I've ignored this idiot for awhile because it appears he's not in good stead with the usual gang of idiots. His latest hit piece on Herman Cain, though, must not go without comment because of the incendiary nature of the article.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x636092For weeks I have been worried about the insidious, repulsive wave in this country about the emergence of Herman Cain, whose whacked-out ideas would facilitate the destruction for the vast majority of Americans, as well as an unprecedented wave of hate and violence that would extend to the four corners of this planet. In short, ever since Sarah Palin's acknowledgment that trying to run for president would be a fool's errand, thanks in part to a concerted education effort presented by DU'ers, the field that represents the one-percenters has been extremely fluid.
more...lots more....

DU isn't buying it...
2. You're really going overboard here.
Edited on Wed Nov-02-11 10:34 PM by jaysunb
Neither you or anyone else have information that says this man is a "sex offender."
:evilfrown:
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Nov-02-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. In order for Sexual ABUSE charges to be "resurrected", they have to be made in the first place.
Please point to a charge of SEXUAL ABUSE that has been made by any party against Herman Cain. You and I BOTH know you can't.
This post is hyperbole exemplified. Saved the planet?
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Nov-02-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. The term is 'sexual harassment'
Edited on Wed Nov-02-11 10:53 PM by Tx4obama
NOT sexual abuse.
And being guilty of sexual harassment at a work place etc does not mean someone is a 'sex offender'.
As far as we know so far there was NO physical contact - only verbal sexual harassment.
I am not defending Cain's behavior regarding 'sexual harassment',
but I think that the correct term should be used
and terms that have nothing to do with the current issue at hand should not be used.
Oops... don't piss off Ban...
BanTheGOP Donating Member (570 posts) Thu Nov-03-11 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. If you are a victim, being "harassed" IS being ABUSED! Updated at 10:18 PM
I will answer those who don't think that harassment is as bad as actual abuse. But when someone of Cain's position uses his overwhelming presence to sexually desire your presence, then that crosses the line to abuse. Nobody on the democrat side can even come CLOSE to this type of criminal activity. Clinton was purely consensual, for instance, and cannot be compared to Clarence Thomas or Herman Cain.
I stand by my sex offender charge.
All in all, only 5 people responded and he has more unrecs than recs.
Not really sure how to read this, but it seems even DU can tell who the real kooks are, even if they secretly and fervently wish he were right.