Author Topic: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?  (Read 1498 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6146
  • Reputation: +1745/-29
What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« on: July 16, 2011, 09:28:04 AM »
Quote
simonmagnus (32 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list    Sat Jul-16-11 12:32 AM
Original message
What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
   
resource-based economy:

1.) Food, shelter and clothing is a right.
2.) Natural resources are cataloged and managed by computers intelligently.
3.) Forbidden to steal natural resources and exploit it for profit.
4.) Scientists can focus on solving real problems such as cancer and have full support and freedom to publish findings. No patent system or corporation to restrict them.
5.) A science based methodology to society. (Use what works and discard what doesn't)
6.) Elimination of poverty.
7.) Elimination of war.
8.) Elimination of debt.
9.) Freedom to travel anywhere in the world without money.
10.) Freedom to spend your time however you want.
11.) Technological progress on a level never seen before.


Free World Charter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvDKTRgoSS8


Mole trap.  :fuelfire:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1501071

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2011, 11:33:55 AM »
What economy...nobody will be working...just traveling all over the world and hanging out. :mental:
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2011, 11:44:17 AM »
Quote
Missing Topic

If you have any questions, please contact the site administrator.
Click here to go back to previous page.

WTF? Am I wrong to think that orders came down from the Democrat higher ups to silence the kooks?
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats

Offline tanstaafl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1409
  • Reputation: +110/-22
  • I AM the NRA. And I VOTE

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16232
  • Reputation: +2115/-170
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2011, 03:58:07 PM »
never has worked, never will work.  Dear DUmbass, look up something called the normal distribution or normal distribution.  Then get back to me.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2011, 06:49:22 PM »
Why would they nuke that thread? Everything in it is a DUmmie's wet dream. Everything for free.
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline diesel driver

  • Creepy Ass Cracker and Smart-Ass White Boy!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9130
  • Reputation: +609/-55
  • Enhancing My Carbon Footprint!
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2011, 07:48:00 PM »
Why would they nuke that thread? Everything in it is a DUmmie's wet dream. Everything for free.

Damn, he blowed up REAL GOOD!     :killemall:
Murphy's 3rd Law:  "You can't make anything 'idiot DUmmie proof'.  The world will just create a better idiot DUmmie."

Liberals are like Slinkys.  Basically useless, but they do bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs...
 
Global warming supporters believe that a few hundred million tons of CO2 has more control over our climate than a million mile in diameter, unshielded thermo-nuclear fusion reactor at the middle of the solar system.

"A dead enemy is a peaceful enemy.  Blessed be the peacemakers". - U.S. Marine Corp

You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out of office.

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2011, 07:52:56 PM »
Did anyone watch the video?
I couldn't help, but notice that 0bama's latest talking point about how atm machines cause unemployment was spewed.
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #8 on: July 16, 2011, 08:37:06 PM »
Damn, he blowed up REAL GOOD!   
And I thought I was the only fan of Big Jim McBob and Billy Sol Hurok.

Offline dandi

  • Live long, and piss off liberals.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3341
  • Reputation: +553/-28
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2011, 09:22:51 PM »
Quote
11.) Technological progress on a level never seen before.

Not under Socialism. Nope, no way, never happen. Everyone will move down to same level of mediocrity and we'll just be stuck there.

Oh, there may be a few hardy souls who work and sweat and invent solely for altruistic reasons, but under the forced sameness of Socialism the vast majority of people will do the minimum required to get by and that will be it. It is Capitalism and the promise of financial reward that sparked the innovation that has moved this country so far and so fast into the future and created the standard of living we now enjoy. If Capitalism dies so, for the most part, will progress.

Even your god Marx understood that.

I don't want...anybody else
When I think about me I touch myself

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2011, 09:35:47 PM »
Not under Socialism. Nope, no way, never happen. Everyone will move down to same level of mediocrity and we'll just be stuck there.

Oh, there may be a few hardy souls who work and sweat and invent solely for altruistic reasons, but under the forced sameness of Socialism the vast majority of people will do the minimum required to get by and that will be it. It is Capitalism and the promise of financial reward that sparked the innovation that has moved this country so far and so fast into the future and created the standard of living we now enjoy. If Capitalism dies so, for the most part, will progress.

Even your god Marx understood that.



Also the people who are braking a sweat and working are not going to want to just share the fruits of their labor with everyone and not get anything in return. In fact farmers will more than likely plant and harvest just enough to feed them and their families, instead of working harder to feed a bunch of freeloaders.

I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2011, 11:19:14 PM »
Mole trap.  :fuelfire:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1501071

It certainly is if anyone responds to it intelligently (I know, DU, fat chance on that...).  This was essentially the dream of the Technocrats and Futurists of the 30's which gave us such wonders as the British Labour party of that era and National Health a bit later, and facets of National Socialism like the workers' holidays of the 'Strength through Joy' program in Germany...benefits wrapped in smothering societies that had to totally control their populace to 'Enable them to give out the benefits more efficiently.'  It's the sort of society one sees in the 1936 classic 'The Shape of Things to Come,' with the endstate of a Socialist Utopia ruled by a class of master technicians.

Without the erasure of national boundaries and cultures, it cannot conceivably deliver on #7 since purely rational resource decisions will eventually lead to one country's Technocrats deciding it is more in their interest to engage in war with a rival than not, for causes that might not even seem rational to us.

Nor is there any reason to believe it could possibly deliver on #11.  War (Or preparedness for it) and entrepreneurial impulses have been the clear spurs to the lion's share of technological progress from the Renaissance until now, not central planning with resource allocations for technology R&D being weighed against the effect of possibly diminishing the level of popular benefits for the masses.  I daresay the clearly-foreseeable result of the proposed system would be to induce a technological hiatus that would make the current state of Islamic scientific endeavor (Frozen for some 600 years now) or 19th-Century Imperial China's (Essentially unchanged for well over a millennium before its slumber was disturbed by the Europeans) look astoundingly-advanced by comparison.   
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6146
  • Reputation: +1745/-29
Re: What does DU think about the resource-based economy?
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2011, 11:36:54 PM »
It certainly is if anyone responds to it intelligently (I know, DU, fat chance on that...).  This was essentially the dream of the Technocrats and Futurists of the 30's which gave us such wonders as the British Labour party of that era and National Health a bit later, and facets of National Socialism like the workers' holidays of the 'Strength through Joy' program in Germany...benefits wrapped in smothering societies that had to totally control their populace to 'Enable them to give out the benefits more efficiently.'  It's the sort of society one sees in the 1936 classic 'The Shape of Things to Come,' with the endstate of a Socialist Utopia ruled by a class of master technicians.

Without the erasure of national boundaries and cultures, it cannot conceivably deliver on #7 since purely rational resource decisions will eventually lead to one country's Technocrats deciding it is more in their interest to engage in war with a rival than not, for causes that might not even seem rational to us.

Very interesting. Thanks for sharing.

Nor is there any reason to believe it could possibly deliver on #11.  War (Or preparedness for it) and entrepreneurial impulses have been the clear spurs to the lion's share of technological progress from the Renaissance until now, not central planning with resource allocations for technology R&D being weighed against the effect of possibly diminishing the level of popular benefits for the masses.  I daresay the clearly-foreseeable result of the proposed system would be to induce a technological hiatus that would make the current state of Islamic scientific endeavor (Frozen for some 600 years now) or 19th-Century Imperial China's (Essentially unchanged for well over a millennium before its slumber was disturbed by the Europeans) look astoundingly-advanced by comparison.