#2. The academics at Mizzou are top-notch. IIRC, they are an AAU institution whereas Nebraska is not. My preference would have been Virginia Tech, FSU, GT, or Clemson to the SEC though.
Uh huh; I have this notion Missouri tops many of the Big 10 in academics, and if "academics" and a large television viewership were relevant to the Big 10, the Big 10 should've snapped up Missouri right away.
Why they chose Nebraska, I have no idea, as Nebraska brings neither one to the Big 10.
Despite that it's only like circa 60-67% "southern," I suspect the Southeastern Conference is going to come to like Missouri, especially that enormous and lucrative television market.
Your other choices for the Southeastern Conference do make better sense than Missouri, excepting for Florida State; I wouldn't class Florida State with such company. The Southeastern Conference is loaded with teams who've played football for decades, for generations, for more than a century; teams who've paid their dues; teams with a history and a heritage.
Florida State needs to play football another forty or fifty years before they deserve to sit at the same table.