I have some questions for you to post on a board that welcomes questions about Objectivism. Feel free to post your own revised version of these questions. If you wish to, then of course I cannot prevent you from linking back here to explain what motivated you to post the questions. However, I don't provide my moral sanction. I am hoping that it's possible to get answers to the questions themselves, regardless of how people might feel about things that I have written in the past.
Questions:
1. Is Goldbach's conjecture "arbitrary" in the same sense that the assertion "God exists" is said to be "arbitrary"?
2. Is it possible for there to be evidence supporting the claim that Goldbach's conjecture is true? Alternatively, do the following four cases exhaust all possibilities?
A. Goldbach's conjecture is known to be true,
B. Goldbach's conjecture is known to be false,
C. There is no evidence supporting the claim that Goldbach's conjecture is true, and no evidence supporting the conjecture that Goldbach's conjecture is false
D. There is evidence supporting the conjecture that Goldbach's conjecture is false
If you aren’t interested in how (other) Objectivists or students of Objectivism might answer the above questions, then please nevertheless check back later. I intend to post additional questions (on other topics, but for Objectivists) in this thread.