I must have looked at half a dozen copies of the same news article at different sites. The UPI is the only one with the extra content.
How does something like this become news with only half the story getting reported? Who contacted the news in the first place? Firing a teacher is not a newsworthy event.
I did read a site yesterday, possibly the CNN version but I'm not sure, that had some further 'Rest of the story' where the sub said he had never been counseled for any of that and it appeared to him to be a completely
ex post facto justification for a decision that seems completely bizarre on its face. From defending many labor cases in courts, it would not surprise me at all that a goofball administrator would say "Wizardry" but the HR people would know better than to put anything that stupid in writing.