I watched this thing nearly twice. The guy says a lot of insane things but I do thing right at the beginning, he has a point in that the shift from a print media to a more highly manipulative highly visual media does leave people with this sense that they know more than they know. Which is pretty much liberalism in a nutshell.
He also talks about a neo-feudalism except it ascribes it to something other than the end result of Marxism (in whatever from) but he says so much silly stuff it kind of numbs the mind and I think it contributes to his first point on visual media.
He also talks about liberal values but never says what they are. And he talks about liberal churches and bashes the "religious right" but I am still unclear on what a "liberal church" is.
Then he talks about how the "religious right" isn't in touch with reality. Again he inverts reality (perhaps, I am no expert on the so-called "religious right") in that it is liberalism that is never in touch with reality, as we saw in a DUmmie post today defending the welfare state by basically saying its inherent insustainability is "bullshit" without ever amplifying on that brilliant piece or rhetoric.
