Why would 25% of the population flee if it is such an awesome city?
What amazes me is that 75 percent have stayed since 2000. Actually, even that much isn't true. If you take normal population growth in the US over the past 10 years (9.7 percent increase) Detroit should, if it were growing at the same rate as the rest of the United States, a population of about 1.05 million. Meaning, dear reader, that the population of Detroit has decreased in real terms more on the order of 30 percent.
And it gets still worse. In 1950, the population of Detroit was 1.85 million, and of the United States, 151 million. So if we were to extrapolate what Detroit's population SHOULD be had it kept pace with the rest of the nation, we should see Detroit at a population approaching 3.7 million, not 750K.
Meaning, if you crunch the numbers, that Detroit city has effectively lost 80 percent of its population since 1950. Detroit metro population in 1960 was just over 4 million. It has increased less than 7 percent in 50 years. It SHOULD be closer to 6-6.5 million had the area kept up with the rest of the United States in population growth.
IOW, Ms. Watson--it is YOU who should be held to account for your lack of production. YOU should be flogged and flayed alive for what you have done to a once-great city. Nobody should bail you out. Ride it down, Ms. Watson. You created it, you should live with what you and your fellow corrupt bureaucrats have done.
From the Wiki:
According to a study released by the Bay Area Center for Voting Research, Detroit is the most liberal large city in America, measuring only the percentage of city residents who voted for the Democratic Party.