Femanazi Feathers Fly

[Revolution]

Harmony Blue (1,565 posts)

RadFeminists are making it difficult for the Democratic party to fight the GOP's attack on women

 What is increasingly obvious is that the GOP is attacking women's rights in a variety of ways and levels of government. Unfortunately, it appears there is little to slow down their agenda. But, the majority of the registered voters in the United States are female. So, what is happening? Is it social conditioning by a patriarchal society or is there much more?
 
In my opinion it all boils down to the message being put forth. Many have acknowledged the GOP are far better at using slogans or messages that are simple, to the point, and which can resonate with everyday voters. Their language can be shocking, but at the end of the day they simply go back to fundamental basics. Family, life, etc which carries different subtle meanings to each individual but on a greater whole the same understanding.
 
It is quite apparent the majority of female registered voters are buying in to what the GOP is saying. But why? I firmly believe when extreme rhetoric or hyperbole is used that is pretty much turns people off. Shock jocks like Howard Stern and Limbaugh do it for ratings, and there are those that tune in to find out what other outrageous things either will say. But at the end of the day, you can listen only so much to such extreme provocative language. There is a saturation effect where you start to tune out what is being said. Until the RadFems tone down their malicious, misandrist rhetoric, we will lose the majority of female registered voters in the United States, and start to divide the male members of the Democratic party (exactly what the GOP wants as their entire playbook is about division not unity). The GOP is winning, because they clearly understand uniform messaging compared to the Democratic party.
 
The only way to counter this is with calmed reason, logical arguments, and highly scrutinized scientific data. This is why when it comes to how the Obama administration has traversed topics regarding female equality they have done a sterling job. But it is quite apparent they still have much more work to do. I suspect female voters will turn out for Obama, but will it be enough? I don't know, but using extreme rhetoric will turn them off from voting in November.
 
Thank you for your time.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002817409

You guys are toast.

seabeyond (73,437 posts)

52. i have already run into this poster in a game thread earlier today. divisive is women speaking out.

it was all so stupid, this is a poster i dont even try to discuss, let alone reasoned and logical. so far beyond logical.
 
you seeing those mean old radfems all over the place shouting those dems down?

run baby, run, is right.

but, it is an example of what women face. and that is sobering
]

Our favorite Gestapo Gal shows up. What would be sobering is if you could type coherently.

Are you drunk?

sufrommich (11,726 posts)

50. We also have 2 DUers who personally know

Last edited Sat Jun 16, 2012, 08:33 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

women who want to kill all men and keep their testicles in jars. What are the freakin' odds of that?!

WOAH! If Seabeyond isn't one of them, she's still a closeted nut cutter then.

liberal N proud (38,940 posts)

4. Can you back up the women supporting the GOP?

I have not seen any data supporting that. I also have not seen any radical feminist rhetoric from the left.

 

[Tantal]

Mainstream American women are turned off by bitter old bull-dykes? Who knew?

[BEG]

Like I said on twitter (in response to another tweet), why should I support a vagina if I don't agree with the vagina?

[Tantal]

..........why should I support a vagina if I don't agree with the vagina?

I always support vagina....unless, of course, it's unkempt DUmmie vagina.......which, unfortunately, happens to have an actual DUmmie attached to it.

[BEG]

I always support vagina....unless, of course, it's unkempt DUmmie vagina.......which, unfortunately, happens to have an actual DUmmie attached to it.

Some are evil angry vaginas 

[Revolution]

Some are evil angry vaginas 

...with teeth...

[MrsSmith]

It seems pretty obvious...conservative women have a mind AND a vagina.  Liberal women seem proud to have only the vagina.    

[longview]

It seems pretty obvious...conservative women have a mind AND a vagina.  Liberal women seem proud to have only the vagina.    

Bless their hearts.

[JohnnyReb]

Boobs with boobs are boobs.

[Ballygrl]

Like I said on twitter (in response to another tweet), why should I support a vagina if I don't agree with the vagina?

I was wondering what you were talking about!

[BEG]

I was wondering what you were talking about!

LOL you should go back and read the whole back and forth. If you click on the Lib Chick's account you will see where she was trying to claim that we were silencing her.    She kept adding her lib# to replies to try to call other libs to defend her.

Their side really don't like their tactics used on them. They don't know what to do. 

[Wineslob]

Vaginas and boobs, I approve.   

[Bad Dog]

I always support vagina....unless, of course, it's unkempt DUmmie vagina.......which, unfortunately, happens to have an actual DUmmie attached to it.

I have no actual experience but, I have been warned they have teeth on both ends.

[delilahmused]

seabeyond (73,437 posts)

52. i have already run into this poster in a game thread earlier today. divisive is women speaking out.

it was all so stupid, this is a poster i dont even try to discuss, let alone reasoned and logical. so far beyond logical.
 
you seeing those mean old radfems all over the place shouting those dems down?

run baby, run, is right.

but, it is an example of what women face. and that is sobering

This one always cracks me up, especially after a weekend the strongest, most memorable speeches were given by two women: Sarah Palin & Michelle Malkin.

Cindie

[Revolution]

LOL you should go back and read the whole back and forth. If you click on the Lib Chick's account you will see where she was trying to claim that we were silencing her.    She kept adding her lib# to replies to try to call other libs to defend her.

Their side really don't like their tactics used on them. They don't know what to do. 

I didn't know people could use "calls to arms" on Twatter.