Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In a ruling which demonstrated just how radical is the Obama Administration’s opposition to Voter ID laws, the very liberal U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld Arizona’s voter-approved 2004 law requiring voters to show proof of citizenship before receiving a ballot – a big victory in the battle against voter fraud in the runup to the November elections.The Appeals Court mostly shot down the challenges to the law, which had itself been upheld in Arizona U.S. District Court. Arizona can demand to see certain forms of identification that proves citizenship, the court ruled. And if someone doesn’t have those forms of ID, paying the fees to obtain the ID isn’t the same as a “poll tax.â€
I am shocked also, but it is great news.
Will it stop here or will obozo take it to the Supremes?
However, the court also ruled that Arizona must not refuse federal voter registration forms, which work on the honor system by asking applicants to check a box indicating whether they’re U.S. citizens.
Excellent job Mackelrose.
Holder fails again. He couldn't deliver with Fast and Furious, he can't deliver here.
Come November, Holder will not be there anymore.
Not totally surprised... blind squirrel, nut, you know the drill. And USSC precedent is that requiring ID to vote is not an "unreasonable burden".
This morning I went to the post office to pick up a package after the carrier left a pink form on my front door. I had to produce ID before they would release the package, yet I can vote under any name without any id. What's wrong here?