DUmmy doesn't agree with alerts in the meta (that we cannot see).

[BEG]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1240135311

jorno67 (1,538 posts)
When you agree with a Jury Decision...can that be good enough? Do you have start a Meta Thread
to slam the one or two Jurors that didn't agree with you?
I see that on here all the time...What's the point? 

Not an exciting campfire.  The interest is mainly that some of the DUmmies express discontent in the hidden forum that many of them refuse to believe others can read at their leisure.

Some DUmmies agree with DUjornonumbers, others do not.  A good number of the threads in the 'forum that cannot be seen (sorta)' are complaints about juries.  "They didn't like my alert! I'm upset!" and/or "They hid my response! I'm upset!"

quinnox (12,571 posts)
1. what? not when someone DARES to disagree with my opinion! *sputter* The nerve! I want to call them every name in the book for this sort of outrage!
{the above is heavy sarcasm/parody, as if it needs to be said}
Yea, seriously, it is pretty ridiculous.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ikonoklast (18,585 posts)
2. Have you read some of the dissents?
There are some real irrational reasons put forth by some jurors to let a post stand.
I see now why innocent people get sent to jail, and some murderers go free with jurors like that.We Are  Watching You
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 hobbit709 (23,018 posts)
3. I've also read some of the alerts.
I wouldn't shut up when threatened with Ft. Leavenworth. I won't shut up now.
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Ikonoklast (18,585 posts)
4. I think some of those are written by the same people.
We Are  Watching You
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Kali (29,134 posts)
5. alert monkeys
I think there are monkey writing some of the alerts.   <<===steal and use this image if you want Grovelbot reinstated!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 stevenleser (10,130 posts)
6. Depends on what/why. I agree with shedding light on votes to allow a bigoted post to stand.
DU3 is still not even a year old. I think that this helps air out clear disagreements by some in the community in terms of what is acceptable behavior.
For better or worse, DU became a 99% community policed site with DU3 and as a result, the community needs to communicate a lot to determine how to best police itself.

[franksolich]

Good one, BEG.

I encourage others to post from the hidden meta forum as much as they can; I don't post my own, because the elusive enigmatic Elad is hot on the trail of my main mole, and I don't want to excite suspicion.

HOWEVER, if someone else is worried for the safety of his own mole, just copy-and-paste the whole entire thing onto a personal message, and send it my way, after which I'll post it here.

Don't even bother to "format;" I can do that myself, easy as strawberries-and-cream.

[obumazombie]

Once again proving, libs will never be satisfied, and always be voracious.