http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002810738Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:20 AM
Occulus (19,083 posts)
24-hour poll: Does DU need judges as well as juries?
Last edited Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:23 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
Mods, this is being posted as a poll here in GD because you can't post polls in Meta. Thank you for your understanding.
71 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Time expired
Yes -- 12 (17%)
No -- 59 (83%)
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
Response to Occulus (Original post)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:22 AM
DURHAM D (14,251 posts)
1. Yes -
so crap like this will be removed when the jury fails.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002810596
Link given refers to the "feminine" thread we laughed at.
boppers (16,230 posts)
2. If you don't trust juries, why trust judges?
Why give one person to the power to over-ride 6? Why even have juries?
They keep our moles occupied, that's why.
Response to EFerrari (Reply #13)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:57 AM
Occulus (19,083 posts)
14. Three trolls sat on a jury.
What happens next?
The moles vote the other way. See, easy.
Response to Occulus (Reply #14)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 01:21 AM
EFerrari (163,288 posts)
17. How often does that happen?
Seriously, how big a problem is it?
What problem? There's no problem at all. Nothing to see here, move along.
Occulus (19,083 posts)
18. I'm not certain that is an answerable question
That said, I've been seeing numbers greater than one instead of zeroes lately under the names of low-count trolls who have been PPR'd in the "Number of times served on a Jury" spot, and that bothers me.
Only trolls disrupt, moles try to blend in.
Response to agent46 (Reply #10)
Fri Jun 15, 2012, 12:49 AM
Occulus (19,083 posts)
12. We already have those.
And MIRT really does do a fantastic job.
Yup, they sure do. Yup.
