Author Topic: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts  (Read 3041 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« on: February 18, 2012, 05:34:01 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2477082

Oh my.

My daily trek to the old DU, to see if it's still up.

It's still up, but the reactionary brain-damaged primitive, who can't adapt to change, who can't get with the program, didn't show up there today.

Quote
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-17-12 09:25 AM
Original message

Poll shows Elizabeth Warren trailing Scott Brown by 9 points
   
Originally, she was polling ahead of Brown, the "neck and neck." Now, she is within walking distance of Coakleyville. What the hell happened?

Poll shows Elizabeth Warren trailing Scott Brown by 9 points

The Suffolk {University} poll shows Brown leading Warren 49 percent to 40 percent and offers a little insight as to why.

Brown’s personal numbers are better than Warren’s in the poll, with a majority (52 percent) rating him favorably and 28 percent rating him unfavorably. Warren, despite being less well-known, has the same unfavorable rating, compared to 35 percent favorable.

<snip>

When voters were asked what are the first words that come to mind when they hear Warren’s name, among the top words are “liberal” and ”Harvard” — two words Republicans are using to try to define Warren. Many of the other words that popped up for Warren are neutral or factual rather than overtly positive.

Brown, meanwhile, still appears to have some of the political brand and popularity that have made him a successful Republican in the country’s most Democratic state. Among his top words are “independent,” “fair,” “honest” and ”hard-worker.”


Notice, she gets called "liberal," not "Democratic." He gets called Republican. (That last sentence is not from the OP story, but per a TV report I heard on the poll a few minutes ago.)

For heaven's sake, please, someone, save Massachusetts from the Brown turd. We don't deserve it, honestly.

Quote
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-17-12 10:26 AM
Response to Original message

1. She had so much momentum...sorry to read that the Repugs ads are working..

Quote
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Fri Feb-17-12 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #1

2. Thing is, I live in Boston. And my TV is on a lot, no matter what else I am doing.
   
I heard/saw a flurry of TV ads a while back, both hers and Brown's. But then, they seem to have died down.

I certainly expect to see a lot more during the general, but I have not been seeing many.

Then again, local media gives Brown a lot of help--and has been doing that all along.

They don't even make a pretense of being objective. I've heard things like, "He's certainly been doing everything right."

And the few times he strays from his Party, they make a huge deal about how "independent" he is, which is how he sold himself--right after he first pretended he was Kennedy like. (His first ads featured a clip of JFK--and he never campaigned as a Republican.)

As an aside, when in blazes did "Harvard" become pejorative?

Damn Eisenhower and his "ivory tower" insults.

ILIMA.

(I like Ike, my ass.)

Quote
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Fri Feb-17-12 05:37 PM
Response to Original message

4. a charmer former male model vs an older avg looking intellectual female?
   
what more needs said. so many people are vain and its gonna take education to get the moderate/conservative Dems to support the Dem. agreed, its horrible that any person could ever consider Harvard a bad thing! Yeesh!

Quote
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sat Feb-18-12 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #4

6. You are very kind, DC.
   
But I am not sure that one nude centerfold in the early days of Ms. magazine qualified the Brown turd as a male model.

(Why is it that when one oppressed group begins to grab for equality, it takes on some of the very behavior that oppressed it?)

And I don't think comparing a young Brown with a sixtyish Warren is the way to go, although it did happen a lot after he dissed her lookds.

I think Warren was pretty cute when she was the same age as Brown was in his nude photo.

Today, they both look to me like pleasant-looking people, one of whom is very academically smart and one of whom is very street smart.

Making academia and brains seem like bad things are one of the many ways Republicans have hurt this nation and one of the many things I hold against them.

Quote
Baby Bear Donating Member (104 posts) Fri Feb-17-12 07:08 PM
Response to Original message

5. what happened?
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2012, 05:41:24 PM »
Might have something to do with the fact she was all for the Occutards, lives in a $5 million dollar mansion, makes $350K a year, but is "one of the common people."

Uh, yeah--NO.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +802/-833
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2012, 05:51:31 PM »
That's exactly it  Sparky - she is a millionaire and claims she is not rich. 

 
Quote
This is the best headline of the week:
 
“Multimillionaire Elizabeth Warren: I’m not wealthy.”
 
What makes it even more delectable is that it was posted on a moonbat website, which quickly yanked it down. The truth can be a dangerous thing.


http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/view/20220203moonbat_logic_explains_how_millionaire_isnt_rich/srvc=home&position=1

Even Coakley wasn't that stupid.   

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2012, 05:53:31 PM »
Quote
Making academia and brains seem like bad things are one of the many ways Republicans have hurt this nation and one of the many things I hold against them.

Not sure any of you libtards have either! They tout O'bummer as bein' a constitutional scholar, yet he stomps on it daily!
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!
 

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2012, 05:54:22 PM »
She actually helped her own downfall in one of her own ads.

To make herself more 'common & folksy', she mentions about how she was married at 19, had kids, was dirt poor, finished college as an adult, etc etc. and many individuals realized that Warren makes a lot of stupid decisions.

