Hey asshole, if you have a LOSS you deduct it from your profits. I dont know anyone who would not deduct investment losses, even Harry Reid, Pelosi and Obama would deduct a loss on their taxes. You people are idiots.
All that matters now is showing there is some sort of 'grain of truthiness' in Reid's comment. - Even if it requires making the point that "RMoney" had some years where he didn't earn millions. Of course, this argument undermines their argument that "Romney rakes in tons of profit on the backs of the common man", but that doesn't matter. They will argue both points simultaneously, even though they contradict each other.
Either the Romney's are wealthy, and paid nearly 40% of their income to taxes and donations since 1990 - or the Romney's have lost a bucketload of money, yet still paid an average of 40% over 20 years.
Anyway - 'RMoney' is said to be worth 250 million dollars today. It is also known that Mitt donated all of his dad's fortunes to charity, so all of the money he has, he has earned.
Bain was started in 1984, and I do not know exactly how much money he earned from it between '84 and '90. So, we need to toss some of that 250 million out. The statement from PWC excludes earning after 2009 - So I am going to toss out a generous figure - 50 million, the odds are he earned much less during these years but let's work with it, okay ?
Romney has 200 million dollars in his pocket today, minus any earnings before 1990, and after 2009.
PWC certifies that after 1990, up to 2009, Romney paid out a total of 38.5% of his gross adjusted income in taxes and donations.
This means he must have started off with approximately 325 million dollars, out of which he gave away 125 million. (Get out your calculator apps dummies - enter 325,000,000 minus 38.5 percent )
See, primitives ? It doesn't matter if he had years when he had big capital losses - if he has 200 million left in his pocket after paying taxes between 1990 and 2009, then he must have paid out and given away 125 million. In reality, he probably gave away more, since I did exclude 20 percent of his net worth for the period before 1990 and after 2009. What a terrible person.
