Author Topic: Prep the Balls, Margret!  (Read 2007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online dutch508

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12574
  • Reputation: +1728/-1068
  • Remember
Prep the Balls, Margret!
« on: May 08, 2008, 05:51:44 PM »
Quote
deadmessengers (1000+ posts)       Thu May-08-08 02:48 PM
Original message http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3259992
My right-wing co-worker is at it again...
 Advertisements [?]In the past, I've posted here about the random spewings of a lunatic rightwinger I work with. He sits in his cube, listens to OxyContin Rush, Neal Boortz, and rants until his head is ready to explode over how horrible those on the left are. A few of my past postings can be found here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...


So, today, I hear a conversation coming across the cube wall. And in this conversation, he asserts that the US Civil War (he calls it the War of Northern Aggression) was "not about slavery".  gator?

While I've heard that truly absurd statement before, I just can't believe there are still people that ignorant - especially someone like him, under the age of 35. Not about slavery?

Now, I have a hard rule that I don't talk politics at the office. I stay away from the topic entirely, because differences in political opinions just create divisions in the workplace, something that I strenuously try to avoid. Barkeepers figured this one out a long time ago - no talking politics or religion in a bar, because people with a couple of drinks in them tend towards beating the crap out of each other when those topics come up.

But damn if today it wasn't hard to hold to my rule. It was really freaking hard for me to keep from saying - "If the civil war wasn't about slavery, then why was it specifically protected in the Confederate Constitution?" or "If the Civil War wasn't about slavery, then why do the words "slave" or "slavery" appear THIRTY FIVE times in Georgia's articles of secession?" It's times like this I really have trouble holding my tongue and keeping my professionalism, and to remember that I am there at the office to work, and to earn a living for my family, and not to roll around in the mud wrestling with conservative knuckledraggers like this guy.


this could get interesting...


Quote
Herdin_Cats (1000+ posts)       Thu May-08-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're stronger than me. 
 I probably would have ripped him a new one. I think I may have permanently damaged my relationship with my sister-in-law when I finally got sick of her racist spew and told her just what I thought of all the hateful garbage about Mexicans and American Indians that comes out of her mouth. 


pst...its Native Americans...

Quote
magellan  (1000+ posts)      Thu May-08-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, there was window-dressing on both sides
 There were many in the North who opposed slavery, but as usual with politicians, this just provided good cover for what was, at its core, a war of economics between the North and South. (If it was truly about the plight of slaves, why was the north hip-deep in child slavery at the turn of the century?) The Civil War was driven by the wealthy elite on both sides who had stakes in the outcome, but sold to the guys who actually fought it as something they could care about: the moral soundness of abolition in the North, and the fear of former slaves taking jobs away from whites in the South.

Another Yankee, who now lives in the South.


you are a carpet bagger.

Quote
lpbk2713  (1000+ posts)      Thu May-08-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Does your organization have a HR Dept that's worth a damn?
It could be worthwhile to let them know what the loonie
next door does to create a hostile work environment.


depends if the HR director is southern...

Quote
DangerDave921 (1000+ posts)      Thu May-08-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Oh come on!
 A hostile work environment? Because a co-worker said something he disagreed with? Have we all become such candy-ass pansies to be so offended when a co-worker says something we don't like?

If you disagree with a co-worker, tell him so. You don't need to run to your boss to tell on him.

If you want the term "hostile work environment" to mean anything, you can't abuse it by running to your boss every time you're offended by a comment you disagree with. The guy is talking about history for pete's sake.

SHUT THE **** UP, DAVE!!!!

Quote
Beregond2 (953 posts)      Thu May-08-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. You are right.
 There is no place for that kind of talk at work. Why don't you complain to your boss? If you can, get a number of other employees to complain along with you. He doesn't have to take-on this guy specifically. He can just establish a policy of "no discussion of religion, politics or other controversial subjects will be tolerated at this workplace." It's not like the guy is going to go running to the ACLU!


becuase overreacting is a DU watchword!

BUT- let's look at the other reasons DUmmie has complained:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=797022

Quote
deadmessengers (1000+ posts)       Tue May-01-07 01:57 PM
Original message
One of my co-workers scares me sometimes
 Advertisements [?]I work with a little GOP blowhard. He sits there listening to RW talk radio (Typically Boortz and OxyRush) from one end of the day to the other, and repeats obsessively the talking points he hears. Every once in a while, he'll just get all worked up in a lather over something, usually how Democrats don't support the troops or some tired old thoroughly debunked canard like that.

