Sherman A1 (9,352 posts)
80. Agreed
And that the story is from the NYT it will be immediately discredited by the Republicans and those who will vote that way in November. Assuming the reporting and story is 110% accurate, it will make absolutely no difference to them.
Okay, shermy, I'll play your silly ass game and assume the story is 110% accurate. From what I read, the NYT is looking to dredge up bullshit on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 to splatter it against the GOP. Why do I say that? Very simply because the CIA was warning of the threat of an impending attack.
Somewhere,
somehow, bin laden and the gang was going to attack us.
Let me break that down for you, DUmbass, to the two most important words:
Somewhere,
somehow. What the author has failed to mention is the fact that the CIA had nothing better than
somewhere and
somehow. There was no definite intel on what was going to happen, where it was going to happen, and what method of delivery was being used - just
somewhere,
somehow. No leader is going to throw the entire country into chaos and lockdown over
somewhere and
somehow.
None; not even your precious algore.
What this walking cluster**** of journalism malpractice has that no one at the time did is history and hindsight. Funny how those two things will give even the most retarded among us the ability to connect a ton of dots that connect the
somewhere,
somehow. The kangaroo court of the 9/11 commission didn't find the first damn thing and neither has this ****ing idiot. So, calm yourself down and save your blood pressure for election night.
Yer gonna need it...