I love days like today, I really do. The sun is shining, the temperature is moderate, and I don't have to do any type of aerobic exercise since I have DUmp democrats throwing around their ignorance to raise my heart rate and blood pressure.
NNguyenMD (1,163 posts)
Do CCL folks seriously believe their handgun...
Does this DUmp rat seriously expect us to believe he's a MD?
with maybe 1 or 2 clips can take a nut case experienced in handling an AR-15 with a bunch of high capacity clips.
Yes. Nobody is invincible and holding an assault "riffle" does not render one the automatic winner in close range combat. A .45 hollow point round does not give a shit what
you're holding.
I can see that gun fight ending real soon.
Given the proper sight picture and tactical advantage, so can I, DUmbass - in my favor.
They might be able to hold off a homicidal gunman ong enough so that THEY can get away. But its not like they're all highly trained snipers who can hit anything while getting shot at and a bunch of people running for their lives.
One does not have to be a highly trained sniper at 35 to 50 feet, DUmmie. Most of us who legally carry practice at those distances as well as up close and personal. By the way, DUmmie, you are giving the lunatic gunman way too much credit.
You might not be able to put down a feral obamaite, but there are many who can.
And they are armed.
Then the next thing you'll hear is the gun lobby advocating carrying assaults weapons in public sanctuaries! And then the arms race will just keep escalating.
Spare me the hyperbolic drama queenery, you craven child. What I pray happens is that a state/locality with some courage to set a standard for the rest to follow decides that criminal free fire zones are hurting their law abiding citizens more than helping them. When criminals realize "hey, there may be someone in there that can shoot back", then they'll go look for the nearest blue shithole to target practice.
That's what I want to see, DUmbass, and it won't have to involve assault rifles.
Sekhmets Daughter (2,112 posts)
17. Because what every parent
wants for their children is for them to have a teacher capable of killing another human being...<<sigh>>
Better than having to plant them in the ground, stupid. I would much rather children see a weapon carried and used in the right fashion than watch blood soaked liberal fantasies in the movie theaters.
Warpy (66,112 posts)
15.
Slowing the shooter down by reducing the number of rounds per minute and the size of the clips would give people more time to act, either by tackling him, smacking him over the head with a heavy object, or any other means.
Uh, no. You must still be using the stash of pharmaceuticals you swiped from your last job, DUmmie, because that's one of the stupidest things I have read from you cretins in a while.
Making laws that reduce the size of "clips" (
) does nothing to a criminal who has
no regard for the ****ing law to begin with. The elementary school that boy shot up was a "gun free zone", how'd that particular law work out, opiate freak?
Slowing these squirrels down might just be the best we can do at this point.
Slowing them down to dead stop is the preferred course of action, DUmbass. A trained, law abiding citizen could do that. Unless they've been disarmed by the cowardly liberals first, that is.
I want to share something with you lurking fart sniffers. Just this past weekend, someone asked me just how it is we can really keep the crazies from getting guns. I told this person that I didn't understand what the Hell they were talking about since the ritalin chewer who shot up the school had to steal the guns he used. I had to explain to this individual that the background checks work pretty damned well since Mr Lanza was denied a purchase of a firearm. Enforcement of existing laws would go a lot further than trying to restrict the rights of law abiding citizens to protect themselves and their families.
When I disabused this person of that bit of ignorance, she asked me "well then, what do we do to keep them from hurting innocent people". This one is relatively easy to answer. First of all, you harden a target. A show of force will do more to deter an attack than having to jerk a weapon and pull the trigger. Those who would shoot up a mall or an elementary school are unbalanced cowards to begin with since they think they don't have anyone who will shoot back. If that doesn't work and the criminal is bent on killing, then you keep these sons of obinga from killing with one 165 grain hollow point round at a time. Anyone who is stupid enough to come after a person holding a gun needs to assume room temperature with a quickness.
We have to live with the results of decades of your philosophies, DUmmies. Until we can restore some kind of normalcy to society, we have to be on guard against the refuse you have spawned.
