Im not pulling the race card Im just pointing out the logical fallacies in his argument.
Once upoun a time there was a little thing called slavery which involved bringing lots of non-US citizens in to our country. Now all of their descendents are US citizens thanks to the 14th amendment. Do you now see why my argument is relative?
The emancipated were granted citizenship but like naturalized citizens it was not the same as natural born citizenship.
However, any of their descendents would be natural born citizens.
natural born citizen = 2 citizen parents
A pair of foreign tourists cannot come here, have a child and that child grow-up to be president merely because it plopped-out on to US soil. However, that child could marry a US citizen and their child(ren) would be considered natural born.