CIA TOLD D.C. BENGHAZI ATTACK NOT SPONTANEOUS WITHIN 24 HOURS

[txradioguy]

The CIA is indicating that they told Washington the Benghazi attack was militant in nature, rather than spontaneous, within 24 hours of its occurrence.

According to a report released today, the "CIA station chief in Libya" alerted Washington that the attack was not in response to a video.

However, media outlets are doing their best to leave Obama a little wiggle room by claiming "it is unclear who, if anyone, saw the cable outside the CIA at that point." In other words, the station manager sent the alert, but there's no hard evidence anyone saw the alert in Washington.

Quick question: What does it say about the culture within the Obama administration if, in fact, they ignored or didn't even look at the CIA alert?

The CIA station chief did his job and compiled a report within 24 hours based on eye-witness interviews. This is going make it much, much harder for the mainstream media to blame the intelligence community for Benghazi.


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/19/CIA-Told-Washington-Benghazi-Attack-Was-Not-Spontaneous-Within-24-Hours

[docstew]

Sounds like a CIA station chief needs to resign in protest and start making speeches

[txradioguy]

Sounds like a CIA station chief needs to resign in protest and start making speeches

Sounds to me like General Petraeus doesn't like looking at the underside of the Obama Bus.

[docstew]

Sounds to me like General Petraeus doesn't like looking at the underside of the Obama Bus.

Well, O should have known that you don't throw a Ranger under the bus. He's likely to set a thermite grenade on it as he rolls out the other side.

[txradioguy]

Well, O should have known that you don't throw a Ranger under the bus. He's likely to set a thermite grenade on it as he rolls out the other side.

Don't mess with the Rakkasans!

[NHSparky]

Ah, but that's their story and they're sticking to it.  A five-year old 1--can lie better than this, 2--knows when to give up because he's been caught.

[ironhorsedriver]

What I don't get is, why did he lie, and continue to do so, about the attack? There is no reason to, he loses nothing by telling the truth, but loses with his lies. I can't figure this hypocrite out, at all.

[txradioguy]

What I don't get is, why did he lie, and continue to do so, about the attack? There is no reason to, he loses nothing by telling the truth, but loses with his lies. I can't figure this hypocrite out, at all.

He has to run around lying because he's been saying we defeated al-Qaeda in his stump speeches.  The whole "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive" meme.

For him to say this was an al-Qaeda attack after he's said we defeated them would not look good.

So they had to blame it on a movie no one has seen. 

[Lacarnut]

He has to run around lying because he's been saying we defeated al-Qaeda in his stump speeches.  The whole "Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive" meme.

For him to say this was an al-Qaeda attack after he's said we defeated them would not look good.

So they had to blame it on a movie no one has seen. 

That is it in a nutshell plus he could care less about the four American that were killed because the sorry SOB is a Muzzie sympathizer.

[Flufferlie]

Exactly. Lost American Lives are viewed as "not optimal" in Obama's mind.
It is quite unreal actually, this has to surpass watergate as far as cover ups and lies are concerned. They have had to cover up the cover up!!!
Hillary throwing herself under the bus was one of the many lows of it all. And it is no real surprise that the CIA has gotten fed up with being blamed for the issue.
Obama keeps pointing fingers at the state department and intelligence agencies.

[Ptarmigan]

So much complicitness. This just gets more disturbing.