Nads - how to win friends and influence people...

[formerlurker]

nadinbrzezinski (112,334 posts)
33. Are you that ingnorant of history?

View profile
In fact, Nader did not outperform anybody. If anybody in recent history did, he had funny ears, and spoke with a Texas accent, and may very well have guaranteed Clinton's victory. That was the closest ever to the Bull Moose performance in recent history.

Jaysus, you really do not like democracy. What if voters decide, please do follow this bouncy ball, one of these years, to VOTE FOR A THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE in such high numbers, across all 52 state elections, that NEITHER of the two major party candidates wins the election? Would you consider that a fraud? I suspect you would... MY GOD MY PREFERRED PARTY LOST!

Is it possible? Yes, likely, not presently, and some of that has to do with how the system is designed and how the two parties have futzed with laws.

But damn it, you really are a hard core partisan...

So what happens to those good democrats who voted for I don't know the bull moose II candidate? Are they to be lined up and shot?

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1874040

 

nadinbrzezinski (112,335 posts)
59. What if...perish the though, Hillary don't run?

View profile

Last edited Sat Nov 24, 2012, 12:36 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I am not going to predict who is running in 2016, and if you had half a brain...oh wait Nader...you'd know that the next election is in 2014...oh wait, only POTUS matters.

As Earl told you, go to bed...and lord help your party if all your eggs are only in presidential elections...cough is that a Nader stuck in your throat

Star Member graham4anything (2,085 posts)
62. Vote for Michelle. And keep Chicago together.Remember, Chicago wins elections and is a good word

View profile
and ONLY vote in 2014 for democrats or in the rare instances, those 3rd party candidates who will caucus ONLY with democrats in the case where either the Dems do not put a candidate up, or the dem is a fringe dem who can NOT win (ala Meek in Florida couldn't win, but Charlie I spit in Jebs face 2x Crist would have).

and being that we are conversing-might as well add for good luck.
and if the choice between 2 dems is one that leans toward the NRA and one that leans against the NRA vote for the one against guns, which are WMDs and which are built to kill.

remember, a gun is a rightwing tool and ask yourself,

how many of the great million man marchers in DC a decade or so ago, would have been allowed to march stroking their gun like 3rdparty teaparty/libertarians did in 2008 outside town hall meetings. (the answer is ZERO).

anyhow, good morning.
Rise and shine. It's 3am in the east, a beautiful day begins and its a Saturday.

graham4anything - late attempt for DOTY?

nadinbrzezinski (112,335 posts)
65. And Michelle is running?

View profile
Jaysus!!!!

Star Member graham4anything (2,085 posts)
69. 2025-2032. Michelle46, followed by Chelsea47 after Hillary45 and President Obama44 retire

View profile

Last edited Sat Nov 24, 2012, 02:34 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
and later on, Sasha and Mailia

nadinbrzezinski (112,335 posts)
73. We call that a coronation, not an election

View profile
You should read some history on royalty.

...and the reason why Nads is a front runner for DOTY, 2012:

nadinbrzezinski (112,335 posts)
68. RUUUNNNN. COMIES UNDER MY BED!!!

View profile

Last edited Sat Nov 24, 2012, 12:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)
So if we even think that facts actually happened, like the SCOTUS issuing a decision in Bush v Gore that was supposed not to be precedent...that we are far left commies?

I love red baiting in the morning.

By the way, I am actually, like for real, a reporter. One of my local beats IS City Hall. I deal with actual, well you know...pesky facts. One of those pesky facts is the USSC stopped the count, not Nader. You can jump all you want up and down, it is simply not so. Another is that the NYT did indeed publish on 9/11 a report where Gore actually, I know shocking, won Florida.

In the reality we happen to live the OH servers did indeed go dark both in 2004 and 2012. We know in 2004 Kerry was leading and when they came back up Bush was leading. We know the data stream did go through servers in TN that night. These are facts.

We know that this year the servers went dark at exactly the same time.

We also know there was vote flipping in the spring during the Republican primaries.

If that makes me a commie, that is understanding the facts...are you now doing the McCarthy thing? Have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?

I can tell you this...nor is this an ad hominen, this s a fact. You really have no clue how the political system works. None, who is a professional observer is willing to say who will run in 2016. We have very early explorations, both Santorum (has a website up already likely more to retire his debt) and Rubio (went to OH already) are thinking about it.

In the dem side none has made any. What SOS Clinton has indicated is tat she needs a long vacation. We will not know for at least two years (2014 hmmm) if she's even thinking about it. Michelle? Now cue the laughtract. Why would any voter cast their vote for POTUS for her? Being FLOYUS hardly qualifies. She might run for office to get both a record and experience. That won't happen before 2018.

So that is how the real world works.

By the way, I guess in your case facts have a commie bent.

I have not been called a far left in a long time...well, thank you. I should feel honored.

(Oh and did not chose to go into the whole screed on Welstone...performance act indeed

Oh and I will go into Mexico. The President is NOT Fox, he hasn't been in 6 years. The current President, Calderon, just wants to change the official name, going to 1824, Estados Unidos Mexicanos, to Mexico.

Get's worst. Looked at a map lately? You want to make a country of over 90 million, with 32 States and one Federal District a single state in the US? You and what army? Oh and unlike DC, that Federal District, otherwise known as Mexico City, now self rules and has full representation in the Mexican Congress and Senate. We could learn a lesson with DC.

She is actually, like for real, a reporter.   Pinky swear honest.

