Author Topic: "Patriot" Act for Whom?  (Read 445 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CG6468

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11493
  • Reputation: +540/-210
"Patriot" Act for Whom?
« on: May 26, 2011, 02:07:06 PM »
Quote
There’s a Secret Patriot Act, Senator Says

    By Spencer Ackerman Email Author
    May 25, 2011  |
    4:56 pm  |
    
You may think you understand how the Patriot Act allows the government to spy on its citizens. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) says it’s worse than you’ve heard.

Congress is set to reauthorize three controversial provisions of the surveillance law as early as Thursday. But Wyden says that what Congress will renew is a mere fig leaf for a far broader legal interpretation of the Patriot Act that the government keeps to itself — entirely in secret. Worse, there are hints that the government uses this secret interpretation to gather what one Patriot-watcher calls a “dragnet” for massive amounts of information on private citizens; the government portrays its data-collection efforts much differently.

“We’re getting to a gap between what the public thinks the law says and what the American government secretly thinks the law says,” Wyden tells Danger Room in an interview in his Senate office. “When you’ve got that kind of a gap, you’re going to have a problem on your hands.”

What exactly does Wyden mean by that? As a member of the intelligence committee, he laments that he can’t precisely explain without disclosing classified information. But one component of the Patriot Act in particular gives him immense pause: the so-called “business-records provision,” which empowers the FBI to get businesses, medical offices, banks and other organizations to turn over any “tangible things” it deems relevant to a security investigation.

LINK: How Much More Of the Invasion of Our Lives Can We Tolerate
Illinois, south of the gun controllers in Chi town

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2222/-127
Re: "Patriot" Act for Whom?
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2011, 03:42:41 PM »
I didn't see  anything in that article pertaining to the Bush administration, it all seems to be things done under the Obama Regime.  Change we can believe in.