Author Topic: Supply side Bush vs--Keynesian Obama  (Read 1213 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bluecoller-eddie

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 7
  • Reputation: +0/-48
Supply side Bush vs--Keynesian Obama
« on: June 02, 2012, 05:48:59 PM »


Supply side Bush vs--Keynesian Obama

Two recessions during the Bush years started about the same time,
one in Jan. of 2001 and the second in Feb. of 2008.

Lets compare the two recovery's by job creation During the recoverys!


Quote
January 20, 2012
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/20/mitt_romney_of_course_the_economy_is_getting_better.html
 Romney
"The president's policies have made the recession deeper and have made the recovery
more tepid and more difficult on the American people. This is the worst recovery
that we have seen from a recession since Hoover.


 Romney claims that he can read a  balance sheet?
How often does 500,000 jobs come up on the federal Gov. balance sheet?

Quote
“We should be seeing numbers in the 500,000 jobs created per month,”
Romney said during an interview on Fox News. “This is way, way, way off from
what should happen in a normal recovery.”

The first 40 months of the two recessions are in these graphs.

http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?ce
Total Private Employment - CES0500000001

http://tiptank.freeservers.com/images/job_losses_or_gaines_1.jpghttp://tiptank.freeservers.com/images/job_losses_or_gaines_1.jpg

http://tiptank.freeservers.com/images/job_losses_or_gaines_2.jpghttp://tiptank.freeservers.com/images/job_losses_or_gaines_2.jpg

                   
2001...............2008   
Private    ..........Private   
sector-----------sector
                   
1.....-46.....1.....41
2......-8.....2...-136
3.....-67.....3...-112
4....-329.....4...-215
5.....-81.....5...-216
6....-236.....6...-231
7....-173.....7...-259
8....-188.....8...-294
9....-267.....9...-425
10...-364....10...-480
11...-346....11...-797
12...-207....12...-658
13...-151....13...-839
14...-159....14...-725
15....-65....15...-787
16....-96....16...-802
17....-80....17...-312
18.....12....18...-426
19....-95....19...-296
20....-56....20...-219
21....-12....21...-184
22...-108....22...-232
23....-14....23....-42
24...-170....24...-120
25.....57....25....-40
26...-157....26....-27
27...-199....27....141
28....-34....28....193
29.....19....29.....84
30....-39....30.....92
31.....-2....31.....92
32.....32....32....128
33....161....33....115
34....143....34....196
35.....37....35....134
36....108....36....140
37....170....37....119
38.....32....38....257
39....299....39....261
40....223....40....264

-----1,205 -------2,216

Later months.
 
-----------------------1,205 ------------------------------2,216
May-2004-41 ---310 ---1,515 ------May-2011-41 ---108 ---2,324
Jun-2004--42 ----94 ---1,609 ------Jun-2011--42 ---102 ---2,426
Jul-2004---43 ----41 ---1,650 ------Jul-2011--43 ---175 ---2,601
Aug-2004--44 ---102 ---1,752 ------Aug-2011-44 ----52 ---2,653
Sep-2004--45 ---152 ---1,904 ------Sep-2011-45 ---216 ---2,869
Oct-2004--46 ---327 ---2,231 ------Oct-2011-46 ---139 ---3,008
Nov-2004--47 ----27 ---2,258 ------Nov-2011-47 ---178 ---3,186
Dec-2004--48 ---133 ---2,391 ------Dec-2011-48 ---234 ---3,420
Jan-2005--49 -----95 ---2,486 ------Jan-2012-49 ---277 ---3,697
Feb-2005--50 ---231 ---2,717 ------Feb-2012--50 ---254 ---3,951
Mar-2005--51 ---145 ---2,862 ------Mar-2012--51 ---147 ---4,098
Apr-2005--52 ---346 ---3,208 ------Apr-2012--52 -----87 ---4,185
May-2005-53 ---143 ---3,351 ------May-2012--53 ----82 ----4,267


53 months after the job losses started Keynesian economics was
916 thousand jobs ahead of supply side economics.


From Jan 2001 to Jan 2009, the economy lost 646,000 private sector jobs.
This is a failed policy. Supply side failed. Period.

Jan --2001 ---------111,631
Jan --2009 ---------110 985 ---------Minus 646,000 ---Minus 0.06%

From Jan 2001 to Feb 2010, the full length of the supply-side experiment
the economy LOST almost five million jobs.
This is a failed policy. Supply side failed. Period.

Jan --2001 --------111,631
Feb --2010 --------106,773 ----Minus-------4,858,000 ---Minus  4.4%

In the 24 months of job losses during the Bush recession the economy lost
almost nine million private sector jobs.
This is a failed policy. Supply side failed. Period.

Jan 2008 --115,647
Feb 2010 --106,773 --minus 8,874,000 private sector jobs.
This is a failed policy. Supply side failed. Period.

From Jan 2001 to Feb 2010, the full length of the supply-side experiment
the Manufacturing sector lost five million 650 thousand jobs.

Jan --2001 ---17,112
Feb --2010 ---11,462 ---Minus 5,650
This is a failed policy. Supply side failed. Period.

The Bush supply side recession lost 8,874,000 private sector jobs then they
say Obama is not getting them back quick enough.




-----Bluecoller, the grumpy old kraut-----  :mad:

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: Supply side Bush vs--Keynesian Obama
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2012, 05:54:35 PM »
Are you having your period...period?
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +802/-833
Re: Supply side Bush vs--Keynesian Obama
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2012, 06:08:23 PM »
   

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6238
  • Reputation: +429/-44
Re: Supply side Bush vs--Keynesian Obama
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2012, 06:08:49 PM »
And speaking of things that fail we can add your links.  But here you go:




 :rotf:
< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline Kyle Ricky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7596
  • Reputation: +614/-1086
Re: Supply side Bush vs--Keynesian Obama
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2012, 06:26:20 PM »
They was Obama was talking, he was going to recover the economy, make everyone in the country rich, and walk on water by the end of the first year of his term. That is what you get when you elect someone who never did anything besides community organizer.

When will the liberals learn that Obama is nothing but a failure. He is the second coming of Jimmy Carter. I am hoping Romney turns out to be the second coming of Reagan. That would really burn all the liberals.

Edit: I forgot to add that out of those 2 million jobs that Obama supposedly created (He still has a 1 million negative employment mark), 1,999,000 were government jobs.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2012, 06:30:50 PM by Kyle Ricky »