You know, I've always been in favor of expanding the House of Representatives a little bit.
Four hundred and thirty-five has been the number since the Wilson administration (1913-1921), and the population's grown quite a bit since then. (Before then, the number of congressmen changed, increased, after every census, since 1790).
And some other tidying up.
The little stuff first; give all non-federal real-estate in Washington, D.C. back to Maryland, making the residents residents of that state. That might, or might not, increase the congressional delegation of the turtle state by one, and it'd be another raving moonbat, but it at the same time would prevent making the District of Columbia susceptible to statehood and two U.S. Senators, inevitably (D)s.
No representatives from territories; states only.
Now, by increasing the number of congressmen from 435 to 450, just fifteen more, would give more equitable representation to small red states. It'd increase, for example, the delegation from Montana from one to two, and from Utah, from four to five. There might be a blue state or two who'd gain an extra congressman, but that gain would be wiped out by all the congressmen red states would get, with an additional fifteen members.
Of course, I'm only dreaming.....