DUmmies Discuss Another Stolen Election

[GOBUCKS]

On a quiet Sunday morning, a small group of nameless, faceless, useless unterprimitiven gather to discuss voting on Republican-owned and -operated machines: 

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:40 AM
sellitman (8,994 posts)

Why has the DOJ & PBO done nothing to stop TAINTED Voting Machines from being used?

Where is Holder?

Is the fix in already?

Is this election already in the books?

****, what the hell is going on in this Country?

HOW MANY ELECTIONS MUST WE ENDURE THAT ARE TAINTED BY GOP CONTROLLED MACHINES?

Is this a Country's politics just a huge charade?

 
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002159239
Since the DUmp discredited Bev Harris, denying her the final ten bucks needed to expose a stolen election, and since coach whacked the round red sodomite, the DUmmies are defenseless.

And PBO = Peanut Butter and......?

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:46 AM
Flashmann (737 posts)
1. I'd like to imagine

The strategy is to give them the rope to hang themselves REALLY good.....

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:54 AM
Esse Quam Videri (459 posts)
3. How can anyone in Ohio believe their vote is being counted correctly?

I need to inquire as to what kind of machines we use in Republican controlled Douglas county. Luckily even if they are the Hart machines we are voting by paper mail in ballot. So there would actually be a piece of paper to look at in the event of a recount.

How can anyone in Ohio doubt their vote is counted properly?

Raw vote totals from every precinct in Ohio are processed through proprietary Diebold software before being transmitted to central tabulators, to be certain the count is perfect. 

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 09:56 AM
Voice for Peace (7,219 posts)
4. it's hard to believe the DOJ wouldn't be aware of these machines

and it's equally hard for me to believe they wouldn't do anything, so I am really stumped.

Amazing. A DUmpmonkey? Stumped?

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:08 AM
brooklynite (10,880 posts)
6. How about...nobody claims the machines are tainted...

...seriously. Show me a candidate or Party official who claims that they lost an election because of rigged voting machines. And explain how those same voting machines let us win in 2006 and 2008.

 

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:19 AM
INdemo (3,054 posts)
8. If they steal it I think the protests will make the 60's look like a

church social.

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:33 AM
wiggs (4,306 posts)
11. Huge, important, and unanswered question. Dems, and Conyers in particular, were very

concerned about vote integrity up until 2006 when voted into power. Since then....zip.

I had almost forgotten about the Conyers Broomcloset Hearings.

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 10:49 AM
duhneece (1,336 posts)
15. How many states, like NM, demanded voter-verified auditable ballots?

And how many still rely on 'black box' voting with no auditable trail?

The thing is, if anyone starts asking too many questions, coach will put 'em on ice.

Never forget the round red sodomite, DUmmies.

[Ralph Wiggum]

If "we" were going to steal elections, what the hell happened in 2008? ???

[Linda]

I noticed there was no talk of a stolen election until obama started dropping in the polls....so I guess this will be the only explanation they will accept for him losing...the election was stolen...not that people woke up and voted his sorry ass out.

[Dori]

I'm confused

Current polls are saying that Romeny is up 2 over Obama in Ohio.

FOX news just reported that 1/3 of Ohio has voted in their early voting, and that Obama is leading 62% to 32%.

How is that possible?

[miskie]

Hey - you primitives need to wait until we steal it before blaming us. - Sure, stealing the election is pretty high on the agenda, but until it happens, we didn't do it.   

[Kyle Ricky]

2008 was the year of the biggest recorded election fraud, and the most stolen election, in history. And all the illegal votes went to obama. They are so stupid....

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

If "we" were going to steal elections, what the hell happened in 2008? ???

Obama had too wide a margin to effectively steal it from him.

After all, you can't dispute a 106% voter turn-out, can you?

[Freeper]

I'm confused

Current polls are saying that Romeny is up 2 over Obama in Ohio.

FOX news just reported that 1/3 of Ohio has voted in their early voting, and that Obama is leading 62% to 32%.

How is that possible?

Don't worry the machines will fix it on Election Day.

[Kyle Ricky]

Obama had too wide a margin to effectively steal it from him.

After all, you can't dispute a 106% voter turn-out, can you?

When you have districts saying that more people voted for obama than who actually live there, you know something illegal is happening.

[Texacon]

I'm confused

Current polls are saying that Romeny is up 2 over Obama in Ohio.

FOX news just reported that 1/3 of Ohio has voted in their early voting, and that Obama is leading 62% to 32%.

How is that possible?

I don't understand that number either.  They don't start counting until election day.

KC

[Kyle Ricky]

I'm confused

Current polls are saying that Romeny is up 2 over Obama in Ohio.

FOX news just reported that 1/3 of Ohio has voted in their early voting, and that Obama is leading 62% to 32%.

How is that possible?

I don't understand that number either.  They don't start counting until election day.

KC

They are probably going by party member numbers who voted already. They don't know who they voted for, but they should know what party each who voted is part of? And they are assuming they voted according to their party.

[Karin]

How do they know that?  And what do they do about Independents? 

[Kyle Ricky]

How do they know that?  And what do they do about Independents? 

I'm not sure about other places, but here when I voted, they always asked what party I was a member of before giving me my ballot. They also have the party I am a member of in their role call book.

[Jasonw560]

I'm not sure about other places, but here when I voted, they always asked what party I was a member of before giving me my ballot. They also have the party I am a member of in their role call book.

If I remember correctly, in Texas at least, if you've voted in one party's primary, you're counted in that party. They also go by what party you voted for last time. It's probably the same there.

[GOBUCKS]

I'm confused

Current polls are saying that Romeny is up 2 over Obama in Ohio.

FOX news just reported that 1/3 of Ohio has voted in their early voting, and that Obama is leading 62% to 32%.

How is that possible?

It means ACORN has focused on bringing to the polls busloads of savages from the Cleveland, Toledo, Akron, and Youngstown projects.

One hopes they will be limited to a single vote each.

[franksolich]

Ho hum.

Another stolen election.

Yawn.

<<bored.

[BlueStateSaint]

I'm confused

Current polls are saying that Romeny is up 2 over Obama in Ohio.

FOX news just reported that 1/3 of Ohio has voted in their early voting, and that Obama is leading 62% to 32%.

How is that possible?

Exit polls?  We know how well that turned out for the primitives in 2004 . . .

[Skul]

I'm confused

Current polls are saying that Romeny is up 2 over Obama in Ohio.

FOX news just reported that 1/3 of Ohio has voted in their early voting, and that Obama is leading 62% to 32%.

How is that possible?

Simple, they only polled those that identified themselves as dems.
I don't think they were expecting the results they got.

[Duke Nukum]

If "we" were going to steal elections, what the hell happened in 2008? ???

We racist rethuglicans had messed up the economy so much they only way out was to elect a black man to pin the blame on.

Never mind that we are rational beings and the farthest thing from racist but when one lives by the Conspiracy Theory, one goes deranged by the Conspiracy Theory.