Sat Nov 17, 2012, 03:35 AM
graham4anything (1,832 posts)
Spielberg's LINCOLN the movie-Needing the other side,& Presidential war time power(like today)
Run and see this movie
Go for the directing (Spielberg), acting- Daniel Day Lewis, Tommy Lee Jones, Sally Field all possible academy award winners again for this
Go for the costumes, the cinematography
and marvel at what this story is showing
President Lincoln=President FDR=Rev.Dr. King=President LBJ=President Obama
then=2012
and it's a slam bang message to those on the far left, showing how the far left can be as bad as the far right
It is showing that the eye on the prize is what is important, and getting there, do anything needed to get the legislation passed, even if it means going right to the other party to secure their votes BY ANY MEANS NEEDED &/or COMPROMISING with the other party.
And using special war time presidential powers that the constitution gives a president during a time of war (very relevant today).
AND SOUND REASONING/LOGIC working within the system to build a better tomorrow.
It is an amazing story of the fight for the 13th amendment, the abolishment of slavery.
And showed that President Lincoln, like President Obama now, painstakeningly made the case, and when the case needed a little more explanation, painstakingly made the words fit into legal, sound reasoning.
It so reminded me of how the far left has said today, well, President Obama didn't get 100% of this,
therefore he sucks type thinking.
NO, it showed the line I have used for years now
10% of something is better than 100% of nothing.
And the quote in my signature from President Lincoln himself, rings so true
We could not secure the good we did secure if we grasped for more-President Lincoln
and Tommy Lee Jones as Rep. Thaddeus Stevens,well, it's a name everyone should look up a bio of this person, if they don't already know his life story.(and note the exteme likeness the actor had toward looking like this past leader who was the only house member ever to be called a "great dictator").
And marvel at how Spielberg shows Lincoln to put forth to the people, the question of,
did LIncoln overreach his position and go above/beyond his presidential powers by saying,
it was 18 months prior to the election, and the people voted whether his Presidency did step over that line or not, and gave a resounding reelection to President Lincoln (meaning they approved of what the president did and felt it was within the lines of WARTIME POWERS that the Constitution affords the president.
(and note that back then republican=today's democrat and then democrat=today's republicans which I noted seemed to confuse some in the packed movie theatre we saw the film in yesterday
And of course, shows racism and sexism rearing it's ugly head, much like today's republicantealibertarians want to bring back the ORIGINAL BOR and get rid of ALL the amendments other than the original ones. And take away the vote from blacks, women and anyone but "the master race" type thinking the racists have.
I saw this movie last night and it is a really good movie. I knew that the democrats were going to have to do some fast talking to explain away how the democrats were the bad guys and the republicans were the good guys--that's different than the template from the usual Hollywood movie. As much as it pained Steven Speilberg to do it, there was no getting around the facts--democrats were for slavery and the republicans were against it. The best that Speilberg could do was delay the release of the movie until after the election.
It seems to me that the DUmmies have decided to go with a two pronged attack on the true events of the historical period this movie shows:
1.
President Lincoln=President FDR=Rev.Dr. King=President LBJ=President Obama
then=2012
Obama=Lincoln. Laughable. Obama would have to stand on Biden's shoulders to kiss Abe Lincoln's ass.
2.
and note that back then republican=today's democrat and then democrat=today's republicans
When confronted with the ugly history of their party, the democrats are quick to whip out this whopper. DUmmies, the democrats and the republicans haven't swapped ideologies, get that through your thick skulls. How come--to this day--the democrats have annual Jackson Day fundraising dinners? Shouldn't they have switched to Lincoln Day dinners if they had really abandoned their poisonous ideology? No, they can't, because the Lincoln Day dinner tradition is already taken--by the REPUBLICANS!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021836948You pathetic liars just go ahead and keep on telling yourselves the lie. From another LINCOLN thread:
Response to dsc (Reply #4)Fri Nov 16, 2012, 10:06 PM
RBInMaine (9,109 posts)
5. The ideologies of the parties have swapped over time.The early Republicans were social progressives.
Response to dsc (Reply #4)Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:09 AM
ceejdre82 (145 posts)
28. but they were a very different kind of republican back then...and what the South considered democrat
Last edited Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:10 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
s shared a lot of the republican ideology of today....it amazes me how progressive Lincoln was.
Desperation tactic.
p.s. I thought I should include this, our old chum has weighed in with an endorsement of the movie in this second thread:
Response to RBInMaine (Original post)Fri Nov 16, 2012, 10:11 PM
Omaha Steve (33,804 posts)
7. Marta and I saw it at noon
The theater was 1/2 full. Great turnout for that time of day on a Friday. It was a mostly older than us crowd. It is everything that has been said about it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021835739