I'm not using the words testimony and evidence in a legal sense and I'm not suggesting that testimony is not evidence. What I'm saying is that testimony is not hard evidence.
To a Godless cretin like yourself...NOTHING will ever be "hard evidence". You lack the imagination or depth of thought to even accept the possibility that there is a force greater than anything you've ever known or can fathom that is in control of everything and is influencing everything you do...good...bad...or otherwise.
You're of the belief that if you can't see it touch it or taste it...it doesn't exist...therefore anyone who DOES believe in that undeen force we call God...are just a bunch of nutty fools.
You try to act all tough and brave and claim logic this and proof that...but it doesn't mask the fact that the thought of your life...your soul...being in control of anyone other than yourself frightens the every loving sh*t out of you.
And if you don't want to believe...fine...that's your life...everyone must live with their decisions.
But why come here like some petchulant child and taunt people who DO believe?
If you are right and we are wrong we have lost nothing. Because there won't be an afterlife in which to complain about what happened.
But if YOU are wrong and the majority of us are right...I feel really sorry for you and the bad choices you've made where faith and belief in God is concerned.
Which definition have I misunderstood?
All of them.