[BEG]

No better word but prick...she is a condescending prick.


Oh and Nadine, it's WORSE not worst. I know you read this forum, how many times do we have to point this out?  And to think, you are actually, like a "for real" reporter. 

[franksolich]

What's this about "52 state elections"?

[Mr Mannn]

What's this about "52 state elections"?

Yeah. Its supposed to be 57.

[tanstaafl]

What's this about "52 state elections"?

She might be thinkin' PR and Mexico are, like, states. Like that'll ever happen

[JakeStyle]

She seems really to be really angry.

[franksolich]

She seems really to be really angry.

It's all good though.

[NHSparky]

That was the closest ever to the Bull Moose performance in recent history.

Hmmmm...1912 was the closest a 3rd party candidate got to affecting the outcome of a presidential election?

Oh, I dunno about that...seems to me had all those idiot Nader voters gone to Gore we'd have had him and not Bush in the WH on 9/11.

And going back to 1968, anyone remember the American Independence Party, George Wallace, shit like that?  That the difference in popular vote between Nixon and Humphrey was less than 1 percent?

Then there were the Dixiecrats and Strom Thurmond back in 1948, etc., etc...

Finally, back to Nads little "close" claim.  Had TR not run under the Bull Moose Party, there would have been no split of the Republican vote and Wilson would more than likely not been elected.

[EagleKeeper]

I'd like to just take this opportunity to recommend to the crazy bald dwarf that Google chrome has a built in spell checker.

gNads, it really would help a bit to make your posts somewhat more legible.

Of course that won't help you much with syntax and grammar...baby steps gNads, baby steps.

[Chris_]

I'd like to just take this opportunity to recommend to the crazy bald dwarf that Google chrome has a built in spell checker.

She broke it.

[Skul]

Google chrome spell-checker has her on its iggy list.

[GOBUCKS]

Hmmmm...1912 was the closest a 3rd party candidate got to affecting the outcome of a presidential election?

Oh, I dunno about that...seems to me had all those idiot Nader voters gone to Gore we'd have had him and not Bush in the WH on 9/11.

And going back to 1968, anyone remember the American Independence Party, George Wallace, shit like that?  That the difference in popular vote between Nixon and Humphrey was less than 1 percent?

Then there were the Dixiecrats and Strom Thurmond back in 1948, etc., etc...

Finally, back to Nads little "close" claim.  Had TR not run under the Bull Moose Party, there would have been no split of the Republican vote and Wilson would more than likely not been elected.

Don't forget the brain-dead morons who voted for Ross Perot gave us Clinton.

[RobJohnson]

I think she has Ross Perot's ears confused with Ralph Nader.

Or she is just confused 100% of the time.

graham4anything says that guns are WMD.....  

[NHSparky]

Don't forget the brain-dead morons who voted for Ross Perot gave us Clinton.

She had already referenced that.  Then again, she and the other libtards are probably going to stick with their oft-debunked claim that it made no difference and that Clinton would have won anyway, despite the fact that exit polls at the time showed Perot voters were breaking away from Bush more than 3-1 over Clinton; meaning Bush would in fact have won, and won big.

As much as I despise the toe-sucker Dick Morris, he is correct in one observation--in Presidential elections, third-party candidates almost always break AWAY from the incumbent/party towards the challenger.

[Skul]

Star Member graham4anything (2,085 posts)
62. Vote for Michelle. And keep Chicago together.Remember, Chicago wins elections and is a good word Chicago politics are sooo transparent, yup.

and ONLY vote in 2014 for democrats or in the rare instances, those 3rd party candidates who will caucus ONLY with democrats in the case where either the Dems do not put a candidate up, or the dem is a fringe dem who can NOT win (ala Meek in Florida couldn't win, but Charlie I spit in Jebs face 2x Crist would have). Smokin' bad weed again

and being that we are conversing-might as well add for good luck.
and if the choice between 2 dems is one that leans toward the NRA and one that leans against the NRA vote for the one against guns, which are WMDs and which are built to kill. Gee, I wonder why a socialist whiner would be afraid of private firearm ownership?

remember, a gun is a rightwing tool and ask yourself, It's a Second Amendment right granted to all people, regardless of their politics, DUmbass.

how many of the great million man marchers in DC a decade or so ago, would have been allowed to march stroking their gun like 3rdparty teaparty/libertarians did in 2008 outside town hall meetings. (the answer is ZERO). Umm, DUmbass, that was DC, where a decade ago even having a photo of a gun was almost a felony.
anyhow, good morning. Up yours.
Rise and shine. It's 3am in the east, a beautiful day begins and its a Saturday. Harvest time in the greenhouse downstairs?

Would be a shoe-in had the little piker started his run earlier.

[Mr Mannn]

I'd like to just take this opportunity to recommend to the crazy bald dwarf that Google chrome has a built in spell checker.

If you have a mole you will know that DU has a spell checker too. just click a button before you hit enter.
But since liberals are so much smarter than us conservatives...they never use it.

[Aristotelian]

Google chrome spell-checker has her on its iggy list.

Other way around - haven't you noticed that anybody who disagrees gets put on the iggy list?

Just like the entire metric system is on the iggy list for claiming that there are 100 centimetres in a metre.

[Skul]

Other way around - haven't you noticed that anybody who disagrees gets put on the iggy list?

Just like the entire metric system is on the iggy list for claiming that there are 100 centimetres in a metre.

Worth one.