RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Jun-06-11 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. As I pointed out elsewhere -
This in no way refutes Breitbart or his minions hacking the account.
Weiner only denied sending that first pic to that particular woman, which she also denied. The way he denied it left it wide open as to if that picture was sent to somebody else, or that that there might be other pictures. He did NOT deny that the first picture was sent to somebody else. He did NOT deny that there were other pictures.
If Brietbart et al hacked his account and took the pic from one post, the woman's name from another, and blended them (as posited those who proved it could be done) he could have been maneuvering for a categorical denial "did you send this picture to this woman" and Weiner says truthfully "No" - then they pounce with the real pics and the real recipients that they hacked.
Evidence? He only denied the first one; when confronted by the others, the genuine ones, he did not deny them.
And the question remains - how did Breitbart get the posts?
And they wonder why they look like idiots.
He admitted that he sent the picture. Nothing was hacked, no crime was committed in obtaining the picture.
The fact is that HE LIED about the whole deal and you IDIOTS fell for it.
What we need is to Jason Leopold on the story and then maybe you IDIOTS will believe it.