She torpedoed her own campaign almost as effectively as Coakley- which is why she has been silent. She is hoping that people forget her first poorly thought-out campaign ads.

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +802/-833
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2012, 05:56:46 PM »
She actually helped her own downfall in one of her own ads.

To make herself more 'common & folksy', she mentions about how she was married at 19, had kids, was dirt poor, finished college as an adult, etc etc. and many individuals realized that Warren makes a lot of stupid decisions.
She torpedoed her own campaign almost as effectively as Coakley- which is why she has been silent. She is hoping that people forget her first poorly thought-out campaign ads.


She was a Republican until she was 46 years old.    That alone was enough to make the Cambridge elite hurl. 

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2012, 06:21:50 PM »
DUmmieDivine Discontent says . a charmer former male model vs an older avg looking intellectual female?

Yep, women vote on looks and everyone knows that ughly, bitter, old, liberal, Beotch's are supposed to get the female vote.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2012, 06:27:39 PM »
DUmmieDivine Discontent says . a charmer former male model vs an older avg looking intellectual female?

Yep, women vote on looks and everyone knows that ughly, bitter, old, liberal, Beotch's are supposed to get the female vote.

Oooooooooooohhhhhhh!!!!!!!! Somehow Hilary comes to my minds eye! I could have gone the rest of the year without thinkin' of that skank!
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!
 

Offline sybilll

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1453
  • Reputation: +114/-10
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2012, 09:48:37 PM »
Scott Brown did not run as a Republican?  The hell you say.  He ran as THE deciding vote against ObamaCare.  And that would have happened had Franken not bought his way into his MN seat. 

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2012, 09:10:38 AM »
She was a Republican RINO until she was 46 years old.    That alone was enough to make the Cambridge elite hurl. 

FIFY.  Oven Collins and Snowe, aka "Obama's Comfort Girls" are positively right-wing compared to her.

Oh, and claiming you're "poor" while showing PROFESSIONAL wedding photos?  Yeah, not very effective, Dizzy Lizzy.  (h/t: Howie Carr.)
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6238
  • Reputation: +429/-44
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2012, 03:22:19 PM »
That's exactly it  Sparky - she is a millionaire and claims she is not rich. 

 

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/view/20220203moonbat_logic_explains_how_millionaire_isnt_rich/srvc=home&position=1

Even Coakley wasn't that stupid.   

Howie Carr strikes fear and terror into the hearts and minds of moonbats everywhere. :fuelfire:



< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6238
  • Reputation: +429/-44
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2012, 03:30:03 PM »
FIFY.  Oven Collins and Snowe, aka "Obama's Comfort Girls" are positively right-wing compared to her.

Oh, and claiming you're "poor" while showing PROFESSIONAL wedding photos?  Yeah, not very effective, Dizzy Lizzy.  (h/t: Howie Carr.)

Pul-eeze Mon Ami Clinton Comfort Girls

Willy the Wandering Wanker (who would hit a pile of rocks if he thought a snake had crawled through) would be be both Impeached and Removed from office without them.

< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2012, 03:46:14 PM »
Pul-eeze Mon Ami Clinton Comfort Girls

Willy the Wandering Wanker (who would hit a pile of rocks if he thought a snake had crawled through) would be be both Impeached and Removed from office without them.



Okay, Zeit, what the hell does that mean? I must be missin' sumpin.
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!
 

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6238
  • Reputation: +429/-44
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2012, 04:14:48 PM »
Okay, Zeit, what the hell does that mean? I must be missin' sumpin.

Abridged version:

Not too discriminating.

< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline 67 Rover

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Reputation: +1709/-41
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2012, 04:30:57 PM »
A La Pittstain, Warren's got this BANK IT!
NRA Benefactor member
G.O.A. Life member
G.O.A.L. Life member
Certified Law Enforcement Sig Armorer

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #15 on: February 20, 2012, 11:46:22 AM »
Quote
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sun Feb-19-12 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. Doesn't ode well for Democrats this year. I've been saying that if Romney is the candidate
   
It will be an intensely right-wing election year and Occupy will be marginalized politically by people in both camps (the 53%ers who still believe that keeping their party in office is more important than fundamental change.)

:lmao: Weren't they just telling us that Obama has this election in the bag?
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #16 on: February 20, 2012, 11:49:41 AM »
She must've opened her Hahvahd feminazi Commie yap enough for even the Massholes to start realizing what an arrogant, controlling, self-righteous bitch she is.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #17 on: February 20, 2012, 12:42:11 PM »
She must've opened her Hahvahd feminazi Commie yap enough for even the Massholes to start realizing what an arrogant, controlling, self-righteous bitch she is.

I would think she did that along time ago! How'd ya like to be married to that?
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!
 

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: primitives discuss Senate race in Massachusetts
« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2012, 01:09:56 PM »
This is the ad I mentioned upthread that pretty much killed her chances, unless everyone forgets about it by November.

[youtube=560,315]kE_wj6NHdEQ[/youtube]