Author Topic: Never Waste a Good Crisis  (Read 1250 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Peter_Suciu

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 35
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Never Waste a Good Crisis
« on: March 29, 2011, 04:24:21 PM »
From FirearmsTruth (http://www.firearmstruth.com/2011/never-waste-a-good-crisis)

Never Waste a Good Crisis

The title of this article was spoken by the Obama administration’s former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. Is this the philosophy the President is using to keep the scandalous operations Project Gunrunner and Fast and Furious out of the mainstream media headlines?

The ATF’s sting operation has come back to plant apitoxin in the long arm of the law. As regular readers of FirearmsTruth know, Project Gunrunner allowed straw buyers to illegally buy and export guns to Mexican drug cartels. Over 1,700 firearms were involved and some have been used to murder U.S. agents and Mexican citizens.

A few major news outlets, including CBS and FOX News, have run stories on the scandal over the last few weeks. But the coverage has been back-page news compared to the war in Libya, the nuclear disaster in Japan and the latest antics of Charlie Sheen. There has been little editorial discussion about the subject on talk shows like Meet The Press and the late night comedians haven’t satirized the ATF.

If the public is to be informed, the press has to report on stories, even if they don’t fit their political view. Before Project Gunrunner and Fast and Furious broke, most of the media repeated the falsity that 90% of the guns seized from the Mexican drug gangs came from the United States. Stories attacking guns shows and gun stores near the U.S. Mexican border peppered the reading and viewing public. Now that we know our own government perpetrated these sales, news stories citing the 90% fallacy have disappeared. The question arises: If we are engaged in a war on drugs, why is the government selling weapons to the enemy?

President Obama has called the ATF’s actions “a serious mistake” but isn’t willing to take responsibility for the apitoxic sting. “I did not authorize it; Eric Holder, the attorney general, did not authorize it. He’s been very clear that our policy is to catch gunrunners and put them into jail.”

So who is in charge? The ATF operates under the Justice Department, which is headed by Eric Holder. Two of  Holder’s assistant U.S. attorneys administered Operation Fast and Furious. It seems unlikely that such an operation could be undertaken without Holder’s knowledge. This isn’t a simple law enforcement matter. There are international implications attached to Fast and Furious and U.S./Mexican relations have been strained because of the ATF’s actions.

It doesn’t seem likely that a domestic law enforcement agency could be co-opted by mid-level officials to interfere with international relationships. At the very least, the State Department should have been consulted. But if the President is to be believed, no higher-ups knew anything. That means we have an administration that isn’t in control of its own levers of power.

Yesterday FirearmsTruth asked the question “Is the U.S. Bombing Libya to Deflect Attention From Fast and Furious?” We put our foot in the conspiratorial pool to test the temperature of the water. The problem with most conspiracy theories is that they rely on half-truths, circumstantial evidence and made-up facts. The simplest explanation is usually correct. As the 2012 election starts to heat up, it is clear the administration doesn’t need a well-known scandal to pierce the public’s conscience. The crisis in Libya and other parts of the world weren’t perpetrated by President Obama, but they have been exploited by those in the press who subvert news coverage so as to lend support to the President’s reelection.
Author of America's Road to Fascism: From the Progressives to the Era of Hope and Change
FirearmsTruth - Exposing the bias against the Second Amendment

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1998/-134
Re: Never Waste a Good Crisis
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2011, 04:34:21 PM »
It's liberals trying to get stronger gun control laws.

If you don't have enough law breakers...make a few.
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline RealConservativePatriot

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 79
  • Reputation: +4/-17
Re: Never Waste a Good Crisis
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2011, 09:55:46 PM »
We have gun laws in this country that I believe are reasonable. We need background checks to make sure mental cases and criminals don't get guns, but everyone else has a right to own a gun for hunting or target practice. I fear both sides are not making a good case; one side wants to allow everyone to own a gun, the other wants even law-abiding citizens to not be able to own guns. I believe that our current gun laws are reasonable and should be upheld. It is the balance between public safety and constitutional rights.

Offline FreeBorn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2779
  • Reputation: +257/-45
  • Semper Fidelis
Re: Never Waste a Good Crisis
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2011, 11:57:37 PM »
We have gun laws in this country that I believe are reasonable. We need background checks to make sure mental cases and criminals don't get guns, but everyone else has a right to own a gun for hunting or target practice. I fear both sides are not making a good case; one side wants to allow everyone to own a gun, the other wants even law-abiding citizens to not be able to own guns. I believe that our current gun laws are reasonable and should be upheld. It is the balance between public safety and constitutional rights.
"Hunting and target practice" are not the reasons we have the Second Amendment.
The woman in this video witnessed her parents murdered, along with several other innocent folks. Her name is Suzanna Gratia Hupp. She tells it like it is to these gun grabbing politicians, most notably among them is Chuck Schumer. (Notice Schumer's posture, this man is a Senator of the United States. If I had behaved like that in church growing up, my face in my hand, slouching on my elbow my father would have slapped me out of the pew.)

The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting or target shooting.


[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1u0Byq5Qis[/youtube]


"How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin; And how do you tell an anti-communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." ~Ronald Reagan