Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Spaldeen (42 posts) Newsweek Cover-- WTF? So I come home from walking to dog to find that the 'ordained' would-be senator for the state north of me has opened his trap about rape- what an idiot. Good. But just now I'm cruising The Daily Beast, and I come across what is supposed to be the newest cover of Newsweek: http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/08/19/niall-ferguson-on-why-barack-obama-needs-to-go.html
The Velveteen Ocelot (31,963 posts) 1. No, it's just that neocon douche Niall Ferguson.He's a joke anyhow, and so is Newsweek, which hardly anybody reads anymore. They might be desperate for controversy.
Dkc05 (110 posts) 13. can the DOJ ban the cover.Stop the circulation as its not honest
The Velveteen Ocelot (31,964 posts) 16. No, and they should not try.Last edited Sun Aug 19, 2012, 10:12 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)There's that inconvenient First Amendment thingy. Newsweek can publish what it wants, even if it's bullshit, and the government can't and shouldn't shut them down. That sword cuts two ways. I am always astonished and appalled when I read on a liberal website a call for suppression of the press by the government.
I know where owebuma can go...[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGYpTb7SPlI[/youtube](Jack is pronounced Barack)
soon as you find your manhood all else falls into place.
If Ft. Hood was "workplace violence," then the Hindenburg was an air show.
I don't know if sand glows in the dark, but we're gonna find out.
Dkc05 (110 posts)13. can the DOJ ban the cover.Stop the circulation as its not honest
Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #16)Sun Aug 19, 2012, 10:22 PMDkc05 (111 posts) 17. i dont see the issue they published trashBan them or fine them
Response to jberryhill (Reply #33)Sun Aug 19, 2012, 11:45 PMSpaldeen (48 posts) 38. Well,I can't think of any off the top of my head, but wouldn't the Fairness Doctrine be something that might apply in this case?
Response to Dkc05 (Reply #13)Sun Aug 19, 2012, 10:57 PM2ndAmForComputers (1,964 posts) 22. Nice try.But the caricature of the Freedom Hating Liberal must be done with a bit more subtlety.
What is it with this guy? Every post he makes reeks of totalitarian dictatorship.
Why does every pic of Barry show him with his mouth open?
You'll never read it anywhere else.
Exactly like the CalPig.
Spaldeen (48 posts)44. Yeah, I knew the FD was no longer with usI meant it as more of a 'what if' type of answer, since I couldn't answer your question about print media being banned.I do know there have been rumblings on DU in the past of working the FD back in (plausible, or not), and using it against our tubby friend that dominates the AM airways, so I tossed it out there in sort of a 'what if' moment.
jberryhill (24,665 posts)46. I doubt you will find much support on DU...for the idea of banning or fining magazines on the basis of editorial content.
Tunkamerica (4,052 posts)55. I think you're mistaken or you were reading a post from one of the many temporary trollsthat pop in