librechik
He's got nothing but a broad pallette of tested and successful Keynesian strategies which he can't use because about 20 Republicans would faint dead away at the smell of socialism.
Stinky The Clown
Ah yes. "Fear of Repubicans"
Its what's fer breakfast.
What we need is a tough leader.
Close, but no cookie.
Listen up, primitives, I'm going to explain something to you.
The problem with Keynesian economics is that it hasn't been successful nor does it have a track record of having done so. As a result, I don't personally believe in it, nor do I trust an economy that will lean on it, so I choose to not participate in the manner in which I have typically done in the past. I'm just one person doing that, but there are many, many millions of fellow citizens who are acting in the same manner as am I. Of those who are doing the same as me, what matters is who we are. If we were millions of people with barely two nickels to rub together, it would be of no effect. But that's not who we are. We're the middle, upper middle, lower wealthy, and wealthy, and so our non-partcipation causes ripples throughout the economy. Suddenly, corps find they can't chance investing capital to hire and produce because the very one's they need to buy aren't playing along. That's just one tiny example.
A tough leader wouldn't matter. Whoever is in office must be able to convince the people that what they're doing will work. Dear Leader never will. As long as we have him in office, you might as well get used to what you're seeing now. Clinton figured out in 1994 that he better get with the program, and he had some minor success, although the primary driver of the economy was the widespread use of the PC. Dear Leader does what the R's in the House tell him to do, it'll relieve some pressure, but this Obamacare law has pretty much buried any hope that he can be trusted to make prudent decisions.
.