This morning, he really got worked up into a frenzy with something that Boortz said, although I don't know what. He slapped his desk, and said, pretty loudly, "I swear, we need to just round up all these Democrats and hang every last one of them for treason." Despite the degree of ignorance and general ****wittery that would go into making a statement like that, I'm really starting to think that it's not just hyperbole, and that he believes that Democrats should be purged or something. It's a little frightening, actually. told you it was a good idea, but NO!!!

I try to keep my political views to myself at work - I just don't feel that it's appropriate. Apparently, I do a pretty good job, because this guy assumes that I'm a Repugnican. Sometimes, though, it takes a lot for me to bite my tongue and STFU while he sits there and rants and rants and rants.

How do you all keep from being driven nuts by your right-wing lunatic co-workers? I know most of you have'em...

 


OOooooooooooo....that's pretty rough, there, Nancy. Let's look at the other one...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1063266

Quote
deadmessengers (1000+ posts)       Thu Jun-07-07 03:39 PM
Original message
The latest from my looney-toons rightwing co-worker
 Advertisements [?]A few weeks ago, I posted here about my slightly unbalanced right-wing co-worker.

His latest outburst: "I can't wait for that fat **** Ted Kennedy to keel over. I think when he does croak I'll bring my daughter to see his grave, and explain to her why Daddy's taking a leak on it."

Any comment I might make about this would be entirely superfluous.


 Pretty tame when it is compared to some of the DUmmie comments about republicans over the years...



The torch of moral clarity since 12/18/07

2016 DOTY: 06 Omaha Steve - Is dying for ****'s face! How could you not vote for him, you heartless bastards!?!

Offline dandi

  • Live long, and piss off liberals.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3341
  • Reputation: +553/-28
Re: Prep the Balls, Margret!
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2008, 06:00:31 PM »
A serialized Bouncy Ball story? Now there's a new twist. I want the box set when it comes out.
I don't want...anybody else
When I think about me I touch myself

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16208
  • Reputation: +2100/-170
Re: Prep the Balls, Margret!
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2008, 08:11:41 PM »
Lots of balls. However, Lincoln never fought the war to free the slaves but to maintain the union. Now it is arguable that the south left because of slavery but the north did not fight to end slavery.  The Dumbass might want to read a history book and a time line on the Emancipation Declaration.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: Prep the Balls, Margret!
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2008, 08:32:04 PM »
"I see balls, LOTS of balls" - franksolich
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Prep the Balls, Margret!
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2008, 06:39:18 AM »
Quote
magellan  (1000+ posts)      Thu May-08-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, there was window-dressing on both sides
 There were many in the North who opposed slavery, but as usual with politicians, this just provided good cover for what was, at its core, a war of economics between the North and South. (If it was truly about the plight of slaves, why was the north hip-deep in child slavery at the turn of the century?) The Civil War was driven by the wealthy elite on both sides who had stakes in the outcome, but sold to the guys who actually fought it as something they could care about: the moral soundness of abolition in the North, and the fear of former slaves taking jobs away from whites in the South.

Another Yankee, who now lives in the South.


Without pouring gas on the usual pointlessly stupid debate about the whether the war was about slavery, I have to say this is one of the most poorly-contructed arguments I've ever seen for a proposition; this moron starts off saying 'It was not about slavery, it was about economics' and then goes on to lay out that the economics was an issue of competition between the free market labor in the North vs. chattel slavery in the South as the means of wealth production for the ruling elites, thereby demonstrating (taking everything else as valid for the sake of argument) that it was, indeed, about slavery.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: Prep the Balls, Margret!
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2008, 08:02:04 AM »
Lots of balls. However, Lincoln never fought the war to free the slaves but to maintain the union. Now it is arguable that the south left because of slavery but the north did not fight to end slavery.  The Dumbass might want to read a history book and a time line on the Emancipation Declaration.

Very true.  They call Lincoln "The Great Emancipator," but his Emancipation Proclamation only freed the slaves over which he had no control.  And at the same time in history, it was something like 140 countries who rid themselves of slavery without ever having to go to war over it.

But, you're asking DUmmies to look at history in an objective manner.

.
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
Re: Prep the Balls, Margret!
« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2008, 10:21:49 AM »
^bingo USA!!!

Idjits one and all.
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Prep the Balls, Margret!
« Reply #7 on: May 09, 2008, 10:24:42 AM »
The Democratic Party is (of the two) the ONLY party to have DEMANDED Slavery in their presidential platform (1856) The Republican party was created specifically to END slavery.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.