Author Topic: primitives discuss lifetime Secret Service protection  (Read 1187 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
primitives discuss lifetime Secret Service protection
« on: January 10, 2013, 03:25:16 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022168513

Oh my.

Quote
JaneyVee (2,013 posts)    Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:47 PM

Obama signs law giving himself, Bush, Others lifetime Secret Service guard.

Former presidents have to give up rides on Air Force One. But now they don't have to give up being shadowed by the armed-and-earpieced bodyguards of the Secret Service.
 
President Barack Obama on Thursday signed into a law a measure giving him, George W. Bush and future former presidents and their spouses lifetime Secret Service protection, the White House announced.
 
The legislation, crafted by Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, rolls back a mid-1990s law that imposed a 10-year limit on Secret Service protection for former presidents. Bush would have been the first former commander in chief affected.
 
At the time, lawmakers who supported the measure said it would save the government millions of dollars. They also argued that former presidents could hire private security firms (as Richard Nixon did after he decided to forgo Secret Service protection in 1985).
 
The rest: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-signs-law-giving-himself-bush-lifetime-secret-184305122--politics.html

Quote
gollygee (11,373 posts)   Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:49 PM

3. Good

Honestly, crazies might still go after W in a few years, and of course they might go after Obama 8 years after he's out of office. I think this is very wise. They still need to be protected, regardless of party.

Quote
Recursion (20,640 posts)    Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:57 PM

8. I thought they already had that?

It surprises me that this wasn't already the case.

Quote
jeff47 (5,875 posts)   Thu Jan 10, 2013, 03:00 PM

10. They did, it got turned off during the Clinton administration, and now it's back on.

Since it passed during Clinton's time in office, W would have been the first one affected by the new law.

Quote
Crazy Combo (7 posts)   Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:59 PM

9. Obama should have signed for himself, and not for Chimp.

Taxpayers should not have to be paying for the Chimp to have Secret Service. Just dump him in a bar and 100,000 cash, and he'll be fine right there.

Quote
benld74 (4,133 posts)    Thu Jan 10, 2013, 03:07 PM

13. Gawd, it would suck to be W's SS man wouldn't it?

Quote
Paladin (7,651 posts)    Thu Jan 10, 2013, 03:17 PM

14. Obama's Secret Service Detail Will Be In Harms Way A Lot More Than W's.

If you're just talking about which ex-president will be better company, you have a point: the guy with a functioning brain is preferable.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline FlippyDoo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2479
  • Reputation: +1262/-14
  • Your president, too.
Re: primitives discuss lifetime Secret Service protection
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2013, 03:59:24 PM »
If guns are banned why would secret service protection still be required for any one? I thought banning guns would make everyone sit around and sing Kumbaya.
Fictional spirit-guiding by appointment.
conservativecave.com & conservativeunderground.com

For new members and lurkers: I am a fictional spirit-guide with no smell whatsoever. I am part irish setter and part pigeon. If you don't smell any strange smells it means I'm probably standing next to you. As I am a fictional character anything I post should possibly be considered fictional.

Offline IassaFTots

  • In WTF-istan, I am considered a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13972
  • Reputation: +770/-274
  • Oh well, I wasn't using my civil liberties anyway.
Re: primitives discuss lifetime Secret Service protection
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2013, 04:01:13 PM »
If guns are banned why would secret service protection still be required for any one? I thought banning guns would make everyone sit around and sing Kumbaya.

Maybe we need to ask the preezy that question.  What WAS he thinking????
R.I.P. LC and Crockspot.  Miss you guys.

The infinite is possible at zombocom.  www.zombo.com

"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." ~ Martin Luther King
 
“Political Correctness is about turning a blind eye to painful reality because your comfortable feelings are more important to you than saving lives and providing quality of life to people who work their ass off to be productive and are a benefit to this great American Dream"  ~Ted Nugent

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: primitives discuss lifetime Secret Service protection
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2013, 04:04:29 PM »
Quote
Paladin (7,651 posts)    Thu Jan 10, 2013, 03:17 PM

14. Obama's Secret Service Detail Will Be In Harms Way A Lot More Than W's.

If you're just talking about which ex-president will be better company, you have a point: the guy with a functioning brain is preferable.

Once the strings are removed from Obama, he will sit there like a slack-jawed DUmmie. I'm willing to bet that Secret Service agents will gladly work for the Bush's, not so much the Obama's.

OTOH, some agents might like that cushy life in Hawaii when Obama retires.

Most of the crazy violent people are on the left, but their insanity allows them to target their own to martyr them, so Obama is likely to be in more danger.

Offline 67 Rover

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6479
  • Reputation: +1719/-41
Re: primitives discuss lifetime Secret Service protection
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2013, 04:05:46 PM »
Maybe we need to ask the preezy that question.  What WAS he thinking????

What was the person that is about to start the next revolution thinking?  Well of himself and protecting his own ass of course.

NRA Benefactor member
G.O.A. Life member
G.O.A.L. Life member
Certified Law Enforcement Sig Armorer

Offline IassaFTots

  • In WTF-istan, I am considered a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13972
  • Reputation: +770/-274
  • Oh well, I wasn't using my civil liberties anyway.
Re: primitives discuss lifetime Secret Service protection
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2013, 04:10:30 PM »
What was the person that is about to start the next revolution thinking?  Well of himself and protecting his own ass of course.



That's the way I see it.
R.I.P. LC and Crockspot.  Miss you guys.

The infinite is possible at zombocom.  www.zombo.com

"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy." ~ Martin Luther King
 
“Political Correctness is about turning a blind eye to painful reality because your comfortable feelings are more important to you than saving lives and providing quality of life to people who work their ass off to be productive and are a benefit to this great American Dream"  ~Ted Nugent

Offline Delmar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5295
  • Reputation: +592/-41
Re: primitives discuss lifetime Secret Service protection
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2013, 05:57:42 PM »
I suppose that they might as well give the simpleton his teleprompter for life too--maybe then he won't embarrass us all as much after he's gone from office.
We will make America strong again. We will make America proud again. We will make America safe again. And we will make America great again.

Donald Trump

Offline WinOne4TheGipper

  • Enemy of DU
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2603
  • Reputation: +171/-59
Re: primitives discuss lifetime Secret Service protection
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2013, 06:29:28 PM »
So, the guy with the functioning brain would be preferable?  So they'd take the Harvard and Yale grad who actually ran things effectively over the pretend professor?
“Sometimes the curses of the godless sound better than the hallelujahs of the pious.”

Martin Luther