DUmmy snoopernumber is slyly giving new life to a nutcase nadin embarrassment:
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 10:35 AM
snooper2 (12,107 posts)
Did we ever find a picture of the 3-4 feet of hail in Mexico City?
I went looking for that thread and can't find it...
Wanted to show my wife
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002419325Response to snooper2 (Original post)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 10:50 AM
nadinbrzezinski (102,247 posts)
2. Don't worry, next time will stick to not posting what CNN does not pick up
And if I do, will keep it in metric...you can do your conversion.
But Rhandhi rhodes is correct, if it's not on your tv, it never happened.
That's "Rhandhi", as in "Gandhi".
The only difference is Gandhi, as far as we know, never did a drunken faceplant on a New York sidewalk.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #2)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 11:19 AM
seaglass (4,069 posts)
5. If it was 3-4 ft of hail wouldn't a local newspaper or tv station have reported it?
This would be an amazing event I would think.
Response to seaglass (Reply #5)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 11:27 AM
nadinbrzezinski (102,247 posts)
7. It was on teleformula
The block or so with that..they showed it, reported it at a meter...they also said polanco and palmas got concentrations of half a meter...and the rest in centimeters.
But since CNN did not pick on it, it never happened.
Oh and for some strange reason teleformula, which I quoted, does not do YouTube uploads that I coud find
Suffice I to say, after this I will post in metric when applicable, if. Even chose to post it. If it's not on your tv, it did no happen...never mind I was ten minutes from the worst affected area, and the taxi driver was forced to take an alterate route since the road to the airport was closed due to yes, ice.
We should do our own conversions, since nadin meters only have sixty centimeters.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #7)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 11:44 AM
seaglass (4,069 posts)
12. Are there no newspapers? Your line about CNN is silly. There are a lot of events
in my state and in my town that happen that are not on CNN - but if it is current info there are going to be newspaper links, TV links, amateur photo links etc.
No matter what CNN thinks, 3-4 ft of hail is A LOT. It makes absolutely no sense that there wouldn't be evidence that this occurred.
Ergo, it did not happen.
Response to seaglass (Reply #12)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 11:46 AM
nadinbrzezinski (102,247 posts)
14. I posted those, but that's ok
I discovered just how right Rhandhi Rhodes is in that.
I went and found something else of interest in climactic change, but won't bother posting it here. It really does not matter. (Well it does, but not fit for here)
It sounds like the DUmp is perilously close to going back to those dark days of crunchy news.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #2)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 11:24 AM
tammywammy (17,297 posts)
6. Since you also posted there are 60cm in a meter
Keeping it metric might not be a good idea either.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #8)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 11:30 AM
tammywammy (17,297 posts)
9. 3 or 4 feet of hail would get local coverage at least.
You'd think there would be at least one picture of such a meteorological sight.
DUmmy tammywammy, who is truly a DUmmy through and through, implies that nutcase nadin is a liar.
Response to Speck Tater (Reply #3)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 11:33 AM
nadinbrzezinski (102,247 posts)
10. Actually that is a blog
But that's ok. I deleted it because if CNN does not pick on a story it never happened, even when it affected tens of thousands, led to twelve injuries, and a market roof collapse, and a major road closure.
Don't worry, it isn't on CNN it never happened.
So won't bother with posting reports from reporters in the field demonstrating depth either.
If CNN did not pick on it, it really never happened.
Oh, no!! Is nadin a collaborator?
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #10)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 11:45 AM
Speck Tater (8,378 posts)
13. I'd be curoius to learn the facts.
Please don't hide facts from us just because,... well, frankly I don't understand what kind of point you're trying to make by hiding information. Do we at DU really need to be protected from reality? And is that your job? Shouldn't we be openly sharing information in an effort to combat the kind of censorship we so dislike at places like Fox and CNN instead of collaborating with them to keep it hidden?