If she keeps up her campaign for another year, it will be hard to keep her from winning.
If she were ineligible this year, it would make Top DUmmy a pretty hollow award.
Just my opinion, but I dislike anything that resembles "term limits".
She's not ineligible this year, though.
And if she wins, she might as well give up her attention-whoring, because she then can't win again. It's over.
I'm not too fond of this one-time-only thing, excepting that the past two years, there's been comments about too many primitives "repeating" (in the Top 20 as a whole, not Top Primitive), and that they were becoming stale, the same old names year after year.
The no-repeat rule is NOT final; nothing's final until Thanksgiving Eve, when the nominating thread is opened. And so if anyone wants to further discuss, the debate's still wide open. It's just that at this point, it looks likely unless others can give compelling reasons to not have the no-repeat rule.