DUmmy no_hypocrisy just got busted for DUI, and decided to run to the DUmp for legal advice. There's some logic in that, since a high percentage of DUmpmonkeys have experience with the legal system as it pertains to alcohol consumption. But DUmmy no_hyprocrisy decides to pose as an attorney:
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 02:52 PM
Original message
You're driving sober with empty bottles of alcohol on the back seat that you're going to recycle.
You didn't drink any of the contents in the motor vehicle. The alcohol was consumed at your home.
You get a ticket for open container of alcohol in a motor vehicle.
Should you be convicted? Should the standard be simple: either the bottle was unsealed or it was sealed? Or should it matter you were hauling garbage?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x9684416warrior1 (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Open container of alcohol vs empty containers?
that's your question?
No, they won't give you a ticket. That would be ridiculous.
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. All empty. But obviously "open" in order to be empty.
Yeah, dickhead cop gave my client a ticket.
Thought I'd run my defense by you.
"Dickhead cop" is a lawyering term that avoids using those dickhead Latin words we all hate.
blueamy66 (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. If the containers are empty, there is no alcohol in them...
therefore, no open container of alcohol.
Only a dickhead cop would cite someone for that.
Have you ever noticed? That's the only type of cop a DUmp democrat ever runs into.
Chan790 (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. jurisdiction?
It might be ridiculous but here in MD, empties are open containers. You've got to put them in the trunk. VA is better though, you can have open containers in the passenger compartment as long as (open containers=total occupants-1 and the driver passes a sobriety test.) That is, everybody can have an open container (and be drinking) except the driver, though empties still count as open.
Whenever a DUmbass is arrested, there's always a political connection:
taterguy (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sounds like the client did something else that was legal but annoying
Are there bumper-stickers involved? Maybe it's a First Amendment issue that you can appeal all the way to the Supreme Court.
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Here's the thing. The cop wanted to get him on ANYTHING.
Made him take a Breath-A-Lyzer. He was a 0.2 and illegal level is 0.8. So couldn't get him on DUI and decided to search (with consent) my client's car.
Well, DUmmy, at 0.2 you are intoxicated. At 0.8 you are dead. Don't know your blood alcohol level, but you are brain dead. Maybe you're a dickhead attorney.
Hassin Bin Sober (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Are you an attorney?
Or are you a DUmmy fresh out of the drunk tank?
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. yes
Right. Call DUI-DUmmy. Many attorneys consult with the lunatics and addicts of the DUmp when faced with a difficult case.
Larry L. Burks has been the salvation of many an innocent man.
taterguy (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Sounds like the client answered "No" when asked if he had been drinking
Cop didn't believe him and gave him a Breathalyzer.
Results showed a slight amount of alcohol but cop might be pissed because client denied drinking.
Moral of story: Do not lie to cops if it's something they can easily verify.
Cops almost always have discretion about whether or not to write a citation. Never give them a reason to write you one.
DUmmy taterguy obviously spends a lot of time practicing touching his nose with his index finger while walking toe-to-heel.
Some DUmbass actually looked up a statute.
rug (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. N.J.S.A. 39:4-51a. Consumption By Operator Or Passenger.
a. A person shall not consume an alcoholic beverage while operating a motor vehicle. A passenger in a motor vehicle shall not consume an alcoholic beverage while the motor vehicle is being operated. This subsection shall not apply to a passenger of a charter or special bus operated as defined under R.S.48:4-1 or a limousine service.
Yet another DUmmy looks up a statute. They really believe the drunken OP is an attorney.
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. 51b says:
"the contents of the alcoholic beverage have been partially consumed and the physical appearance or conduct of the operator of the motor vehicle or a passenger may be associated with the consumption of an alcoholic beverage"
pitohui (1000+ posts) Sun May-08-11 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. did this happen in texas? i was warned not to do that there
i was told that even if you have a SEALED bottle, put it in the truck
That does no good when you keep your weed in the car.
dembotoz (1000+ posts) Mon May-09-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. fulls or empties always in the trunk--i have no luck -ever
hatchback--guess you are screwed.
in wisconsin one of the senators being recalled is calling for greater and greater dui punishements
perhaps when we recall walker they will push for crucifiction
DUmmy dembotoz spends a lot of time as a guest of the county.