Reality check:

Quote
regjoe (85 posts)
79. Give it a try

IMHO though, you are only seeing what you believe people want and ignoring what they do not want.

Afghanistan will not be a huge factor in the next election.
Polls that show support for single-payer have also shown no support for being taxed to pay for it.
Progressive gun control laws will be rejected by a great many of Democrats.
Unions do not have the support they once had.
Most Americans do not feel "dominated" by corporations. The lack of support for OWS and it fading away is proof of that.
 


Offline Charles Henrickson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
  • Reputation: +633/-5
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2013, 03:27:49 PM »
From the DUmmie thread. . . .

Here's a link straight to that thread:

If HRC runs in 2016, who should be the pro-worker, pro-peace, pro-justice candidate in the race?

I don't know if it was covered here in the Cave elsewhere.
Co-host (with PJ-Comix) of the DUmmie FUnnies, both on Free Republic and at the DUmmie FUnnies' own blogspot.

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2013, 04:43:38 PM »
Hillary for C-N-C......cankles and cellulite.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline Gern

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 454
  • Reputation: +92/-10
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2013, 05:25:29 PM »


Heh...

The best part is these two turds are class warriors, champions of the downtrodden, claiming to be for "the little guy..."

Warren has a net worth of $14.5 million, and Grayson is at $34.1 million.

The f'ing hypocrisy...


Offline Charles Henrickson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
  • Reputation: +633/-5
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2013, 11:27:05 PM »
Man, this Ken Burch goes on and on and on in this thread, about 45 or 46 posts, most all of them the same: It's not 1992 anymore, this is not a center-right country anymore, so let's go for a progressive candidate and not settle for the status quo, which is what "HRC" is. In his posts, Ken Burch refers to Hillary Clinton as "HRC" 23 times--23! Once he slips up and calls her "Clinton." But all the other times it's "HRC."

What's the story on Ken Burch anyhow? Is he in any way related to the infamous benburch? Did he model his screen name after benburch?
Co-host (with PJ-Comix) of the DUmmie FUnnies, both on Free Republic and at the DUmmie FUnnies' own blogspot.

Offline Charles Henrickson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
  • Reputation: +633/-5
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2013, 09:35:07 AM »
Warren has a net worth of $14.5 million. . . .

That heap big wampum! How did Princess Cherryblossoms get so rich? I thought she was just some sort of professor at Harvard. What, did she open her own casino?
Co-host (with PJ-Comix) of the DUmmie FUnnies, both on Free Republic and at the DUmmie FUnnies' own blogspot.

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2013, 10:57:53 AM »
That heap big wampum! How did Princess Cherryblossoms get so rich? I thought she was just some sort of professor at Harvard. What, did she open her own casino?

She earned it the old fashioned way....like every democrat.....she cheated on her taxes.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline diesel driver

  • Creepy Ass Cracker and Smart-Ass White Boy!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9130
  • Reputation: +609/-55
  • Enhancing My Carbon Footprint!
Re: Who in 2016? Hillary? NO! Grayson or Warren? YES! (New DUFU)
« Reply #13 on: January 12, 2013, 08:17:13 PM »
I must be getting old.

I remember when "HRC" stood for "Honda Racing Corporation"   :lmao:.

I wish it still did!
Murphy's 3rd Law:  "You can't make anything 'idiot DUmmie proof'.  The world will just create a better idiot DUmmie."

Liberals are like Slinkys.  Basically useless, but they do bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs...
 
Global warming supporters believe that a few hundred million tons of CO2 has more control over our climate than a million mile in diameter, unshielded thermo-nuclear fusion reactor at the middle of the solar system.

"A dead enemy is a peaceful enemy.  Blessed be the peacemakers". - U.S. Marine Corp

You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out of office.