« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Infanticide advocates lose out in KS, bitch you wouldn't **** hurt most  (Read 1344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23556
  • Reputation: +2479/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Infanticide advocates lose out in KS, bitch you wouldn't **** hurt most
« on: June 22, 2012, 05:25:10 PM »
Quote
proud2BlibKansan (92,093 posts)
 
Kansas revokes Ann Kristin Neuhaus' medical license over abortion referrals
Source: Pitch Weekly

The latest salvo in the debate over abortion in Kansas is a loud one. Earlier this morning, the Associated Press reported that the Kansas Board of Healing Arts decided to strip Dr. Ann Kristin Neuhaus of her medical license.

Neuhaus, profiled by The Pitch's Justin Kendall back in November, is a Nortonville doctor who provided second opinion mental health exams on patients seeking late-term abortions from the late Dr. George Tiller. Those consultations, between 1999 and 2006, were required under Kansas law, which has since been changed to remove the mental health exception for late term abortions.

Kansas regulators agreed with an administrative judge that Neuhaus had failed to sufficiently examine 11 patients, who were seeking abortions after 22 weeks, in 2003.

Read more: http://www.pitch.com/plog/archives/2012/06/22/kansas-revokes-ann-kristin-neuhaus-medical-license-over-abortion-referrals

Quote
LiberalLoner (3,852 posts)
2. Glad I'm not living in Kansas. I fear for the women who are living there.

Yeah, ut at least the children are safer now.

Quote
EFerrari (163,504 posts)
8. This isn't just about KS. They're trying to create a precedent. n/t

LOL

yes

Quote
xxqqqzme (12,307 posts)
4. And the witch hunt rolls

on across the great plains.

Wish I still had my curse inflicting powers.

Usually "witch hunt" infers pursuit of non-existent threats.

I assure the children are quite real.

Quote
RitchieRich (120 posts)
5. Were they medically necessary?

...not that it should really matter, but one is less justifiable. It would certainly frame the argument one way or the other.

uh oh

Quote
proud2BlibKansan (92,093 posts)
7. Some were, yes

Most of the cases the board looked at involved very young girls. The youngest was 9. And if you think giving birth is a safe medical procedure for a 9 year old, then we don't have anything more to talk about.

"Some"

As in the rest weren't.

I'd like to know what pregnancy-induced medical condition can threaten a woman's health after 22 weeks that can only be mitigated by abortion.

Quote
MightyOkie (52 posts)
26. Thanks Doctor

Enjoy your stay.

Quote
mbperrin (5,988 posts)
9. The law in Kansas required the doctor to ascertain that the woman

was not mentally disturbed, essentially.

Medically necessary means?

Quote
Warren Stupidity (27,118 posts)
20. It really is none of your business

Nor the business of the state of Kansas what the mental health of these women was.

However, late term abortions are all medically necessary in Kansas. But go right ahead and defend rw fundies who would deny a 10 year old child an abortion.

P S if you don't want replies to your defense of the indefensible, don't post.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014149854
Logged
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Bad Dog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
  • Reputation: +314/-313
  • God help me I do love it so
Re: Infanticide advocates lose out in KS, bitch you wouldn't **** hurt most
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2012, 06:23:20 PM »
Rush rightly calls it their sacrament.
Logged

Offline Porfiry

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 50
  • Reputation: +10/-10
  • Never ever, never ever give up
Re: Infanticide advocates lose out in KS, bitch you wouldn't **** hurt most
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2012, 08:21:04 PM »
Giving birth would be bad for a ten year old, but having an abortion would not?

Both would be horrific.

The main question here is:

WHY IS THAT CHILD PREGNANT????
Logged
We are holding the fort in San Francisco.  Send reinforcements.

Offline Bad Dog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
  • Reputation: +314/-313
  • God help me I do love it so
Re: Infanticide advocates lose out in KS, bitch you wouldn't **** hurt most
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2012, 11:24:47 PM »
Quote from: Porfiry on June 22, 2012, 08:21:04 PM
Giving birth would be bad for a ten year old, but having an abortion would not?

Both would be horrific.

The main question here is:

WHY IS THAT CHILD PREGNANT????

Well, if she goes to Planned Parenthood we'll never know.
Logged

Offline Skul

  • Sometimes I drink water just to surprise my liver
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12475
  • Reputation: +914/-179
  • Chief of the cathouse
Re: Infanticide advocates lose out in KS, bitch you wouldn't **** hurt most
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2012, 11:49:27 PM »
Quote
LiberalLoner (3,852 posts)
2. Glad I'm not living in Kansas. I fear for the women who are living there.
Children, not so much.  :banghead:

Logged
Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

Offline MrsSmith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5977
  • Reputation: +466/-54
Re: Infanticide advocates lose out in KS, bitch you wouldn't **** hurt most
« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2012, 03:00:48 AM »
Quote from: Porfiry on June 22, 2012, 08:21:04 PM
Giving birth would be bad for a ten year old, but having an abortion would not?

Both would be horrific.

The main question here is:

WHY IS THAT CHILD PREGNANT????
Exactly the point.  None of the "doctors" or medical personnel involved with Tiller's clinic, including Neuhaus, ever reported the likelihood that the children were being molested.  This is still true of Kansas Planned Parenthood, and the reason behind the case that caused the political powers of Kansas to crucify Phil Kline.  No leftist is willing to "reduce the right to sex" just to protect children...born or unborn.   :mad:
Logged
.
.

Antifa - the only fascists in America today.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: Infanticide advocates lose out in KS, bitch you wouldn't **** hurt most
« Reply #6 on: June 23, 2012, 06:21:10 AM »
Quote from: Porfiry on June 22, 2012, 08:21:04 PM
Giving birth would be bad for a ten year old, but having an abortion would not?

Both would be horrific.

The main question here is:

WHY IS THAT CHILD PREGNANT????
If the jug-eared kenyan had a son, he'd look just like the "baby-daddy".
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »