Author Topic: nadin explains evolution  (Read 1979 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
nadin explains evolution
« on: December 01, 2011, 03:36:39 AM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2408451

Oh my.

Ho-hum.

Quote
nadinbrzezinski  (1000+ posts)        Thu Dec-01-11 12:23 AM
Original message
 
So how is OWS evolving?

I know this will not be received well... by some, but it is.

I will use my local occupations. While Occupy San Diego is still somewhat married to 24\7 occupation, no matter what the city does... at this point it is partially a matter of principle since the city is enforcing city code in all but an equal way... Occupy Mission Bay meets once a week, for a few hours, to discuss strategy and tactics. In fact MOST occupations have not been permanent affairs. This city has more than a few occupations.

And this is how it is evolving.

It ist the MOST obvious example. But the General Assembly and Consensus are STILL organic to it.

Quote
WHEN CRABS ROAR  (1000+ posts)      Thu Dec-01-11 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
 
1. It should be obvious that neither party wants meaningful change, but that's exactly whats needed, it's needed around the world.

We are rapidly coming to a tipping point, if not already there.

In this country we need a new party at the very least, to bring about the changes that have to occur.
Neither party will allow those changes to happen voluntarily.

So, do we really have the numbers of well educated people that are ready and willing to carry out extreme change?

Quote
OccupySamizdat (18 posts)      Thu Dec-01-11 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
 
2. Evolving

I think the actual "Occupations" have to be just the first step. Someone said recently that Occupy is the first shot fired in the information wars.

I don't think that's entirely true, because PR has been lobbing bombshells at us for half a century, but it's definitely the first retaliation. I'm interested in this as well -- how is organization developing?

Quote
nadinbrzezinski  (1000+ posts)        Thu Dec-01-11 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
 
3. Interesting user name

Given that quite a bit of zamisdat is produced these days.

Welcome to du.

And yes it is evolving. I intend to keep my eye and it is not just evolving, but growing.

nadin must be drunk; she misspelled a Russian word that usually only non-Russians misspell.

Quote
burrowowl  (1000+ posts)        Thu Dec-01-11 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
 
4. Evolving

Yes and hopefully towards meaningful ACTION!

Ho-hum.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2011, 03:57:42 AM »
Evolution: ....hmmmm....Conservatives climbed down from the trees. Liberals were dropped from the trees on their heads by their mothers.....several times.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19839
  • Reputation: +1618/-100
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2011, 05:32:26 AM »
It evolved the only way a leftist "movement" will.

From a bunch of crybaby,bratty (trust fund kids looking for a party) group that was annoying but basically harmless to a violent group of anarchists,drug addicts and dealers,sexual perverts and predators and vagrants looking for a handout.

One would think nadin would have known those trends from a long time ago.
They crossed the Rubicon long ago and when the dust settles...well it is a hell of a mess to clean up.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2011, 07:22:10 AM »
It evolved the only way a leftist "movement" will.

From a bunch of crybaby,bratty (trust fund kids looking for a party) group that was annoying but basically harmless to a violent group of anarchists,drug addicts and dealers,sexual perverts and predators and vagrants looking for a handout.

One would think nadin would have known those trends from a long time ago.
They crossed the Rubicon long ago and when the dust settles...well it is a hell of a mess to clean up.

Carl, it's obvious that the script changed on her.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10937
  • Reputation: +540/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2011, 07:24:32 AM »
Quote
nadinbrzezinski  (1000+ posts)        Thu Dec-01-11 12:23 AM
Original message
 
... Occupy Mission Bay meets once a week, for a few hours, to discuss strategy and tactics.

And who appointed these commissars to be leaders of anything?

Another thing. What's up with her three ...? I don't see a need for a pause.
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19839
  • Reputation: +1618/-100
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2011, 07:32:59 AM »
Carl, it's obvious that the script changed on her.

On a meta level too

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2011, 10:25:36 AM »
On a meta level too
I've noticed that after a couple of  weeks when "meta" showed up in nearly every nutcase post, now we've gone over a week without a single
instance.

It's reminiscent of her infamous "parenteral" debacle. She used that word dozens of times a day during the "Fiuki" crisis, until it was revealed that she didn't know what it meant. That led to her permanent (5 days) exile to Crazy Andrea's place.

I'm just trying to connect the dots here.

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10937
  • Reputation: +540/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2011, 10:34:58 AM »
Here you have a DUmmy explaining a process that they haven't experienced themselves.
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline Skul

  • Sometimes I drink water just to surprise my liver
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12475
  • Reputation: +914/-179
  • Chief of the cathouse
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2011, 10:36:16 AM »
Nads seems to forget.
During evolution, 99% wither, die and become extinct because what they evolved into, was worthless.
The OWSies have evloved into a grasshopper with only one hind legs.
Stupid Nads.



Here you have a DUmmy explaining a process that they haven't experienced themselves.
I saw what you did. :rotf: :cheersmate:
Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19839
  • Reputation: +1618/-100
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2011, 11:01:50 AM »
I've noticed that after a couple of  weeks when "meta" showed up in nearly every nutcase post, now we've gone over a week without a single
instance.

It's reminiscent of her infamous "parenteral" debacle. She used that word dozens of times a day during the "Fiuki" crisis, until it was revealed that she didn't know what it meant. That led to her permanent (5 days) exile to Crazy Andrea's place.

I'm just trying to connect the dots here.

From a couple days ago...


Quote
nadinbrzezinski  (1000+ posts)          Mon Nov-28-11 01:13 AM
 Response to Original message
8. I will like to adrress this not from her Post
   but at a more meta level.

Given US History, if OWS was a group of 500K knitters producing scarfs for starving and needy children, with cookies and milk to boot... it would still be infiltrated.

This is just the way it is.

Are these orders given by the WH? Nope... are they given by the Secretary of Homeland Security? Nope... they are triggered at a much lower level, and well bellow that pay grade.

This is why the FBI infiltrated the Grandmas for Peace during the Bush years, and this is why they infiltrate Right Wing militias regularly.

During the 1960s people who spoke of federal infiltration of the peace movement or SDS were treated like conspiracy loons... and your crazy uncle. That is until we had hearings, which revealed the extent of the efforts, in things like Contrielpro.

Is it crazy to speculate that there is coordination in the post 911 era? No. Does she have the goods? No... but I will offer this to you... well after the dust settles don't be too shocked if she got close to the truth. Even if not precisely in the way she wrote it.

Was this ordered by Chairman King? No... though he might have whispered favors to friends... was this ordered by the Secretary? Not even by the under secretary of signing papers at DHS... it was that much lower.

Some facts, we know.

DHS is a huge federal bureaucracy

DHS is concerned with all threats to the homeland, INCLUDING civil disobedience and disturbances, and riots, Let me see where OWS enters into that scheme...

DHS has been coordinating ANTI TERROR units from multiple municipal police departments... and also coordinating training and protocols. Could they be coordinating this? Well that call of mayors is tantalizing, so is PERF... and anyway, if you all are trained the same way with same protocols same tactics will emerge in the field... that is your lowest level and that is happening.

If there was any coordination it comes at a much lower level than the President or even the Secretary.

To ignore this just because she probably got some of this wrong... is crazy... (and she got a few things wrong) But a meta level it is happening and you will learn of this when the inevitable hearings are carried out well after the dust settles, the same way Contrielpro was revealed by the Church Committee and later in the '76 hearings. I am sure many people who figured them dirty hippies were just paranoid learned a lesson but never apologized.

As I said, if this was 500L knitters it would be suspect and would trigger the same mechanisms... they are set with triggers and it is part of what they are supposed to do... it is part of their mandate, the dark side of it.
   

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2390716

Quote
cherokeeprogressive  (1000+ posts)          Mon Nov-28-11 01:24 AM
 Response to Reply #8
12. WTH is a "meta" level? Is it like the loge, or would it be more like the reserved section?
   Maybe I'm going in the wrong direction altogether, and it's actually where the field level boxes are located?

How does one get to the "meta" level? Stairway? Escalator? Elevator? Levitation?

Quote
nadinbrzezinski  (1000+ posts)          Mon Nov-28-11 01:29 AM
 Response to Reply #12
13. You should use a dictionary
   but here you go

Meta- (from Greek: μετά = "after", "beyond", "with", "adjacent", "self"), is a prefix used in English (and other Greek-owing languages) to indicate a concept which is an abstraction from another concept, used to complete or add to the latter.

And I guess I have found my designated fan.



Or it is a hell of a coincidence.

It is a term used in advanced writing.

Quote
cherokeeprogressive  (1000+ posts)          Mon Nov-28-11 01:52 AM
 Response to Reply #13
14. Your words: "not from her Post but at a more meta level" disagrees with the definition you posted.
   How could you post a response "not from her Post" and consider it to be an abstraction of her post? How could your post "add" to something you stated you weren't responding to?

If I'm to be considered a "designated fan", put me in the upper-level reserved seating, or out in the bleachers. The cheap seats as it were.

I've known people like you personally. When someone in a group says "I", then describes an experience, they respond with "Yes but I" and add to/embellish their response so as to seem more familiar or experienced with what the original speaker had to say. Case in point... Someone posts about gluten, and your brother is a gluten expert whom you've actually discussed the OP's experience with, but in a different context.

For what it's worth, I might be wrong about you. You might really have done it all and seen it all and read about that which you hadn't yet done or seen.

But it sure would be a hell of a coincidence.

I guess I just haven't read enough... because in all the books I've read, be they fiction or non, I've never seen an author use the term as many times as I've seen you use it here.
   

Quote
nadinbrzezinski  (1000+ posts)          Mon Nov-28-11 02:07 AM
 Response to Reply #14
15. Alas most people do not have problems understanding this
   you do.

Have a good day
   


Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2011, 11:05:36 AM »
Wow. I totally missed that. The nutcase post was one of those long ones I usually skip, but it's a great thread.

Quote
It is a term used in advanced writing.
Hilarious! A nutcase nadin classic!
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 11:14:12 AM by GOBUCKS »

Offline Wineslob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14480
  • Reputation: +816/-193
  • Sucking the life out of Liberty
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2011, 11:07:34 AM »
Damn she's a scrunt.

OWS has evolved into the typical rabble that protests always do.


Here, Nads:


« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 11:10:26 AM by Wineslob »
“The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced, if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.”

        -- Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 BC (106-43 BC)

The unobtainable is unknown at Zombo.com



"Practice random violence and senseless acts of brutality"

If you want a gender neutral bathroom, go pee in the forest.

Offline Tess Anderson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4197
  • Reputation: +2886/-31
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2011, 12:33:44 PM »
Now this blowhard is off blaming the "neo-liberals":

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2410957

Nadintracking - now she's working on some "draft". ::)

Quote
nadinbrzezinski  (1000+ posts)          Mon Nov-28-11 01:29 AM
 Response to Reply #12
13. You should use a dictionary
   but here you go

Just to hit her in the head with it.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #13 on: December 01, 2011, 12:39:48 PM »
Nadintracking - now she's working on some "draft". ::)

After having read her finished products at the DUmp, it's hard to imagine what a mess her drafts must be,

Offline DefiantSix

  • Captain, IKS Defiant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18674
  • Reputation: +1995/-189
  • "Set Condition One throughout the ship."
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #14 on: December 01, 2011, 12:46:56 PM »
Hmmm.  Evolution. 

That's related to the whole "Survival of the FITTEST" thing, isn't it Nads? 

Well shit; that eliminates DUmbasses and OWieS from contention, right there.  I mean seriously, Nads; Have you spent so much as 5 minutes listening to these whiney ****s??  Sheepskins from some of the most elitist colleges in the world and these ****ers STILL can't land a job that doesn't include asking, "Do you want to Super Size that, sir". 
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker

"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers

"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus

Offline Bodadh

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 598
  • Reputation: +42/-47
  • Not in the mood!
Re: nadin explains evolution
« Reply #15 on: December 01, 2011, 01:07:20 PM »
Now this blowhard is off blaming the "neo-liberals":

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2410957

Nadintracking - now she's working on some "draft". ::)

Just to hit her in the head with it.

WTH is a neo liberal? I never even really found out what a neo con was and now this gets tossed at me.
A fronte praecipitium a tergo lupi